231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29381097)
1. The relationship between speech recognition, behavioural listening effort, and subjective ratings.
Picou EM; Ricketts TA
Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(6):457-467. PubMed ID: 29381097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An Evaluation of Hearing Aid Beamforming Microphone Arrays in a Noisy Laboratory Setting.
Picou EM; Ricketts TA
J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Feb; 30(2):131-144. PubMed ID: 30461406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effects of hearing aid use on listening effort and mental fatigue associated with sustained speech processing demands.
Hornsby BW
Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):523-34. PubMed ID: 23426091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Effects of Directional Processing on Objective and Subjective Listening Effort.
Picou EM; Moore TM; Ricketts TA
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Jan; 60(1):199-211. PubMed ID: 28114609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. How directional microphones affect speech recognition, listening effort and localisation for listeners with moderate-to-severe hearing loss.
Picou EM; Ricketts TA
Int J Audiol; 2017 Dec; 56(12):909-918. PubMed ID: 28738747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Speech Perception in Noise and Listening Effort of Older Adults With Nonlinear Frequency Compression Hearing Aids.
Shehorn J; Marrone N; Muller T
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):215-225. PubMed ID: 28806193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Measuring listening effort: driving simulator versus simple dual-task paradigm.
Wu YH; Aksan N; Rizzo M; Stangl E; Zhang X; Bentler R
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):623-32. PubMed ID: 25083599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Investigating Speech Recognition and listening effort with different device configurations in adult cochlear implant users.
Sladen DP; Nie Y; Berg K
Cochlear Implants Int; 2018 May; 19(3):119-130. PubMed ID: 29457564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Effects of Hearing Aid Directional Microphone and Noise Reduction Processing on Listening Effort in Older Adults with Hearing Loss.
Desjardins JL
J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Jan; 27(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 26809324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Potential benefits and limitations of three types of directional processing in hearing aids.
Picou EM; Aspell E; Ricketts TA
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):339-52. PubMed ID: 24518429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of changing the secondary task in dual-task paradigms for measuring listening effort.
Picou EM; Ricketts TA
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):611-22. PubMed ID: 24992491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Do hearing loss and cognitive function modulate benefit from different binaural noise-reduction settings?
Neher T; Grimm G; Hohmann V; Kollmeier B
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):e52-62. PubMed ID: 24351610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of Adaptive Noise Management Technologies for School-Age Children with Hearing Loss.
Wolfe J; Duke M; Schafer E; Jones C; Rakita L
J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 May; 28(5):415-435. PubMed ID: 28534732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. How hearing aids, background noise, and visual cues influence objective listening effort.
Picou EM; Ricketts TA; Hornsby BW
Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):e52-64. PubMed ID: 23416751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of hearing aid noise reduction on listening effort in hearing-impaired adults.
Desjardins JL; Doherty KA
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):600-10. PubMed ID: 24622352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Effect of a High Upper Input Limiting Level on Word Recognition in Noise, Sound Quality Preferences, and Subjective Ratings of Real-World Performance.
Oeding K; Valente M
J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Jun; 26(6):547-62. PubMed ID: 26134722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Semantic context improves speech intelligibility and reduces listening effort for listeners with hearing impairment.
Holmes E; Folkeard P; Johnsrude IS; Scollie S
Int J Audiol; 2018 Jul; 57(7):483-492. PubMed ID: 29415585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Perceived listening effort and speech intelligibility in reverberation and noise for hearing-impaired listeners.
Schepker H; Haeder K; Rennies J; Holube I
Int J Audiol; 2016 Dec; 55(12):738-747. PubMed ID: 27627181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Efficacy of hearing-aid based telephone strategies for listeners with moderate-to-severe hearing loss.
Picou EM; Ricketts TA
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jan; 24(1):59-70. PubMed ID: 23231817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Speech recognition for bilaterally asymmetric and symmetric hearing aid microphone modes in simulated classroom environments.
Ricketts TA; Picou EM
Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):601-9. PubMed ID: 23524508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
