172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29386619)
21. Catquest-9SF questionnaire: Validation in a Greek-speaking population using Rasch analysis.
Nanos P; Kouteliari V; Panagiotopoulou EK; Papadopoulos N; Ntonti P; Labiris G
PLoS One; 2022; 17(12):e0278683. PubMed ID: 36477289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Assessment of Cataract Surgery Outcome Using the Modified Catquest Short-Form Instrument in China.
Khadka J; Huang J; Chen H; Chen C; Gao R; Bao F; Zhang S; Wang Q; Pesudovs K
PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0164182. PubMed ID: 27736889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Validity of the French version of Catquest-9SF and use of an electronic notepad for entering patient-reported outcome measures.
Katz G; Rouquette A; Lignereux F; Mourgues T; Weber M; Lundström M
Eye Vis (Lond); 2021 Apr; 8(1):11. PubMed ID: 33789766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The Italian Catquest-9SF cataract questionnaire: translation, validation and application.
Skiadaresi E; Ravalico G; Polizzi S; Lundström M; González-Andrades M; McAlinden C
Eye Vis (Lond); 2016; 3():12. PubMed ID: 27127797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The effect of phacoemulsification on visual function among Filipino cataract patients measured by a validated Filipino translation of Catquest-9SF.
Negre GCMP; Martinez JMD
BMC Ophthalmol; 2023 Jul; 23(1):327. PubMed ID: 37464320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Validation of Catquest-9SF questionnaire in a Chinese cataract population.
Lin X; Li M; Wang M; Zuo Y; Zhu S; Zheng Y; Lin X; Yu M; Lamoureux EL
PLoS One; 2014; 9(8):e103860. PubMed ID: 25084020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Catquest-9SF questionnaire: validation of the Portuguese version using the Rasch analysis.
Antunes HM; Magalhães LC; Vasconcelos GC; Trindade BLC; Gonzaga ACM; Antunes RPG
Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2023; 86(2):156-163. PubMed ID: 35170660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Physician and patient concordance in reporting of appropriateness and prioritization for cataract surgery.
Schlenker MB; Samet S; Lim M; D'Silva C; Reid RJ; Ahmed IIK
PLoS One; 2021; 16(6):e0253210. PubMed ID: 34170915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Validation of the Spanish Catquest-9SF in patients with a monofocal or trifocal intraocular lens.
Lundström M; Llovet F; Llovet A; Martinez Del Pozo M; Mompean B; González JV; Pesudovs K
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Dec; 42(12):1791-1796. PubMed ID: 28007111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Catquest-9SF functioning over a decade - a study from the Swedish National Cataract Register.
Lundström M; Kugelberg M; Montan P; Nilsson I; Zetterberg M; Pesudovs K; Behndig A
Eye Vis (Lond); 2020 Dec; 7(1):56. PubMed ID: 33292703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Predicting changes in cataract surgery health outcomes using a cataract surgery appropriateness and prioritization instrument.
Lim ME; Minotti SC; D'Silva C; Reid RJ; Schlenker MB; Ahmed IK
PLoS One; 2021; 16(1):e0246104. PubMed ID: 33507910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A head-to-head comparison of 16 cataract surgery outcome questionnaires.
McAlinden C; Gothwal VK; Khadka J; Wright TA; Lamoureux EL; Pesudovs K
Ophthalmology; 2011 Dec; 118(12):2374-81. PubMed ID: 21945088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Global multi-site, prospective analysis of cataract surgery outcomes following ICHOM standards: the European CAT-Community.
Zijlmans BL; van Zijderveld R; Manzulli M; Garay-Aramburu G; Czapski P; Eter N; Diener R; Torras J; Tognetto D; Giglio R; De Giacinto C; Fernandez J; O'Donnell C; Piñero DP; ; Knitel A; Bergado-Mijangos R; Coello-Ojeda D; Ozaeta I; Macias-Murelaga B; Fierro JG; Dalmasso CE; Garcia-Gómez PJ; Himanka M; Martínez J; Chang-Sotomayor M; Camós-Carreras A; Spencer F; Sabater-Cruz N; Scardellato C; Dell'Aquila C; Pian G
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2021 Jul; 259(7):1897-1905. PubMed ID: 33855602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Ontario Cataract Quality Outcome Initiative: appropriateness and prioritization of cataract surgery.
Hatch WV; Leung V; Ahmed I; Schlenker M; Babaei Omali N; Pope K; Lebovic G; McReelis K; Delpero W; Campbell RJ; ; El Defrawy S
Can J Ophthalmol; 2023 Aug; 58(4):382-390. PubMed ID: 35792177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Study of possible predictors associated with self-assessed visual function after cataract surgery.
Rönbeck M; Lundström M; Kugelberg M
Ophthalmology; 2011 Sep; 118(9):1732-8. PubMed ID: 21715013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Patient-reported outcome measuring tools in cataract surgery: Clinical comparison at a tertiary hospital.
Fung SS; Luis J; Hussain B; Bunce C; Hingorani M; Hancox J
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Dec; 42(12):1759-1767. PubMed ID: 28007107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Perception of visual outcomes in patients after delayed compared with immediately sequential bilateral cataract surgery.
Arsenault R; Hébert M; You E; Légaré ME; Mercier M
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2023 Feb; 49(2):148-153. PubMed ID: 36100135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effects of clinical parameters on patient-reported outcome in cataract patients: a multicentre study.
Stolk-Vos AC; Visser MS; Klijn S; Timman R; Lansink P; Nuijts R; Tjia K; Zijlmans B; Kranenburg LW; Busschbach JV; Reus NJ
Acta Ophthalmol; 2018 Sep; 96(6):586-591. PubMed ID: 29575507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Cataract standard set for outcome measures: An Italian tertiary referral centre experience.
Tognetto D; Giglio R; De Giacinto C; Dell'Aquila C; Pian G; Scardellato C; Piñero DP
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2021 May; ():11206721211018370. PubMed ID: 34053333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The impact of corneal guttata on the results of cataract surgery.
Viberg A; Liv P; Behndig A; Lundström M; Byström B
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2019 Jun; 45(6):803-809. PubMed ID: 30967299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
