These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

328 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29385460)

  • 1. Weighting genomic and genealogical information for genetic parameter estimation and breeding value prediction in tropical beef cattle.
    Raidan FSS; Porto-Neto LR; Li Y; Lehnert SA; Reverter A
    J Anim Sci; 2018 Mar; 96(2):612-617. PubMed ID: 29385460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of rare alleles on estimated genomic relationships from whole genome sequence data.
    Eynard SE; Windig JJ; Leroy G; van Binsbergen R; Calus MP
    BMC Genet; 2015 Mar; 16():24. PubMed ID: 25887220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of genomic predictions using genomic relationship matrices built with different weighting factors to account for locus-specific variances.
    Su G; Christensen OF; Janss L; Lund MS
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 Oct; 97(10):6547-59. PubMed ID: 25129495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On the distance of genetic relationships and the accuracy of genomic prediction in pig breeding.
    Meuwissen TH; Odegard J; Andersen-Ranberg I; Grindflek E
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Aug; 46(1):49. PubMed ID: 25158793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Metafounder approach for single-step genomic evaluations of Red Dairy cattle.
    Kudinov AA; Mäntysaari EA; Aamand GP; Uimari P; Strandén I
    J Dairy Sci; 2020 Jul; 103(7):6299-6310. PubMed ID: 32418688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Compression distance can discriminate animals by genetic profile, build relationship matrices and estimate breeding values.
    Hudson NJ; Porto-Neto L; Kijas JW; Reverter A
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Oct; 47():78. PubMed ID: 26464167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of predicting genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in Angus and Charolais beef cattle.
    Chen L; Schenkel F; Vinsky M; Crews DH; Li C
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Oct; 91(10):4669-78. PubMed ID: 24078618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genomic analysis of dominance effects on milk production and conformation traits in Fleckvieh cattle.
    Ertl J; Legarra A; Vitezica ZG; Varona L; Edel C; Emmerling R; Götz KU
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Jun; 46(1):40. PubMed ID: 24962065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of genomic selection for a sib-evaluated trait using identity-by-state and identity-by-descent relationships.
    Vela-Avitúa S; Meuwissen TH; Luan T; Ødegård J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Feb; 47(1):9. PubMed ID: 25888184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimation of genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in a multibreed cattle population.
    Khansefid M; Pryce JE; Bolormaa S; Miller SP; Wang Z; Li C; Goddard ME
    J Anim Sci; 2014 Aug; 92(8):3270-83. PubMed ID: 25074450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Strategies for accommodating gene-edited sires and their descendants in genetic evaluations.
    Sanglard LP; See GM; Spangler ML
    J Anim Sci; 2023 Jan; 101():. PubMed ID: 36897830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficient and accurate computation of base generation allele frequencies.
    Aldridge MN; Vandenplas J; Calus MPL
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Feb; 102(2):1364-1373. PubMed ID: 30471906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genomic predictions of growth curves in Holstein dairy cattle based on parameter estimates from nonlinear models combined with different kernel functions.
    Yin T; König S
    J Dairy Sci; 2020 Aug; 103(8):7222-7237. PubMed ID: 32534925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Efficiency of multi-breed genomic selection for dairy cattle breeds with different sizes of reference population.
    Hozé C; Fritz S; Phocas F; Boichard D; Ducrocq V; Croiseau P
    J Dairy Sci; 2014; 97(6):3918-29. PubMed ID: 24704232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accounting for trait architecture in genomic predictions of US Holstein cattle using a weighted realized relationship matrix.
    Tiezzi F; Maltecca C
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Apr; 47(1):24. PubMed ID: 25886167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of QTL minor allele frequency on genomic evaluation using real genotype data and simulated phenotypes in Japanese Black cattle.
    Uemoto Y; Sasaki S; Kojima T; Sugimoto Y; Watanabe T
    BMC Genet; 2015 Nov; 16():134. PubMed ID: 26586567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimates of missing heritability for complex traits in Brown Swiss cattle.
    Román-Ponce SI; Samoré AB; Dolezal MA; Bagnato A; Meuwissen TH
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Jun; 46(1):36. PubMed ID: 24898214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Current status of genomic evaluation.
    Misztal I; Lourenco D; Legarra A
    J Anim Sci; 2020 Apr; 98(4):. PubMed ID: 32267923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of genomic selection for age at puberty in a multi-breed population of tropically adapted beef cattle.
    Farah MM; Swan AA; Fortes MR; Fonseca R; Moore SS; Kelly MJ
    Anim Genet; 2016 Feb; 47(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 26490440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Utility of multi-omics data to inform genomic prediction of heifer fertility traits.
    Tahir MS; Porto-Neto LR; Reverter-Gomez T; Olasege BS; Sajid MR; Wockner KB; Tan AWL; Fortes MRS
    J Anim Sci; 2022 Dec; 100(12):. PubMed ID: 36239447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.