These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

350 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29382371)

  • 1. Common drug review recommendations for orphan drugs in Canada: basis of recommendations and comparison with similar reviews in Quebec, Australia, Scotland and New Zealand.
    McCormick JI; Berescu LD; Tadros N
    Orphanet J Rare Dis; 2018 Jan; 13(1):27. PubMed ID: 29382371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Health technology assessment of drugs for rare diseases: insights, trends, and reasons for negative recommendations from the CADTH common drug review.
    Janoudi G; Amegatse W; McIntosh B; Sehgal C; Richter T
    Orphanet J Rare Dis; 2016 Dec; 11(1):164. PubMed ID: 27908281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Health technology assessment of new drugs for rare disorders in Canada: impact of disease prevalence and cost.
    Rawson NS
    Orphanet J Rare Dis; 2017 Mar; 12(1):59. PubMed ID: 28330479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Medicine reimbursement recommendations in Canada, Australia, and Scotland.
    Lexchin J; Mintzes B
    Am J Manag Care; 2008 Sep; 14(9):581-8. PubMed ID: 18778173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The correlation between HTA recommendations and reimbursement status of orphan drugs in Europe.
    Kawalec P; Sagan A; Pilc A
    Orphanet J Rare Dis; 2016 Sep; 11(1):122. PubMed ID: 27600717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using effectiveness and cost-effectiveness to make drug coverage decisions: a comparison of Britain, Australia, and Canada.
    Clement FM; Harris A; Li JJ; Yong K; Lee KM; Manns BJ
    JAMA; 2009 Oct; 302(13):1437-43. PubMed ID: 19809025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influencing Factors of Health Technology Assessment to Orphan Drugs: Empirical Evidence in England, Scotland, Canada, and Australia.
    Zhou N; Ji H; Li Z; Hu J; Xie JH; Feng YH; Yuan N
    Front Public Health; 2022; 10():861067. PubMed ID: 35784205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Factors associated with positive and negative recommendations for cancer and non-cancer drugs for rare diseases in Canada.
    Nagase FNI; Stafinski T; Sun J; Jhangri G; Menon D
    Orphanet J Rare Dis; 2019 Jun; 14(1):127. PubMed ID: 31174574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Alignment of health technology assessments and price negotiations for new drugs for rare disorders in Canada: Does it lead to improved patient access?
    Rawson NSB
    J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol; 2020 Feb; 27(1):e48-e64. PubMed ID: 32124580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Same drugs, valued differently? Comparing comparators and methods used in reimbursement recommendations in Australia, Canada, and Korea.
    Bae G; Bae EY; Bae S
    Health Policy; 2015 May; 119(5):577-87. PubMed ID: 25666339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Why do health technology assessment coverage recommendations for the same drugs differ across settings? Applying a mixed methods framework to systematically compare orphan drug decisions in four European countries.
    Nicod E
    Eur J Health Econ; 2017 Jul; 18(6):715-730. PubMed ID: 27538758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Case Studies: Factors Influencing Divergent HTA Reimbursement Recommendations in Australia, Canada, England, and Scotland.
    Allen N; Walker SR; Liberti L; Salek S
    Value Health; 2017 Mar; 20(3):320-328. PubMed ID: 28292476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Do Reimbursement Recommendations by the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technology in Health Translate Into Coverage Decisions for Orphan Drugs in the Canadian Province of Ontario?
    Fontrier AM; Kanavos P
    Value Health; 2023 Jul; 26(7):1011-1021. PubMed ID: 36889379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Health technology assessment and price negotiation alignment for rare disorder drugs in Canada: Who benefits?
    Rawson NSB
    Orphanet J Rare Dis; 2022 Jun; 17(1):218. PubMed ID: 35698235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical benefit, reimbursement outcomes, and prices of FDA-approved cancer drugs reviewed through Project Orbis in the USA, Canada, England, and Scotland: a retrospective, comparative analysis.
    Jenei K; Gentilini A; Haslam A; Prasad V
    Lancet Oncol; 2024 Aug; 25(8):979-988. PubMed ID: 39004098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Activities of the pan-Canadian Pharmaceutical Alliance: An Observational Analysis.
    Rocchi A; Mills F
    J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol; 2018 Aug; 25(2):e12-e22. PubMed ID: 30725539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Systematic review on the evaluation criteria of orphan medicines in Central and Eastern European countries.
    Zelei T; Molnár MJ; Szegedi M; Kaló Z
    Orphanet J Rare Dis; 2016 Jun; 11(1):72. PubMed ID: 27259284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Can Standard Health Technology Assessment Approaches Help Guide the Price of Orphan Drugs in Canada? A Review of Submissions to the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health Common Drug Review.
    Balijepalli C; Gullapalli L; Druyts E; Yan K; Desai K; Barakat S; Locklin J
    Clinicoecon Outcomes Res; 2020; 12():445-457. PubMed ID: 32922050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reimbursement Status and Recommendations Related to Orphan Drugs in European Countries.
    Stawowczyk E; Malinowski KP; Kawalec P; Bobiński R; Siwiec J; Panteli D; Eckhardt H; Simoens S; Agusti A; Dooms M; Pilc A
    Front Pharmacol; 2019; 10():1279. PubMed ID: 31827433
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. What impact does 'conventional' economic evaluation have on patient access to new orphan medicines? A comparative study of their reimbursement in Australia (2005-2012).
    Wonder M; Chin G
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2015; 15(5):843-50. PubMed ID: 25938794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.