These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29388087)

  • 1. Testing for medical school selection: What are prospective doctors' experiences and perceptions of the GAMSAT and what are the consequences of testing?
    Kumar K; Roberts C; Bartle E; Eley DS
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2018 Aug; 23(3):533-546. PubMed ID: 29388087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Establishing the criterion validity of the Graduate Medical School Admissions Test (GAMSAT).
    Coates H
    Med Educ; 2008 Oct; 42(10):999-1006. PubMed ID: 18823519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predicting academic outcomes in an Australian graduate entry medical programme.
    Puddey IB; Mercer A
    BMC Med Educ; 2014 Feb; 14():31. PubMed ID: 24528509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. GAMSAT: A 10-year retrospective overview, with detailed analysis of candidates' performance in 2014.
    Mercer A; Crotty B; Alldridge L; Le L; Vele V
    BMC Med Educ; 2015 Mar; 15():31. PubMed ID: 25889535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of accelerated, graduate-entry medicine courses: a comparison of profile, success, and specialty destination between graduate entrants to accelerated or standard medicine courses in UK.
    Garrud P; McManus IC
    BMC Med Educ; 2018 Nov; 18(1):250. PubMed ID: 30400933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Entry tests for graduate medical programs: is it time to re-think?
    Groves MA; Gordon J; Ryan G
    Med J Aust; 2007 Feb; 186(3):120-3. PubMed ID: 17309399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The relative predictive value of undergraduate versus graduate selection tools in two Australian medical schools.
    Mercer A; Hay M; Hodgson WC; Canny BJ; Puddey IB
    Med Teach; 2018 Nov; 40(11):1183-1190. PubMed ID: 29355058
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Removing the interview for medical school selection is associated with gender bias among enrolled students.
    Wilkinson D; Casey MG; Eley DS
    Med J Aust; 2014 Feb; 200(2):96-9. PubMed ID: 24484112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Medical school admission test: advantages for students whose parents are medical doctors?
    Simmenroth-Nayda A; Görlich Y
    BMC Med Educ; 2015 Apr; 15():81. PubMed ID: 25898946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predicting success in medical school: a longitudinal study of common Australian student selection tools.
    Sladek RM; Bond MJ; Frost LK; Prior KN
    BMC Med Educ; 2016 Jul; 16():187. PubMed ID: 27450570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A selection test for Australian graduate-entry medical schools.
    Aldous CJ; Leeder SR; Price J; Sefton AE; Teubner JK
    Med J Aust; 1997 Mar; 166(5):247-50. PubMed ID: 9076269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The relationship between school type and academic performance at medical school: a national, multi-cohort study.
    Kumwenda B; Cleland JA; Walker K; Lee AJ; Greatrix R
    BMJ Open; 2017 Aug; 7(8):e016291. PubMed ID: 28860227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The interaction of socio-economic status and gender in widening participation in medicine.
    Griffin B; Hu W
    Med Educ; 2015 Jan; 49(1):103-13. PubMed ID: 25545578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Only the best: medical student selection in Australia.
    Wilson IG; Roberts C; Flynn EM; Griffin B
    Med J Aust; 2012 Mar; 196(5):357. PubMed ID: 22432678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Same admissions tools, different outcomes: a critical perspective on predictive validity in three undergraduate medical schools.
    Edwards D; Friedman T; Pearce J
    BMC Med Educ; 2013 Dec; 13():173. PubMed ID: 24373207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Emotional intelligence in medical students: does it correlate with selection measures?
    Carr SE
    Med Educ; 2009 Nov; 43(11):1069-77. PubMed ID: 19874500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Admission to medical schools in Sri Lanka: predictive validity of selection criteria.
    de Silva NR; Pathmeswaran A; de Silva N; Edirisinghe JS; Kumarasiri PV; Parameswaran SV; Seneviratne R; Warnasuriya N; de Silva HJ
    Ceylon Med J; 2006 Mar; 51(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 16898032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relationship of academic success of medical students with motivation and pre-admission grades.
    Luqman M
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2013 Jan; 23(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 23286620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The impact of preparatory activities on medical school selection outcomes: a cross-sectional survey of applicants to the University of Adelaide Medical School in 2007.
    Laurence CO; Zajac IT; Lorimer M; Turnbull DA; Sumner KE
    BMC Med Educ; 2013 Dec; 13():159. PubMed ID: 24289521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Graduate medical education in Ireland: a profile of the first cohort of students.
    Finucane P; Arnett R; Johnson A; Waters M
    Ir J Med Sci; 2008 Mar; 177(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 18256874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.