These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29383882)

  • 1. Probability Theory Plus Noise: Descriptive Estimation and Inferential Judgment.
    Costello F; Watts P
    Top Cogn Sci; 2018 Jan; 10(1):192-208. PubMed ID: 29383882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Random variation and systematic biases in probability estimation.
    Howe R; Costello F
    Cogn Psychol; 2020 Dec; 123():101306. PubMed ID: 33189032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. People's conditional probability judgments follow probability theory (plus noise).
    Costello F; Watts P
    Cogn Psychol; 2016 Sep; 89():106-33. PubMed ID: 27570097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Surprisingly rational: probability theory plus noise explains biases in judgment.
    Costello F; Watts P
    Psychol Rev; 2014 Jul; 121(3):463-80. PubMed ID: 25090427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Probability theory plus noise: Replies to Crupi and Tentori (2016) and to Nilsson, Juslin, and Winman (2016).
    Costello F; Watts P
    Psychol Rev; 2016 Jan; 123(1):112-23. PubMed ID: 26709415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Surprising rationality in probability judgment: Assessing two competing models.
    Costello F; Watts P; Fisher C
    Cognition; 2018 Jan; 170():280-297. PubMed ID: 29096329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Invariants in probabilistic reasoning.
    Costello F; Watts P
    Cogn Psychol; 2018 Feb; 100():1-16. PubMed ID: 29220640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Heuristics can produce surprisingly rational probability estimates: Comment on Costello and Watts (2014).
    Nilsson H; Juslin P; Winman A
    Psychol Rev; 2016 Jan; 123(1):103-11. PubMed ID: 26709414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comments on quantum probability theory.
    Sloman S
    Top Cogn Sci; 2014 Jan; 6(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 24482328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Individual differences in the perception of probability.
    Khaw MW; Stevens L; Woodford M
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2021 Apr; 17(4):e1008871. PubMed ID: 33793574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Naive probability: a mental model theory of extensional reasoning.
    Johnson-Laird PN; Legrenzi P; Girotto V; Legrenzi MS; Caverni JP
    Psychol Rev; 1999 Jan; 106(1):62-88. PubMed ID: 10197363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Probability in reasoning: a developmental test on conditionals.
    Barrouillet P; Gauffroy C
    Cognition; 2015 Apr; 137():22-39. PubMed ID: 25590946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Bayesian sampler: Generic Bayesian inference causes incoherence in human probability judgments.
    Zhu JQ; Sanborn AN; Chater N
    Psychol Rev; 2020 Oct; 127(5):719-748. PubMed ID: 32191073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing the chances of success: naïve statistics versus kind experience.
    Hogarth RM; Mukherjee K; Soyer E
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jan; 39(1):14-32. PubMed ID: 22686845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Probabilistic mental models: a Brunswikian theory of confidence.
    Gigerenzer G; Hoffrage U; Kleinbölting H
    Psychol Rev; 1991 Oct; 98(4):506-28. PubMed ID: 1961771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adaptive Anchoring Model: How Static and Dynamic Presentations of Time Series Influence Judgments and Predictions.
    Kusev P; van Schaik P; Tsaneva-Atanasova K; Juliusson A; Chater N
    Cogn Sci; 2018 Jan; 42(1):77-102. PubMed ID: 28382639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diagnostic causal reasoning with verbal information.
    Meder B; Mayrhofer R
    Cogn Psychol; 2017 Aug; 96():54-84. PubMed ID: 28623726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A quantum theory account of order effects and conjunction fallacies in political judgments.
    Yearsley JM; Trueblood JS
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Aug; 25(4):1517-1525. PubMed ID: 28879495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is there something special with probabilities?--insight vs. computational ability in multiple risk combination.
    Juslin P; Lindskog M; Mayerhofer B
    Cognition; 2015 Mar; 136():282-303. PubMed ID: 25514208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Probability theory, not the very guide of life.
    Juslin P; Nilsson H; Winman A
    Psychol Rev; 2009 Oct; 116(4):856-74. PubMed ID: 19839686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.