These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29378995)

  • 1. Evaluation of vertical marginal adaptation of provisional crowns by digital microscope.
    Al Rifaiy MQ
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2017 Dec; 20(12):1610-1617. PubMed ID: 29378995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. 3D and 2D marginal fit of pressed and CAD/CAM lithium disilicate crowns made from digital and conventional impressions.
    Anadioti E; Aquilino SA; Gratton DG; Holloway JA; Denry I; Thomas GW; Qian F
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Dec; 23(8):610-7. PubMed ID: 24995593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Marginal adaptation and color stability of four provisional materials.
    Givens EJ; Neiva G; Yaman P; Dennison JB
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Feb; 17(2):97-101. PubMed ID: 17971123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of the crown preparation margin and die type on the marginal accuracy of fiber-reinforced composite crowns.
    Ayad MF
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Feb; 9(2):9-16. PubMed ID: 18264520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Marginal fidelity of crowns fabricated from six proprietary provisional materials.
    Tjan AH; Castelnuovo J; Shiotsu G
    J Prosthet Dent; 1997 May; 77(5):482-5. PubMed ID: 9151267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the marginal fit of three margin designs of resin composite crowns using CAD/CAM.
    Tsitrou EA; Northeast SE; van Noort R
    J Dent; 2007 Jan; 35(1):68-73. PubMed ID: 16781043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Marginal and internal fit of CAD-CAM-fabricated composite resin and ceramic crowns scanned by 2 intraoral cameras.
    de Paula Silveira AC; Chaves SB; Hilgert LA; Ribeiro AP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):386-392. PubMed ID: 27677214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Marginal and internal discrepancies related to margin design of ceramic crowns fabricated by a CAD/CAM system.
    Souza RO; Özcan M; Pavanelli CA; Buso L; Lombardo GH; Michida SM; Mesquita AM; Bottino MA
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Feb; 21(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 22050205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Long-term effects of storage and thermal cycling on the marginal adaptation of provisional resin crowns: a pilot study.
    Ehrenberg D; Weiner GI; Weiner S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Mar; 95(3):230-6. PubMed ID: 16543021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of different fabrication steps on the marginal adaptation of two types of glass-infiltrated ceramic crown copings fabricated by CAD/CAM technology.
    Alghazzawi TF; Liu PR; Essig ME
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Apr; 21(3):167-72. PubMed ID: 22372838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluating the marginal fit of zirconia copings with digital impressions with an intraoral digital scanner.
    An S; Kim S; Choi H; Lee JH; Moon HS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1171-5. PubMed ID: 24951386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Marginal adaptation of Cerec 3 CAD/CAM composite crowns using two different finish line preparation designs.
    Akbar JH; Petrie CS; Walker MP; Williams K; Eick JD
    J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(3):155-63. PubMed ID: 16681497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Digital microscopic evaluation of vertical marginal discrepancies of CAD/CAM fabricated zirconia cores.
    Habib SR
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2019 Apr; 64(2):207-214. PubMed ID: 29775437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of the marginal fit of crowns fabricated with digital and conventional methods.
    Ng J; Ruse D; Wyatt C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):555-60. PubMed ID: 24630399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative in vitro evaluation of CAD/CAM vs conventional provisional crowns.
    Abdullah AO; Tsitrou EA; Pollington S
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2016; 24(3):258-63. PubMed ID: 27383707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated with CAD/CAM technology by using conventional impressions and two intraoral digital scanners.
    Abdel-Azim T; Rogers K; Elathamna E; Zandinejad A; Metz M; Morton D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Oct; 114(4):554-9. PubMed ID: 26100929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of fit and efficiency of CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic restorations based on direct and indirect digitalization: a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial.
    Ahrberg D; Lauer HC; Ahrberg M; Weigl P
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Mar; 20(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 26070435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Marginal and internal adaptation of ceramic crown restorations fabricated with CAD/CAM technology and the heat-press technique.
    Mously HA; Finkelman M; Zandparsa R; Hirayama H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):249-56. PubMed ID: 24795263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Marginal accuracy and fracture strength of ceromer/fiber-reinforced composite crowns: effect of variations in preparation design.
    Cho L; Song H; Koak J; Heo S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Oct; 88(4):388-95. PubMed ID: 12447215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vitro evaluation of the marginal integrity of CAD/CAM interim crowns.
    Kelvin Khng KY; Ettinger RL; Armstrong SR; Lindquist T; Gratton DG; Qian F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 May; 115(5):617-23. PubMed ID: 26774313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.