These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29388090)

  • 1. Shaping conservative spinal services with the Spine Tango Registry.
    Morris S; Booth J
    Eur Spine J; 2018 Mar; 27(3):543-553. PubMed ID: 29388090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spine Tango registry data collection in a conservative spinal service: a feasibility study.
    Morris S; Booth J; Hegarty J
    Eur Spine J; 2016 Sep; 25(9):2984-92. PubMed ID: 27439415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Patient-reported outcome of surgical treatment for lumbar spinal epidural lipomatosis.
    Ferlic PW; Mannion AF; Jeszenszky D; Porchet F; Fekete TF; Kleinstück F; Haschtmann D
    Spine J; 2016 Nov; 16(11):1333-1341. PubMed ID: 27363757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Determination of the Oswestry Disability Index score equivalent to a "satisfactory symptom state" in patients undergoing surgery for degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine-a Spine Tango registry-based study.
    van Hooff ML; Mannion AF; Staub LP; Ostelo RW; Fairbank JC
    Spine J; 2016 Oct; 16(10):1221-1230. PubMed ID: 27343730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Development of a documentation instrument for the conservative treatment of spinal disorders in the International Spine Registry, Spine Tango.
    Kessler JT; Melloh M; Zweig T; Aghayev E; Röder C
    Eur Spine J; 2011 Mar; 20(3):369-79. PubMed ID: 20532924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Is the duration of pre-operative conservative treatment associated with the clinical outcome following surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis? A study based on the Spine Tango Registry.
    Zweig T; Enke J; Mannion AF; Sobottke R; Melloh M; Freeman BJ; Aghayev E;
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Feb; 26(2):488-500. PubMed ID: 27981454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of outcome in patients undergoing surgery for intradural spinal tumor using the multidimensional patient-rated Core Outcome Measures Index and the modified McCormick Scale.
    Bellut D; Burkhardt JK; Mannion AF; Porchet F
    Neurosurg Focus; 2015 Aug; 39(2):E2. PubMed ID: 26235018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) is a responsive instrument for assessing the outcome of treatment for adult spinal deformity.
    Mannion AF; Vila-Casademunt A; Domingo-Sàbat M; Wunderlin S; Pellisé F; Bago J; Acaroglu E; Alanay A; Pérez-Grueso FS; Obeid I; Kleinstück FS;
    Eur Spine J; 2016 Aug; 25(8):2638-48. PubMed ID: 26519374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. What level of pain are patients happy to live with after surgery for lumbar degenerative disorders?
    Fekete TF; Haschtmann D; Kleinstück FS; Porchet F; Jeszenszky D; Mannion AF
    Spine J; 2016 Apr; 16(4 Suppl):S12-8. PubMed ID: 26850172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A novel use of the Spine Tango registry to evaluate selection bias in patient recruitment into clinical studies: an analysis of patients participating in the Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Outcome Study (LSOS).
    Becker HJ; Nauer S; Porchet F; Kleinstück FS; Haschtmann D; Fekete TF; Steurer J; Mannion AF
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Feb; 26(2):441-449. PubMed ID: 27844227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development of a mapping function ("crosswalk") for the conversion of scores between the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI).
    Mannion AF; Elfering A; Fekete TF; Pizones J; Pellise F; Pearson AM; Lurie JD; Porchet F; Aghayev E; Vila-Casademunt A; Mariaux F; Richner-Wunderlin S; Kleinstück FS; Loibl M; Pérez-Grueso FS; Obeid I; Alanay A; Vengust R; Jeszenszky D; Haschtmann D
    Eur Spine J; 2022 Dec; 31(12):3337-3346. PubMed ID: 36329252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Determining the quality and effectiveness of surgical spine care: patient satisfaction is not a valid proxy.
    Godil SS; Parker SL; Zuckerman SL; Mendenhall SK; Devin CJ; Asher AL; McGirt MJ
    Spine J; 2013 Sep; 13(9):1006-12. PubMed ID: 23685216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Does loss to follow-up lead to an overestimation of treatment success? Findings from a spine surgery registry of over 15,000 patients.
    Mannion AF; Fekete TF; O'Riordan D; Loibl M; Kleinstück FS; Porchet F; Reitmeir R; Jeszenszky D; Haschtmann D
    Eur Spine J; 2023 Mar; 32(3):813-823. PubMed ID: 36709245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The use of electronic PROMs provides same outcomes as paper version in a spine surgery registry. Results from a prospective cohort study.
    Langella F; Barletta P; Baroncini A; Agarossi M; Scaramuzzo L; Luca A; Bassani R; Peretti GM; Lamartina C; Villafañe JH; Berjano P
    Eur Spine J; 2021 Sep; 30(9):2645-2653. PubMed ID: 33970326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validity of the Japanese core outcome measures index (COMI)-neck for cervical spine surgery: a prospective cohort study.
    Oshima Y; Nagata K; Nakamoto H; Sakamoto R; Takeshita Y; Ohtomo N; Kawamura N; Iizuka M; Ono T; Nakajima K; Higashikawa A; Yoshimoto T; Fujii T; Tanaka S; Oka H; Matsudaira K
    Eur Spine J; 2021 Feb; 30(2):402-409. PubMed ID: 33211189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Building an electronic health record integrated quality of life outcomes registry for spine surgery.
    Azad TD; Kalani M; Wolf T; Kearney A; Lee Y; Flannery L; Chen D; Berroya R; Eisenberg M; Park J; Shuer L; Kerr A; Ratliff JK
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Jan; 24(1):176-85. PubMed ID: 26431073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Patient-reported outcomes 3 months after spine surgery: is it an accurate predictor of 12-month outcome in real-world registry platforms?
    Parker SL; Asher AL; Godil SS; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
    Neurosurg Focus; 2015 Dec; 39(6):E17. PubMed ID: 26621415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ratings of global outcome at the first post-operative assessment after spinal surgery: how often do the surgeon and patient agree?
    Lattig F; Grob D; Kleinstueck FS; Porchet F; Jeszenszky D; Bartanusz V; O'Riordan D; Mannion AF
    Eur Spine J; 2009 Aug; 18 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):386-94. PubMed ID: 19462185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of spine surgery outcomes: inconsistency of change amongst outcome measurements.
    Copay AG; Martin MM; Subach BR; Carreon LY; Glassman SD; Schuler TC; Berven S
    Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):291-6. PubMed ID: 20171937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Could less be more when assessing patient-rated outcome in spinal stenosis?
    Mannion AF; Fekete TF; Wertli MM; Mattle M; Nauer S; Kleinstück FS; Jeszenszky D; Haschtmann D; Becker HJ; Porchet F;
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 May; 40(10):710-8. PubMed ID: 25955088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.