These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

418 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29380189)

  • 1. Respiratory changes in subclavian vein diameters predicts fluid responsiveness in intensive care patients: a pilot study.
    Giraud R; Abraham PS; Brindel P; Siegenthaler N; Bendjelid K
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2018 Dec; 32(6):1049-1055. PubMed ID: 29380189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Decrease in pulse pressure and stroke volume variations after mini-fluid challenge accurately predicts fluid responsiveness†.
    Mallat J; Meddour M; Durville E; Lemyze M; Pepy F; Temime J; Vangrunderbeeck N; Tronchon L; Thevenin D; Tavernier B
    Br J Anaesth; 2015 Sep; 115(3):449-56. PubMed ID: 26152341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Stroke volume and pulse pressure variation are good predictors of fluid responsiveness in sepsis patients].
    Drvar Z; Pavlek M; Drvar V; Tomasević B; Baronica R; Perić M
    Acta Med Croatica; 2013 Dec; 67(5):407-14. PubMed ID: 24979881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [A prospective clinical study of pleth variability index in prediction of volume responsiveness in patients with septic shock].
    Lu N; Zheng R; Lin H; Yu J; Shao J; Wu X; Wang H
    Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2015 Jan; 27(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 25591431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predictive values of pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation for fluid responsiveness in patients with pneumoperitoneum.
    Zlicar M; Novak-Jankovic V; Blagus R; Cecconi M
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2018 Oct; 32(5):825-832. PubMed ID: 29149433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients ventilated with low tidal volume and high positive end-expiratory pressure.
    Huang CC; Fu JY; Hu HC; Kao KC; Chen NH; Hsieh MJ; Tsai YH
    Crit Care Med; 2008 Oct; 36(10):2810-6. PubMed ID: 18766099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Change in cardiac output during Trendelenburg maneuver is a reliable predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome in the prone position under protective ventilation.
    Yonis H; Bitker L; Aublanc M; Perinel Ragey S; Riad Z; Lissonde F; Louf-Durier A; Debord S; Gobert F; Tapponnier R; Guérin C; Richard JC
    Crit Care; 2017 Dec; 21(1):295. PubMed ID: 29208025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Non-invasive measurements of pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation in anesthetized patients using the Nexfin blood pressure monitor.
    Stens J; Oeben J; Van Dusseldorp AA; Boer C
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2016 Oct; 30(5):587-94. PubMed ID: 26318314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predicting Fluid Responsiveness in Acute Liver Failure: A Prospective Study.
    Audimoolam VK; McPhail MJ; Willars C; Bernal W; Wendon JA; Cecconi M; Auzinger G
    Anesth Analg; 2017 Feb; 124(2):480-486. PubMed ID: 27984249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Efficacy of functional hemodynamic parameters in predicting fluid responsiveness with pulse power analysis in surgical patients.
    Cecconi M; Monti G; Hamilton MA; Puntis M; Dawson D; Tuccillo ML; Della Rocca G; Grounds RM; Rhodes A
    Minerva Anestesiol; 2012 May; 78(5):527-33. PubMed ID: 22534733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of VTILVOT variation rate on the assessment of fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients.
    Wang J; Zhou D; Gao Y; Wu Z; Wang X; Lv C
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Nov; 99(47):e22702. PubMed ID: 33217793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ability of a New Smartphone Pulse Pressure Variation and Cardiac Output Application to Predict Fluid Responsiveness in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery.
    Joosten A; Boudart C; Vincent JL; Vanden Eynden F; Barvais L; Van Obbergh L; Rinehart J; Desebbe O
    Anesth Analg; 2019 Jun; 128(6):1145-1151. PubMed ID: 31094781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Uncalibrated pulse contour-derived stroke volume variation predicts fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients undergoing liver transplantation.
    Biais M; Nouette-Gaulain K; Cottenceau V; Revel P; Sztark F
    Br J Anaesth; 2008 Dec; 101(6):761-8. PubMed ID: 18852114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Respiratory variation in the internal jugular vein does not predict fluid responsiveness in the prone position during adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery: a prospective cohort study.
    Wu M; Dai Z; Liang Y; Liu X; Zheng X; Zhang W; Bo J
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2023 Nov; 23(1):360. PubMed ID: 37932674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated cardiac surgical patients: the performance of seven different functional hemodynamic parameters.
    Ganter MT; Geisen M; Hartnack S; Dzemali O; Hofer CK
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2018 May; 18(1):55. PubMed ID: 29788919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of an automated respiratory systolic variation test with dynamic preload indicators to predict fluid responsiveness after major surgery.
    Trepte CJ; Eichhorn V; Haas SA; Stahl K; Schmid F; Nitzschke R; Goetz AE; Reuter DA
    Br J Anaesth; 2013 Nov; 111(5):736-42. PubMed ID: 23811425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Plethysmography variability index for prediction of fluid responsiveness during graded haemorrhage and transfusion in sevoflurane-anaesthetized mechanically ventilated dogs.
    Endo Y; Kawase K; Miyasho T; Sano T; Yamashita K; Muir WW
    Vet Anaesth Analg; 2017 Nov; 44(6):1303-1312. PubMed ID: 29113716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dynamic preload indicators fail to predict fluid responsiveness in open-chest conditions.
    de Waal EE; Rex S; Kruitwagen CL; Kalkman CJ; Buhre WF
    Crit Care Med; 2009 Feb; 37(2):510-5. PubMed ID: 19114886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients: comparing stroke volume variation by FloTrac/Vigileo and automated pulse pressure variation.
    Khwannimit B; Bhurayanontachai R
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2012 Feb; 29(2):64-9. PubMed ID: 21946822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inferior vena cava diameter variation compared with pulse pressure variation as predictors of fluid responsiveness in patients with sepsis.
    Theerawit P; Morasert T; Sutherasan Y
    J Crit Care; 2016 Dec; 36():246-251. PubMed ID: 27591389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.