These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
373 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29388080)
21. Comparative analysis of biologic versus synthetic mesh outcomes in contaminated hernia repairs. Majumder A; Winder JS; Wen Y; Pauli EM; Belyansky I; Novitsky YW Surgery; 2016 Oct; 160(4):828-838. PubMed ID: 27452954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A Current Review of Biologic Meshes in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction. Nahabedian MY; Sosin M; Bhanot P Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 Sep; 142(3 Suppl):74S-81S. PubMed ID: 30138272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Single-stage abdominal wall reconstruction in contaminated and dirty wounds is safe: a single center experience. Schecter SC; Imhoff L; Lasker MV; Hornbeck S; Flores HC Surg Endosc; 2022 Aug; 36(8):5766-5771. PubMed ID: 35132452 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Bovine versus porcine acellular dermal matrix for abdominal wall herniorrhaphy or bridging. Van Orden K; Santos J; Stanfield B; Frost LS; Ruditsky A; Foster A; Brahmbhatt TS; Burke PA; Fernandez-Moure J; Haines K; Agarwal S; Kasotakis G Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg; 2022 Jun; 48(3):1993-2001. PubMed ID: 33712893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A Current Review of Synthetic Meshes in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction. Cobb WS Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 Sep; 142(3 Suppl):64S-71S. PubMed ID: 30138270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The battle between biological and synthetic meshes in ventral hernia repair. Montgomery A Hernia; 2013 Feb; 17(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 23314566 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Abdominal wall reconstruction with large polypropylene mesh: is bigger better? Nisiewicz M; Hughes T; Plymale MA; Davenport DL; Roth JS Hernia; 2019 Oct; 23(5):1003-1008. PubMed ID: 31471823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Repair of recurrent hernia after biologic mesh failure in abdominal wall reconstruction. Purnell CA; Souza JM; Park E; Dumanian GA Am J Surg; 2014 Nov; 208(5):788-793. PubMed ID: 25118163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Outcomes with porcine acellular dermal matrix versus synthetic mesh and suture in complicated open ventral hernia repair. Liang MK; Berger RL; Nguyen MT; Hicks SC; Li LT; Leong M Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2014 Oct; 15(5):506-12. PubMed ID: 25215466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Biosynthetic Resorbable Prosthesis is Useful in Single-Stage Management of Chronic Mesh Infection After Abdominal Wall Hernia Repair. Bueno-Lledó J; Ceno M; Perez-Alonso C; Martinez-Hoed J; Torregrosa-Gallud A; Pous-Serrano S World J Surg; 2021 Feb; 45(2):443-450. PubMed ID: 33025154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A 5-year clinical experience with single-staged repairs of infected and contaminated abdominal wall defects utilizing biologic mesh. Rosen MJ; Krpata DM; Ermlich B; Blatnik JA Ann Surg; 2013 Jun; 257(6):991-6. PubMed ID: 23426340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Single-staged retromuscular abdominal wall reconstruction with mesh at the time of ostomy reversal: are we crossing the line? An ACHQC Analysis. Melland-Smith M; Miller B; Petro C; Beffa L; Prabhu A; Krpata D; LaBelle M; Tamer R; Rosen M Surg Endosc; 2023 Sep; 37(9):7051-7059. PubMed ID: 37353652 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Full-thickness skin graft vs. synthetic mesh in the repair of giant incisional hernia: a randomized controlled multicenter study. Clay L; Stark B; Gunnarsson U; Strigård K Hernia; 2018 Apr; 22(2):325-332. PubMed ID: 29247365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. It all doesn't always have to go: abdominal wall reconstruction involving selective synthetic mesh explantation with biologic mesh salvage. Ober I; Stuleanu T; Ball CG; Nickerson D; Kirkpatrick AW Can J Surg; 2023; 66(1):E48-E51. PubMed ID: 36731913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Cost-Utility Analysis of Biologic and Biosynthetic Mesh in Ventral Hernia Repair: When Are They Worth It? Schneeberger S; Phillips S; Huang LC; Pierce RA; Etemad SA; Poulose BK J Am Coll Surg; 2019 Jan; 228(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 30359837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Synthetic versus Biologic Mesh in Single-Stage Repair of Complex Abdominal Wall Defects in a Contaminated Field. Chamieh J; Tan WH; Ramirez R; Nohra E; Apakama C; Symons W Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2017; 18(2):112-118. PubMed ID: 27754767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Biosynthetic meshes in contaminated fields: where are we now? A systematic review and meta-analysis in humans. Perrone G; Giuffrida M; Bonati E; Petracca GL; Catena F Hernia; 2023 Aug; 27(4):765-780. PubMed ID: 36943520 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Not all biologics are equal! Shah BC; Tiwari MM; Goede MR; Eichler MJ; Hollins RR; McBride CL; Thompson JS; Oleynikov D Hernia; 2011 Apr; 15(2):165-71. PubMed ID: 21188442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Long-term outcomes after contaminated complex abdominal wall reconstruction. de Vries FEE; Hodgkinson JD; Claessen JJM; van Ruler O; Leo CA; Maeda Y; Lapid O; Obdeijn MC; Tanis PJ; Bemelman WA; Constantinides J; Hanna GB; Warusavitarne J; Vaizey C; Boermeester MA Hernia; 2020 Jun; 24(3):459-468. PubMed ID: 32078080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Biologic mesh use practice patterns in abdominal wall reconstruction: a lack of consensus among surgeons. Harth KC; Krpata DM; Chawla A; Blatnik JA; Halaweish I; Rosen MJ Hernia; 2013 Feb; 17(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 23269402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]