467 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29381789)
1. Comparison of self-reported dietary intakes from the Automated Self-Administered 24-h recall, 4-d food records, and food-frequency questionnaires against recovery biomarkers.
Park Y; Dodd KW; Kipnis V; Thompson FE; Potischman N; Schoeller DA; Baer DJ; Midthune D; Troiano RP; Bowles H; Subar AF
Am J Clin Nutr; 2018 Jan; 107(1):80-93. PubMed ID: 29381789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Performance and Feasibility of Recalls Completed Using the Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour Dietary Assessment Tool in Relation to Other Self-Report Tools and Biomarkers in the Interactive Diet and Activity Tracking in AARP (IDATA) Study.
Subar AF; Potischman N; Dodd KW; Thompson FE; Baer DJ; Schoeller DA; Midthune D; Kipnis V; Kirkpatrick SI; Mittl B; Zimmerman TP; Douglass D; Bowles HR; Park Y
J Acad Nutr Diet; 2020 Nov; 120(11):1805-1820. PubMed ID: 32819883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validation of Total Water Intake from the Automated Self-Administered 24-h Recall, 4-d Food Records, and a Food Frequency Questionnaire Using Doubly Labeled Water.
Chang DC; Stinson EJ; Dodd KW; Bowles HR; Herrick KA; Schoeller DA; Barrett B; Votruba SB; Krakoff J; Kavouras SA
J Nutr; 2023 Oct; 153(10):3049-3057. PubMed ID: 37660952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Relative Validity of Nutrient Intakes Assessed by Questionnaire, 24-Hour Recalls, and Diet Records as Compared With Urinary Recovery and Plasma Concentration Biomarkers: Findings for Women.
Yuan C; Spiegelman D; Rimm EB; Rosner BA; Stampfer MJ; Barnett JB; Chavarro JE; Rood JC; Harnack LJ; Sampson LK; Willett WC
Am J Epidemiol; 2018 May; 187(5):1051-1063. PubMed ID: 29036411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Use of biological markers to validate self-reported dietary intake in a random sample of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer United Kingdom Norfolk cohort.
McKeown NM; Day NE; Welch AA; Runswick SA; Luben RN; Mulligan AA; McTaggart A; Bingham SA
Am J Clin Nutr; 2001 Aug; 74(2):188-96. PubMed ID: 11470719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pooled results from 5 validation studies of dietary self-report instruments using recovery biomarkers for energy and protein intake.
Freedman LS; Commins JM; Moler JE; Arab L; Baer DJ; Kipnis V; Midthune D; Moshfegh AJ; Neuhouser ML; Prentice RL; Schatzkin A; Spiegelman D; Subar AF; Tinker LF; Willett W
Am J Epidemiol; 2014 Jul; 180(2):172-88. PubMed ID: 24918187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparing Reported Dietary Supplement Intakes between Two 24-Hour Recall Methods: The Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour Dietary Assessment Tool and the Interview-Administered Automated Multiple Pass Method.
Pannucci TE; Thompson FE; Bailey RL; Dodd KW; Potischman N; Kirkpatrick SI; Alexander GL; Coleman LA; Kushi LH; Groesbeck M; Sundaram M; Clancy H; George SM; Kahle L; Subar AF
J Acad Nutr Diet; 2018 Jun; 118(6):1080-1086. PubMed ID: 29803270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reproducibility and Validity of a Semiquantitative Food Frequency Questionnaire in Men Assessed by Multiple Methods.
Al-Shaar L; Yuan C; Rosner B; Dean SB; Ivey KL; Clowry CM; Sampson LA; Barnett JB; Rood J; Harnack LJ; Block J; Manson JE; Stampfer MJ; Willett WC; Rimm EB
Am J Epidemiol; 2021 Jun; 190(6):1122-1132. PubMed ID: 33350436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pooled results from 5 validation studies of dietary self-report instruments using recovery biomarkers for potassium and sodium intake.
Freedman LS; Commins JM; Moler JE; Willett W; Tinker LF; Subar AF; Spiegelman D; Rhodes D; Potischman N; Neuhouser ML; Moshfegh AJ; Kipnis V; Arab L; Prentice RL
Am J Epidemiol; 2015 Apr; 181(7):473-87. PubMed ID: 25787264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Nutritional methods in the European Prospective Investigation of Cancer in Norfolk.
