These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29386410)

  • 1. Success in Publishing: Selecting an Appropriate Journal and Braving the Peer-review Process.
    Tullu MS; Karande S
    J Postgrad Med; 2018; 64(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 29386410
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Retaining and Rewarding Journal Peer Reviewers.
    Coupal TM; Munk PL; Lapeña JFF; Peh WCG
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 2018 Nov; 69(4):346-348. PubMed ID: 30390958
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact, orthodoxy and peer review.
    Ritter JM
    Br J Clin Pharmacol; 2011 Sep; 72(3):367-8. PubMed ID: 21824176
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The inaugural
    Adinortey CA; Dolan SK; Doore S; Lijek R; Pires DP; Yu W; Draganova EB; Schada von Borzyskowski L
    mBio; 2024 Jan; 15(1):e0199123. PubMed ID: 38099716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Peer review as a measurable responsibility of those who publish: The peer review debt index.
    Fiedorowicz JG; Kleinstäuber M; Lemogne C; Löwe B; Ola B; Sutin A; Wong S; Fabiano N; Tilburg MV; Mikocka-Walus A
    J Psychosom Res; 2022 Oct; 161():110997. PubMed ID: 35952404
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Enhancements in peer review of manuscripts by the Journal.
    Liesegang TJ
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Jul; 158(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 24929824
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Open peer review, pros and cons from the perspective of an early career researcher.
    Henriquez T
    mBio; 2023 Oct; 14(5):e0194823. PubMed ID: 37811986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Training the next generation of peer reviewers: Steps for guiding pharmacy learners through the peer review process.
    Johnson PN; Parman A; Miller JL
    Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2024 Feb; 81(5):e137-e140. PubMed ID: 37946575
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Publishing: Journals could share peer-review data.
    Squazzoni F; Grimaldo F; Marušić A
    Nature; 2017 Jun; 546(7658):352. PubMed ID: 28617464
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Selecting a journal for your manuscript: A 4-step process.
    Sharifi C; Buccheri RK
    J Prof Nurs; 2020; 36(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 32044059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reviewer training for improving grant and journal peer review.
    Hesselberg JO; Dalsbø TK; Stromme H; Svege I; Fretheim A
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2023 Nov; 11(11):MR000056. PubMed ID: 38014743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Peer review: an essential step in the publishing process.
    Weil J
    J Genet Couns; 2004 Jun; 13(3):183-7. PubMed ID: 15617209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dental publishing: Peer review reviewed.
    Bal AM; Mahawar KK
    Br Dent J; 2016 Dec; 221(11):686. PubMed ID: 27932847
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Peer Review, Confidential Comments to the Editor, and the Golden Rule.
    Swanson E
    Ann Plast Surg; 2023 Jan; 90(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 36409929
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How to select a journal for your research.
    Ramia JM
    World J Gastroenterol; 2023 Jun; 29(21):3379-3384. PubMed ID: 37377587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Journal Publishing: A Review of the Basics.
    Kennedy MS
    Semin Oncol Nurs; 2018 Nov; 34(4):361-371. PubMed ID: 30266551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [On publication language and international publishing, success of Professor Özaydın and Anatolian Journal of Cardiology, peer-review and academic depression].
    Timuralp B
    Anadolu Kardiyol Derg; 2013 May; 13(3):202-3. PubMed ID: 23676661
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improving peer review: What authors can do.
    Baker WL; DiDomenico RJ; Haines ST
    Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2017 Dec; 74(24):2076-2079. PubMed ID: 29074481
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The usefulness of peer review for selecting manuscripts for publication: a utility analysis taking as an example a high-impact journal.
    Bornmann L; Daniel HD
    PLoS One; 2010 Jun; 5(6):e11344. PubMed ID: 20596540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Upon Further Review: Peer Process Vital to Publishing.
    Katz A
    Oncol Nurs Forum; 2016 Nov; 43(6):675-676. PubMed ID: 27768133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.