These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29381589)

  • 21. Examining gender bias in the feedback shared with family medicine residents.
    Loeppky C; Babenko O; Ross S
    Educ Prim Care; 2017 Nov; 28(6):319-324. PubMed ID: 28812957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Faculty staff perceptions of feedback to residents after direct observation of clinical skills.
    Kogan JR; Conforti LN; Bernabeo EC; Durning SJ; Hauer KE; Holmboe ES
    Med Educ; 2012 Feb; 46(2):201-15. PubMed ID: 22239334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Faculty feedback versus residents' self-assessment of operative performance: Different but complementary.
    Tanoue N; Korovin LN; Carton M; Galvani CA; Ghaderi I
    Am J Surg; 2018 Feb; 215(2):288-292. PubMed ID: 29169822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Involving ophthalmology departmental stakeholders in developing workplace-based assessment tools.
    Braund H; Dalgarno N; McEwen L; Egan R; Reid MA; Baxter S
    Can J Ophthalmol; 2019 Oct; 54(5):590-600. PubMed ID: 31564350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Two-Year Experience Implementing a Curriculum to Improve Residents' Patient-Centered Communication Skills.
    Trickey AW; Newcomb AB; Porrey M; Piscitani F; Wright J; Graling P; Dort J
    J Surg Educ; 2017; 74(6):e124-e132. PubMed ID: 28756146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Assessment of Surgery Residents' Interpersonal Communication Skills: Validation Evidence for the Communication Assessment Tool in a Simulation Environment.
    Trickey AW; Newcomb AB; Porrey M; Wright J; Bayless J; Piscitani F; Graling P; Dort J
    J Surg Educ; 2016; 73(6):e19-e27. PubMed ID: 27216300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluating Surgical Residents Quickly and Easily Against the Milestones Using Electronic Formative Feedback.
    Hartranft TH; Yandle K; Graham T; Holden C; Chambers LW
    J Surg Educ; 2017; 74(2):237-242. PubMed ID: 27746056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The effects of self-assessment and supervisor feedback on residents' patient-education competency using videoed outpatient consultations.
    Wouda JC; van de Wiel HB
    Patient Educ Couns; 2014 Oct; 97(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 24993839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Challenges of interprofessional team training: a qualitative analysis of residents' perceptions.
    van Schaik S; Plant J; O'Brien B
    Educ Health (Abingdon); 2015; 28(1):52-7. PubMed ID: 26261115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Feedback in formative OSCEs: comparison between direct observation and video-based formats.
    Junod Perron N; Louis-Simonet M; Cerutti B; Pfarrwaller E; Sommer J; Nendaz M
    Med Educ Online; 2016; 21():32160. PubMed ID: 27834170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Necessary but not sufficient: identifying conditions for effective feedback during internal medicine residents' clinical education.
    MacNeil K; Cuncic C; Voyer S; Butler D; Hatala R
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2020 Aug; 25(3):641-654. PubMed ID: 31872326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Co-debriefing for simulation-based education: a primer for facilitators.
    Cheng A; Palaganas J; Eppich W; Rudolph J; Robinson T; Grant V
    Simul Healthc; 2015 Apr; 10(2):69-75. PubMed ID: 25710318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Faculty feedback that begins with resident self-assessment: motivation is the key to success.
    Moroz A; Horlick M; Mandalaywala N; Stern DT
    Med Educ; 2018 Mar; 52(3):314-323. PubMed ID: 29205433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comprehensive educational performance improvement (CEPI): an innovative competency-based assessment tool.
    Reich LM; David RA
    Mt Sinai J Med; 2005 Sep; 72(5):300-6. PubMed ID: 16184292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Do Faculty Benefit From Participating in a Standardized Patient Assessment as Part of Rater Training? A Qualitative Study.
    Conforti LN; Ross KM; Holmboe ES; Kogan JR
    Acad Med; 2016 Feb; 91(2):262-71. PubMed ID: 26222323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Utility of factor analysis in optimization of resident assessment and faculty evaluation.
    Teman NR; Minter RM; Kasten SJ
    Am J Surg; 2016 Jun; 211(6):1158-63. PubMed ID: 26975661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Helping without harming: the instructor's feedback dilemma in debriefing--a case study.
    Rudolph JW; Foldy EG; Robinson T; Kendall S; Taylor SS; Simon R
    Simul Healthc; 2013 Oct; 8(5):304-16. PubMed ID: 24084647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Intraoperative Feedback: A Video-BasedAnalysis of Faculty and Resident Perceptions.
    Dedhia PH; Barrett M; Ives G; Magas CP; Varban OA; Wong SL; Sandhu G
    J Surg Educ; 2019; 76(4):906-915. PubMed ID: 30826263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Interdisciplinary direct observation: impact on precepting, residents, and faculty.
    Ross V; Mauksch L; Huntington J; Beard JM
    Fam Med; 2012 May; 44(5):318-24. PubMed ID: 23027113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Resident versus faculty member simulation debriefing.
    Adams T; Newton C; Patel H; Sulistio M; Tomlinson A; Lee W
    Clin Teach; 2018 Dec; 15(6):462-466. PubMed ID: 29144023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.