These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29383818)

  • 1. A recursive partitioning approach for subgroup identification in individual patient data meta-analysis.
    Mistry D; Stallard N; Underwood M
    Stat Med; 2018 Apr; 37(9):1550-1561. PubMed ID: 29383818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Statistical approaches to identify subgroups in meta-analysis of individual participant data: a simulation study.
    Belias M; Rovers MM; Reitsma JB; Debray TPA; IntHout J
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Sep; 19(1):183. PubMed ID: 31477023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Exercise therapy for chronic low back pain: protocol for an individual participant data meta-analysis.
    Hayden JA; Cartwright JL; Riley RD; Vantulder MW;
    Syst Rev; 2012 Dec; 1():64. PubMed ID: 23259855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of aggregate and individual participant data approaches to meta-analysis of randomised trials: An observational study.
    Tierney JF; Fisher DJ; Burdett S; Stewart LA; Parmar MKB
    PLoS Med; 2020 Jan; 17(1):e1003019. PubMed ID: 32004320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Subgroup analyses in randomised controlled trials: quantifying the risks of false-positives and false-negatives.
    Brookes ST; Whitley E; Peters TJ; Mulheran PA; Egger M; Davey Smith G
    Health Technol Assess; 2001; 5(33):1-56. PubMed ID: 11701102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Empirical comparison of subgroup effects in conventional and individual patient data meta-analyses.
    Koopman L; van der Heijden GJ; Hoes AW; Grobbee DE; Rovers MM
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2008; 24(3):358-61. PubMed ID: 18601805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of the statistical performance of different meta-analysis models for the synthesis of subgroup effects from randomized clinical trials.
    da Costa BR; Sutton AJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Oct; 19(1):198. PubMed ID: 31655550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Meta-analysis of a continuous outcome combining individual patient data and aggregate data: a method based on simulated individual patient data.
    Yamaguchi Y; Sakamoto W; Goto M; Staessen JA; Wang J; Gueyffier F; Riley RD
    Res Synth Methods; 2014 Dec; 5(4):322-51. PubMed ID: 26052956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. One-stage individual participant data meta-analysis models: estimation of treatment-covariate interactions must avoid ecological bias by separating out within-trial and across-trial information.
    Hua H; Burke DL; Crowther MJ; Ensor J; Tudur Smith C; Riley RD
    Stat Med; 2017 Feb; 36(5):772-789. PubMed ID: 27910122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cumulative subgroup analysis to reduce waste in clinical research for individualised medicine.
    Song F; Bachmann MO
    BMC Med; 2016 Dec; 14(1):197. PubMed ID: 27974045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Identification of subgroup effect with an individual participant data meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of three different types of therapist-delivered care in low back pain.
    Hee SW; Mistry D; Friede T; Lamb SE; Stallard N; Underwood M; Patel S;
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2021 Feb; 22(1):191. PubMed ID: 33593341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Simulation-based power calculations for planning a two-stage individual participant data meta-analysis.
    Ensor J; Burke DL; Snell KIE; Hemming K; Riley RD
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 May; 18(1):41. PubMed ID: 29776399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Meta-analysis using individual participant data: one-stage and two-stage approaches, and why they may differ.
    Burke DL; Ensor J; Riley RD
    Stat Med; 2017 Feb; 36(5):855-875. PubMed ID: 27747915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Combining individual patient data and aggregate data in mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis: Individual patient data may be beneficial if only for a subset of trials.
    Donegan S; Williamson P; D'Alessandro U; Garner P; Smith CT
    Stat Med; 2013 Mar; 32(6):914-30. PubMed ID: 22987606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Individual participant data meta-analysis to examine interactions between treatment effect and participant-level covariates: Statistical recommendations for conduct and planning.
    Riley RD; Debray TPA; Fisher D; Hattle M; Marlin N; Hoogland J; Gueyffier F; Staessen JA; Wang J; Moons KGM; Reitsma JB; Ensor J
    Stat Med; 2020 Jul; 39(15):2115-2137. PubMed ID: 32350891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of multiple covariates in assessing treatment-effect modifiers: A methodological review of individual participant data meta-analyses.
    Godolphin PJ; Marlin N; Cornett C; Fisher DJ; Tierney JF; White IR; RogoziƄska E
    Res Synth Methods; 2024 Jan; 15(1):107-116. PubMed ID: 37771175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. IPDmada: An R Shiny tool for analyzing and visualizing individual patient data meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy.
    Wang J; Keusters WR; Wen L; Leeflang MMG
    Res Synth Methods; 2021 Jan; 12(1):45-54. PubMed ID: 32808437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A critical review of methods for the assessment of patient-level interactions in individual participant data meta-analysis of randomized trials, and guidance for practitioners.
    Fisher DJ; Copas AJ; Tierney JF; Parmar MK
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Sep; 64(9):949-67. PubMed ID: 21411280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of biomarkers for treatment selection using individual participant data from multiple clinical trials.
    Kang C; Janes H; Tajik P; Groen H; Mol B; Koopmans C; Broekhuijsen K; Zwertbroek E; van Pampus M; Franssen M
    Stat Med; 2018 Apr; 37(9):1439-1453. PubMed ID: 29444553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluating the quality of subgroup analyses in randomized controlled trials of therapist-delivered interventions for nonspecific low back pain: a systematic review.
    Mistry D; Patel S; Hee SW; Stallard N; Underwood M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Apr; 39(7):618-29. PubMed ID: 24480951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.