These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29384608)

  • 1. Audiovisual Integration of Time-to-Contact Information for Approaching Objects.
    DeLucia PR; Preddy D; Oberfeld D
    Multisens Res; 2016; 29(4-5):365-95. PubMed ID: 29384608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimating the relative weights of visual and auditory tau versus heuristic-based cues for time-to-contact judgments in realistic, familiar scenes by older and younger adults.
    Keshavarz B; Campos JL; DeLucia PR; Oberfeld D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Apr; 79(3):929-944. PubMed ID: 28097504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Musicians have enhanced audiovisual multisensory binding: experience-dependent effects in the double-flash illusion.
    Bidelman GM
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Oct; 234(10):3037-47. PubMed ID: 27334887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Time-to-contact judgments of an approaching object that is partially concealed by an occluder.
    DeLucia PR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Apr; 30(2):287-304. PubMed ID: 15053689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visual processing of the impending collision of a looming object: time to collision revisited.
    Yan JJ; Lorv B; Li H; Sun HJ
    J Vis; 2011 Oct; 11(12):. PubMed ID: 22003252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Degradation of labial information modifies audiovisual speech perception in cochlear-implanted children.
    Huyse A; Berthommier F; Leybaert J
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):110-21. PubMed ID: 23059850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Auditory pitch glides influence time-to-contact judgements of visual stimuli.
    King C; Prime SL
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 Aug; 237(8):1907-1917. PubMed ID: 31104086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Time course of auditory masker effects: tapping the locus of audiovisual integration?
    Steenken R; Diederich A; Colonius H
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Apr; 435(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 18355963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The unity assumption facilitates cross-modal binding of musical, non-speech stimuli: The role of spectral and amplitude envelope cues.
    Chuen L; Schutz M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Jul; 78(5):1512-28. PubMed ID: 27084701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bimodal-divided attention attenuates visually induced inhibition of return with audiovisual targets.
    Tang X; Gao Y; Yang W; Ren Y; Wu J; Zhang M; Wu Q
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 Apr; 237(4):1093-1107. PubMed ID: 30770958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Presentation Probability of Visual-Auditory Pairs Modulates Visually Induced Auditory Predictions.
    Stuckenberg MV; Schröger E; Widmann A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2019 Aug; 31(8):1110-1125. PubMed ID: 30912727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does Number of Perceptions or Cross-Modal Auditory Cueing Influence Audiovisual Processing Speed?
    Altieri N; Wenger MJ; Wallace MT; Stevenson RA
    Am J Psychol; 2016; 129(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 27029103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Influence of auditory object formation by multimodal interaction].
    Rahne T
    HNO; 2013 Mar; 61(3):202-10. PubMed ID: 23241857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Auditory capture of visual apparent motion, both laterally and looming.
    McBeath MK; Addie JD; Krynen RC
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Feb; 193():105-112. PubMed ID: 30602130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual Mislocalization of Moving Objects in an Audiovisual Event.
    Kawachi Y
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(4):e0154147. PubMed ID: 27111759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of optic expansion rates when judging the relative time to contact of familiar objects.
    Hosking SG; Crassini B
    J Vis; 2011 May; 11(6):. PubMed ID: 21628397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Overestimated time-to-collision for quiet vehicles: Evidence from a study using a novel audiovisual virtual-reality system for traffic scenarios.
    Oberfeld D; Wessels M; Büttner D
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Sep; 175():106778. PubMed ID: 35878469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Audiovisual integration increases the intentional step synchronization of side-by-side walkers.
    Noy D; Mouta S; Lamas J; Basso D; Silva C; Santos JA
    Hum Mov Sci; 2017 Dec; 56(Pt B):71-87. PubMed ID: 29107820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Judgments of relative time-to-contact of more than two approaching objects: toward a method.
    DeLucia PR; Novak JB
    Percept Psychophys; 1997 Aug; 59(6):913-28. PubMed ID: 9270365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Altered temporal profile of visual-auditory multisensory interactions in dyslexia.
    Hairston WD; Burdette JH; Flowers DL; Wood FB; Wallace MT
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Oct; 166(3-4):474-80. PubMed ID: 16028030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.