These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
490 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29381789)
1. Comparison of self-reported dietary intakes from the Automated Self-Administered 24-h recall, 4-d food records, and food-frequency questionnaires against recovery biomarkers. Park Y; Dodd KW; Kipnis V; Thompson FE; Potischman N; Schoeller DA; Baer DJ; Midthune D; Troiano RP; Bowles H; Subar AF Am J Clin Nutr; 2018 Jan; 107(1):80-93. PubMed ID: 29381789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Performance and Feasibility of Recalls Completed Using the Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour Dietary Assessment Tool in Relation to Other Self-Report Tools and Biomarkers in the Interactive Diet and Activity Tracking in AARP (IDATA) Study. Subar AF; Potischman N; Dodd KW; Thompson FE; Baer DJ; Schoeller DA; Midthune D; Kipnis V; Kirkpatrick SI; Mittl B; Zimmerman TP; Douglass D; Bowles HR; Park Y J Acad Nutr Diet; 2020 Nov; 120(11):1805-1820. PubMed ID: 32819883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validation of Total Water Intake from the Automated Self-Administered 24-h Recall, 4-d Food Records, and a Food Frequency Questionnaire Using Doubly Labeled Water. Chang DC; Stinson EJ; Dodd KW; Bowles HR; Herrick KA; Schoeller DA; Barrett B; Votruba SB; Krakoff J; Kavouras SA J Nutr; 2023 Oct; 153(10):3049-3057. PubMed ID: 37660952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Relative Validity of Nutrient Intakes Assessed by Questionnaire, 24-Hour Recalls, and Diet Records as Compared With Urinary Recovery and Plasma Concentration Biomarkers: Findings for Women. Yuan C; Spiegelman D; Rimm EB; Rosner BA; Stampfer MJ; Barnett JB; Chavarro JE; Rood JC; Harnack LJ; Sampson LK; Willett WC Am J Epidemiol; 2018 May; 187(5):1051-1063. PubMed ID: 29036411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Use of biological markers to validate self-reported dietary intake in a random sample of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer United Kingdom Norfolk cohort. McKeown NM; Day NE; Welch AA; Runswick SA; Luben RN; Mulligan AA; McTaggart A; Bingham SA Am J Clin Nutr; 2001 Aug; 74(2):188-96. PubMed ID: 11470719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pooled results from 5 validation studies of dietary self-report instruments using recovery biomarkers for energy and protein intake. Freedman LS; Commins JM; Moler JE; Arab L; Baer DJ; Kipnis V; Midthune D; Moshfegh AJ; Neuhouser ML; Prentice RL; Schatzkin A; Spiegelman D; Subar AF; Tinker LF; Willett W Am J Epidemiol; 2014 Jul; 180(2):172-88. PubMed ID: 24918187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparing Reported Dietary Supplement Intakes between Two 24-Hour Recall Methods: The Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour Dietary Assessment Tool and the Interview-Administered Automated Multiple Pass Method. Pannucci TE; Thompson FE; Bailey RL; Dodd KW; Potischman N; Kirkpatrick SI; Alexander GL; Coleman LA; Kushi LH; Groesbeck M; Sundaram M; Clancy H; George SM; Kahle L; Subar AF J Acad Nutr Diet; 2018 Jun; 118(6):1080-1086. PubMed ID: 29803270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reproducibility and Validity of a Semiquantitative Food Frequency Questionnaire in Men Assessed by Multiple Methods. Al-Shaar L; Yuan C; Rosner B; Dean SB; Ivey KL; Clowry CM; Sampson LA; Barnett JB; Rood J; Harnack LJ; Block J; Manson JE; Stampfer MJ; Willett WC; Rimm EB Am J Epidemiol; 2021 Jun; 190(6):1122-1132. PubMed ID: 33350436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pooled results from 5 validation studies of dietary self-report instruments using recovery biomarkers for potassium and sodium intake. Freedman LS; Commins JM; Moler JE; Willett W; Tinker LF; Subar AF; Spiegelman D; Rhodes D; Potischman N; Neuhouser ML; Moshfegh AJ; Kipnis V; Arab L; Prentice RL Am J Epidemiol; 2015 Apr; 181(7):473-87. PubMed ID: 25787264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Nutritional methods in the