These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29382918)

  • 21. Prospective comparative study of tolerance to refractive errors after implantation of extended depth of focus and monofocal intraocular lenses with identical aspheric platform in Korean population.
    Son HS; Kim SH; Auffarth GU; Choi CY
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2019 Aug; 19(1):187. PubMed ID: 31426775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Modified monovision with spherical aberration to improve presbyopic through-focus visual performance.
    Zheleznyak L; Sabesan R; Oh JS; MacRae S; Yoon G
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 May; 54(5):3157-65. PubMed ID: 23557742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Objective depth-of-focus is different from subjective depth-of-focus and correlated with accommodative microfluctuations.
    Yao P; Lin H; Huang J; Chu R; Jiang BC
    Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(13):1266-73. PubMed ID: 20399223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Impact of corneal aberrations on through-focus image quality of presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses using an adaptive optics bench system.
    Zheleznyak L; Kim MJ; MacRae S; Yoon G
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Oct; 38(10):1724-33. PubMed ID: 22902188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of three different presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses.
    Serdiuk V; Ustymenko S; Fokina S; Ivantsov I
    Rom J Ophthalmol; 2020; 64(4):364-379. PubMed ID: 33367174
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluation of image quality metrics for the prediction of subjective best focus.
    Kilintari M; Pallikaris A; Tsiklis N; Ginis HS
    Optom Vis Sci; 2010 Mar; 87(3):183-9. PubMed ID: 20125061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [How to correct presbyopia].
    Pereleux A
    Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol; 1997; 264():63-6. PubMed ID: 9490158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Refractive extended depth-of-focus lens design based on periodic power profile for presbyopia correction.
    Lyu J; Bang SP; Yoon G
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2024 Mar; 44(2):301-310. PubMed ID: 37984831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Spherical aberration gauge for human vision.
    Pixton BM; Greivenkamp JE
    Appl Opt; 2010 Oct; 49(30):5906-13. PubMed ID: 20962957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of optical quality metrics to predict subjective quality of vision after laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Bühren J; Pesudovs K; Martin T; Strenger A; Yoon G; Kohnen T
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 May; 35(5):846-55. PubMed ID: 19393883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Wavefront aberrations, depth of focus, and contrast sensitivity with aspheric and spherical intraocular lenses: fellow-eye study.
    Nanavaty MA; Spalton DJ; Boyce J; Saha S; Marshall J
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Apr; 35(4):663-71. PubMed ID: 19304086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Is an objective refraction optimised using the visual Strehl ratio better than a subjective refraction?
    Hastings GD; Marsack JD; Nguyen LC; Cheng H; Applegate RA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 May; 37(3):317-325. PubMed ID: 28370389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Predicting visual acuity from wavefront aberrations.
    Watson AB; Ahumada AJ
    J Vis; 2008 Apr; 8(4):17.1-19. PubMed ID: 18484856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Subjective depth-of-focus of the eye.
    Atchison DA; Charman WN; Woods RL
    Optom Vis Sci; 1997 Jul; 74(7):511-20. PubMed ID: 9293519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Short-term comparison between extended depth-of-focus prototype contact lenses and a commercially-available center-near multifocal.
    Tilia D; Munro A; Chung J; Sha J; Delaney S; Kho D; Thomas V; Ehrmann K; Bakaraju RC
    J Optom; 2017; 10(1):14-25. PubMed ID: 27161603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Assessment of the image quality of extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens models in polychromatic light.
    Lee Y; Łabuz G; Son HS; Yildirim TM; Khoramnia R; Auffarth GU
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2020 Jan; 46(1):108-115. PubMed ID: 32050240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Implantation of scleral expansion band segments for the treatment of presbyopia.
    Qazi MA; Pepose JS; Shuster JJ
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2002 Dec; 134(6):808-15. PubMed ID: 12470747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of visual results and optical quality of two presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses: TECNIS symfony versus TECNIS synergy.
    Shin DE; Lee H; Kim TI; Koh K
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2022 Nov; 32(6):3461-3469. PubMed ID: 35410507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A Comparative Evaluation of Diffractive Trifocal and New Refractive/Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses for Refractive Lens Exchange.
    Ozulken K; Kiziltoprak H; Yuksel E; Mumcuoğlu T
    Curr Eye Res; 2021 Jun; 46(6):811-817. PubMed ID: 33047991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Subjective depth of field in presence of 4th-order and 6th-order Zernike spherical aberration using adaptive optics technology.
    Benard Y; Lopez-Gil N; Legras R
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Dec; 36(12):2129-38. PubMed ID: 21111317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.