Bingham SA; Welch AA; McTaggart A; Mulligan AA; Runswick SA; Luben R; Oakes S; Khaw KT; Wareham N; Day NE
Public Health Nutr; 2001 Jun; 4(3):847-58. PubMed ID: 11415493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Using biochemical markers to assess the validity of prospective dietary assessment methods and the effect of energy adjustment.
Bingham SA; Day NE
Am J Clin Nutr; 1997 Apr; 65(4 Suppl):1130S-1137S. PubMed ID: 9094909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validity and reliability of an online self-report 24-h dietary recall method (Intake24): a doubly labelled water study and repeated-measures analysis.
Foster E; Lee C; Imamura F; Hollidge SE; Westgate KL; Venables MC; Poliakov I; Rowland MK; Osadchiy T; Bradley JC; Simpson EL; Adamson AJ; Olivier P; Wareham N; Forouhi NG; Brage S
J Nutr Sci; 2019; 8():e29. PubMed ID: 31501691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation of a self-administered food-frequency questionnaire administered in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) Study: comparison of energy, protein, and macronutrient intakes estimated with the doubly labeled water, urinary nitrogen, and repeated 24-h dietary recall methods.
Kroke A; Klipstein-Grobusch K; Voss S; Möseneder J; Thielecke F; Noack R; Boeing H
Am J Clin Nutr; 1999 Oct; 70(4):439-47. PubMed ID: 10500011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation of an automated self-administered 24-hour dietary recall web application against urinary recovery biomarkers in a sample of French-speaking adults of the province of Québec, Canada.
Paradis F; Lamarche B; Robitaille J; Couillard C; Lafrenière J; Tremblay AJ; Corneau L; Lemieux S
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab; 2022 Feb; 47(2):173-182. PubMed ID: 35057638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of women's diet assessed by FFQs and 24-hour recalls with and without underreporters: associations with biomarkers.
Olafsdottir AS; Thorsdottir I; Gunnarsdottir I; Thorgeirsdottir H; Steingrimsdottir L
Ann Nutr Metab; 2006; 50(5):450-60. PubMed ID: 16877864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validation of a food frequency questionnaire as a tool for assessing dietary intake in cardiovascular disease research and surveillance in Bangladesh.
Mumu SJ; Merom D; Ali L; Fahey PP; Hossain I; Rahman AKMF; Allman-Farinelli M
Nutr J; 2020 May; 19(1):42. PubMed ID: 32410632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validating polyphenol intake estimates from a food-frequency questionnaire by using repeated 24-h dietary recalls and a unique method-of-triads approach with 2 biomarkers.
Burkholder-Cooley NM; Rajaram SS; Haddad EH; Oda K; Fraser GE; Jaceldo-Siegl K
Am J Clin Nutr; 2017 Mar; 105(3):685-694. PubMed ID: 28122784
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Validity of a Dietary Questionnaire Assessed by Comparison With Multiple Weighed Dietary Records or 24-Hour Recalls.
Yuan C; Spiegelman D; Rimm EB; Rosner BA; Stampfer MJ; Barnett JB; Chavarro JE; Subar AF; Sampson LK; Willett WC
Am J Epidemiol; 2017 Apr; 185(7):570-584. PubMed ID: 28338828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validity of Absolute Intake and Nutrient Density of Protein, Potassium, and Sodium Assessed by Various Dietary Assessment Methods: An Exploratory Study.
Trijsburg L; Geelen A; Hulshof PJM; Van't Veer P; Boshuizen HC; Hollman PCH; van Dijk G; Feskens EJM; de Vries JHM
Nutrients; 2019 Dec; 12(1):. PubMed ID: 31906097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the 24-Hour Recall as a Reference Instrument for Calibrating Other Self-Report Instruments in Nutritional Cohort Studies: Evidence From the Validation Studies Pooling Project.
Freedman LS; Commins JM; Willett W; Tinker LF; Spiegelman D; Rhodes D; Potischman N; Neuhouser ML; Moshfegh AJ; Kipnis V; Baer DJ; Arab L; Prentice RL; Subar AF
Am J Epidemiol; 2017 Jul; 186(1):73-82. PubMed ID: 28402488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