European Prospective Investigation of Cancer in Norfolk. Bingham SA; Welch AA; McTaggart A; Mulligan AA; Runswick SA; Luben R; Oakes S; Khaw KT; Wareham N; Day NE Public Health Nutr; 2001 Jun; 4(3):847-58. PubMed ID: 11415493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Using biochemical markers to assess the validity of prospective dietary assessment methods and the effect of energy adjustment. Bingham SA; Day NE Am J Clin Nutr; 1997 Apr; 65(4 Suppl):1130S-1137S. PubMed ID: 9094909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validity and reliability of an online self-report 24-h dietary recall method (Intake24): a doubly labelled water study and repeated-measures analysis. Foster E; Lee C; Imamura F; Hollidge SE; Westgate KL; Venables MC; Poliakov I; Rowland MK; Osadchiy T; Bradley JC; Simpson EL; Adamson AJ; Olivier P; Wareham N; Forouhi NG; Brage S J Nutr Sci; 2019; 8():e29. PubMed ID: 31501691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation of a self-administered food-frequency questionnaire administered in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) Study: comparison of energy, protein, and macronutrient intakes estimated with the doubly labeled water, urinary nitrogen, and repeated 24-h dietary recall methods. Kroke A; Klipstein-Grobusch K; Voss S; Möseneder J; Thielecke F; Noack R; Boeing H Am J Clin Nutr; 1999 Oct; 70(4):439-47. PubMed ID: 10500011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation of an automated self-administered 24-hour dietary recall web application against urinary recovery biomarkers in a sample of French-speaking adults of the province of Québec, Canada. Paradis F; Lamarche B; Robitaille J; Couillard C; Lafrenière J; Tremblay AJ; Corneau L; Lemieux S Appl Physiol Nutr Metab; 2022 Feb; 47(2):173-182. PubMed ID: 35057638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of women's diet assessed by FFQs and 24-hour recalls with and without underreporters: associations with biomarkers. Olafsdottir AS; Thorsdottir I; Gunnarsdottir I; Thorgeirsdottir H; Steingrimsdottir L Ann Nutr Metab; 2006; 50(5):450-60. PubMed ID: 16877864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validation of a food frequency questionnaire as a tool for assessing dietary intake in cardiovascular disease research and surveillance in Bangladesh. Mumu SJ; Merom D; Ali L; Fahey PP; Hossain I; Rahman AKMF; Allman-Farinelli M Nutr J; 2020 May; 19(1):42. PubMed ID: 32410632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validating polyphenol intake estimates from a food-frequency questionnaire by using repeated 24-h dietary recalls and a unique method-of-triads approach with 2 biomarkers. Burkholder-Cooley NM; Rajaram SS; Haddad EH; Oda K; Fraser GE; Jaceldo-Siegl K Am J Clin Nutr; 2017 Mar; 105(3):685-694. PubMed ID: 28122784 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Validity of a Dietary Questionnaire Assessed by Comparison With Multiple Weighed Dietary Records or 24-Hour Recalls. Yuan C; Spiegelman D; Rimm EB; Rosner BA; Stampfer MJ; Barnett JB; Chavarro JE; Subar AF; Sampson LK; Willett WC Am J Epidemiol; 2017 Apr; 185(7):570-584. PubMed ID: 28338828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validity of Absolute Intake and Nutrient Density of Protein, Potassium, and Sodium Assessed by Various Dietary Assessment Methods: An Exploratory Study. Trijsburg L; Geelen A; Hulshof PJM; Van't Veer P; Boshuizen HC; Hollman PCH; van Dijk G; Feskens EJM; de Vries JHM Nutrients; 2019 Dec; 12(1):. PubMed ID: 31906097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the 24-Hour Recall as a Reference Instrument for Calibrating Other Self-Report Instruments in Nutritional Cohort Studies: Evidence From the Validation Studies Pooling Project. Freedman LS; Commins JM; Willett W; Tinker LF; Spiegelman D; Rhodes D; Potischman N; Neuhouser ML; Moshfegh AJ; Kipnis V; Baer DJ; Arab L; Prentice RL; Subar AF Am J Epidemiol; 2017 Jul; 186(1):73-82. PubMed ID: 28402488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]