These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29382253)

  • 1. Bacterial promoter prediction: Selection of dynamic and static physical properties of DNA for reliable sequence classification.
    Ryasik A; Orlov M; Zykova E; Ermak T; Sorokin A
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2018 Feb; 16(1):1840003. PubMed ID: 29382253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Some principles in the organization of sigma70-specific promoters on the E. coli genome on the basis of electrostatic patterns of promoter DNA].
    Kamzolova SG; Sorokin AA; Osipov AA; Beskaravaĭnyĭ PM
    Biofizika; 2005; 50(3):444-9. PubMed ID: 15977833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The in silico prediction of promoters in bacterial genomes.
    Towsey M; Hogan JM; Mathews S; Timms P
    Genome Inform; 2007; 19():178-89. PubMed ID: 18546515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. pcPromoter-CNN: A CNN-Based Prediction and Classification of Promoters.
    Shujaat M; Wahab A; Tayara H; Chong KT
    Genes (Basel); 2020 Dec; 11(12):. PubMed ID: 33371507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The recognition and prediction of sigma70 promoters in Escherichia coli K-12.
    Li QZ; Lin H
    J Theor Biol; 2006 Sep; 242(1):135-41. PubMed ID: 16603195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Genome analysis of Escherichia coli promoter sequences evidences that DNA static curvature plays a more important role in gene transcription than has previously been anticipated.
    Olivares-Zavaleta N; Jáuregui R; Merino E
    Genomics; 2006 Mar; 87(3):329-37. PubMed ID: 16413165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. G4PromFinder: an algorithm for predicting transcription promoters in GC-rich bacterial genomes based on AT-rich elements and G-quadruplex motifs.
    Di Salvo M; Pinatel E; Talà A; Fondi M; Peano C; Alifano P
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2018 Feb; 19(1):36. PubMed ID: 29409441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Analysis of the distribution of the nucleotide sequence and electrostatic potential of the Escherichia coli genome].
    Sorokin AA; Osipov AA; Beskaravaĭnyĭ PM; Kamzolova SG
    Biofizika; 2007; 52(2):223-7. PubMed ID: 17477048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bioinformatics resources for the study of gene regulation in bacteria.
    Collado-Vides J; Salgado H; Morett E; Gama-Castro S; Jiménez-Jacinto V; Martínez-Flores I; Medina-Rivera A; Muñiz-Rascado L; Peralta-Gil M; Santos-Zavaleta A
    J Bacteriol; 2009 Jan; 191(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 18978060
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A DNA structural atlas for Escherichia coli.
    Pedersen AG; Jensen LJ; Brunak S; Staerfeldt HH; Ussery DW
    J Mol Biol; 2000 Jun; 299(4):907-30. PubMed ID: 10843847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A novel method for prokaryotic promoter prediction based on DNA stability.
    Kanhere A; Bansal M
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Jan; 6():1. PubMed ID: 15631638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. PlasClass improves plasmid sequence classification.
    Pellow D; Mizrahi I; Shamir R
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2020 Apr; 16(4):e1007781. PubMed ID: 32243433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact of sequence length and number of sequences on promoter prediction performance.
    Carvalho SG; Guerra-Sá R; de C Merschmann LH
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015; 16 Suppl 19(Suppl 19):S5. PubMed ID: 26695879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In silico prediction and functional validation of sigma28-regulated genes in Chlamydia and Escherichia coli.
    Yu HH; Kibler D; Tan M
    J Bacteriol; 2006 Dec; 188(23):8206-12. PubMed ID: 16997971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computational prediction of operons in Synechococcus sp. WH8102.
    Chen X; Su Z; Xu Y; Jiang T
    Genome Inform; 2004; 15(2):211-22. PubMed ID: 15706507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A pattern-based nearest neighbor search approach for promoter prediction using DNA structural profiles.
    Gan Y; Guan J; Zhou S
    Bioinformatics; 2009 Aug; 25(16):2006-12. PubMed ID: 19515962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Recognition of prokaryotic and eukaryotic promoters using convolutional deep learning neural networks.
    Umarov RK; Solovyev VV
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0171410. PubMed ID: 28158264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Curved DNA in promoter sequences.
    Gabrielian AE; Landsman D; Bolshoy A
    In Silico Biol; 1999-2000; 1(4):183-96. PubMed ID: 11479933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Signal-theoretical DNA similarity measure revealing unexpected similarities of E. coli promoters.
    Deyneko IV; Kel AE; Bloecker H; Kauer G
    In Silico Biol; 2005; 5(5-6):547-55. PubMed ID: 16268796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Targets for the MalI repressor at the divergent Escherichia coli K-12 malX-malI promoters.
    Lloyd GS; Godfrey RE; Busby SJ
    FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2010 Apr; 305(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 20141531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.