These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29386786)
1. Evaluation of the incidence of microcracks caused by Mtwo and ProTaper Next rotary file systems versus the self-adjusting file: A scanning electron microscopic study. Saha SG; Vijaywargiya N; Saxena D; Saha MK; Bharadwaj A; Dubey S J Conserv Dent; 2017; 20(5):355-359. PubMed ID: 29386786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of reciprocating file motion on microcrack formation in root canals: an SEM study. Ashwinkumar V; Krithikadatta J; Surendran S; Velmurugan N Int Endod J; 2014 Jul; 47(7):622-7. PubMed ID: 24107320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of self-adjusting file, Mtwo, and ProTaper on the root canal wall. Hin ES; Wu MK; Wesselink PR; Shemesh H J Endod; 2013 Feb; 39(2):262-4. PubMed ID: 23321242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of microcrack formation in root canals after instrumentation with different NiTi rotary file systems: a scanning electron microscopy study. Çiçek E; Koçak MM; Sağlam BC; Koçak S Scanning; 2015; 37(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 25488126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Comparative SEM Investigation of Smear Layer Remaining on Dentinal Walls by Three Rotary NiTi Files with Different Cross Sectional Designs in Moderately Curved Canals. Sharma G; Kakkar P; Vats A J Clin Diagn Res; 2015 Mar; 9(3):ZC43-7. PubMed ID: 25954704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dentinal microcrack formation during root canal preparations by different NiTi rotary instruments and the self-adjusting file. Yoldas O; Yilmaz S; Atakan G; Kuden C; Kasan Z J Endod; 2012 Feb; 38(2):232-5. PubMed ID: 22244643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Retracted: Evaluation of the incidence of microcracks caused by Mtwo and ProTaper NEXT rotary file systems versus the Self Adjusting File: a scanning electron microscopic study. Saha SG; Vijaywargiya N; Dubey S; Saxena D; Kala S Int Endod J; 2016 Sep; 49(9):911. PubMed ID: 26599835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. "Dentinal microcracks after root canal preparation" a comparative evaluation with hand, rotary and reciprocating instrumentation. Priya NT; Chandrasekhar V; Anita S; Tummala M; Raj TB; Badami V; Kumar P; Soujanya E J Clin Diagn Res; 2014 Dec; 8(12):ZC70-2. PubMed ID: 25654036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of Radicular Dentin Microcracks Formation after Instrumentation with NiTi Hand and Rotary File System: A Stereomicroscopic Study. Kumar A; Kaul S; Kuriakose F; James J; Joy B; Malik R J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Nov; 21(11):1233-1237. PubMed ID: 33850068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The incidence of root microcracks caused by 3 different single-file systems versus the ProTaper system. Liu R; Hou BX; Wesselink PR; Wu MK; Shemesh H J Endod; 2013 Aug; 39(8):1054-6. PubMed ID: 23880276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative Analysis of Dentinal Crack Formation Following Root Canal Instrumentation with Hand K-Flex Files, ProTaper Next, and Self-adjusting Files. Jacob J; Paul M; Sara B; Steaphen P; Philip N; Mathew J J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Aug; 20(8):935-939. PubMed ID: 31797850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative evaluation of hand and rotary file systems on dentinal microcrack formation during pulpectomy procedure in primary teeth: an in vitro study. Nisar P; Katge F; Chimata VK; Pradhan D; Patil D; Agrawal I Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2024 Apr; 25(2):181-189. PubMed ID: 38461490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper. Bürklein S; Hinschitza K; Dammaschke T; Schäfer E Int Endod J; 2012 May; 45(5):449-61. PubMed ID: 22188401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative evaluation of apical extrusion of intracanal bacteria using ProTaper Next, Mtwo, and ProTaper rotary systems: An Polineni S; Damaraju B; Bolla N; Sunil C; Krishna NV; Sreeha K J Conserv Dent; 2020; 23(3):314-318. PubMed ID: 33551607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of newly formed microcracks after instrumentation using protaper next, reciproc and self-adjusting file systems. Cakici F; Cakici EB; Sadik B; Keles A; Fundaoglu Kucukekenci F Eur Oral Res; 2019 Jan; 53(1):21-24. PubMed ID: 31309188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Computed Tomography Evaluation of Canal Transportation and Volumetric Changes in Root Canal Dentin of Curved Canals Using Mtwo, ProTaper and ProTaper Next Rotary System-An In-vitro Study. Shivashankar MB; Niranjan NT; Jayasheel A; Kenchanagoudra MG J Clin Diagn Res; 2016 Nov; 10(11):ZC10-ZC14. PubMed ID: 28050495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Incidence of apical crack initiation and propagation during the removal of root canal filling material with ProTaper and Mtwo rotary nickel-titanium retreatment instruments and hand files. Topçuoğlu HS; Düzgün S; Kesim B; Tuncay O J Endod; 2014 Jul; 40(7):1009-12. PubMed ID: 24935554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal retreatment with several NiTi systems. Dincer AN; Er O; Canakci BC Int Endod J; 2015 Dec; 48(12):1194-8. PubMed ID: 25557631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Occurrence of Dentinal Microcracks in Severely Curved Root Canals with ProTaper Universal, WaveOne, and ProTaper Next File Systems. Li SH; Lu Y; Song D; Zhou X; Zheng QH; Gao Y; Huang DM J Endod; 2015 Nov; 41(11):1875-9. PubMed ID: 26386948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Comparative Efficacy of Different Files in The Removal of Different Sealers in Simulated Root Canal Retreatment- An In-vitro Study. Kanaparthy A; Kanaparthy R J Clin Diagn Res; 2016 May; 10(5):ZC130-3. PubMed ID: 27437347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]