198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 293883)
1. Pulpotomy of primary molars with coronal or total pulpitis using formocresol technique.
Mejàre I
Scand J Dent Res; 1979 Jun; 87(3):208-16. PubMed ID: 293883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical and radiographic comparison of primary molars after formocresol and electrosurgical pulpotomy: a randomized clinical trial.
Bahrololoomi Z; Moeintaghavi A; Emtiazi M; Hosseini G
Indian J Dent Res; 2008; 19(3):219-23. PubMed ID: 18797098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mineral trioxide aggregate vs. formocresol in pulpotomized primary molars: a preliminary report.
Eidelman E; Holan G; Fuks AB
Pediatr Dent; 2001; 23(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 11242724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biodentine
El Meligy OAES; Alamoudi NM; Allazzam SM; El-Housseiny AAM
BMC Oral Health; 2019 Jan; 19(1):3. PubMed ID: 30612569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Outcome of formocresol/ZOE sub-base pulpotomies utilizing alternative radiographic success criteria.
Strange DM; Seale NS; Nunn ME; Strange M
Pediatr Dent; 2001; 23(4):331-6. PubMed ID: 11572492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ferric sulphate and formocresol in pulpotomy of primary molars: long term follow-up study.
Ibricevic H; Al-Jame Q
Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2003 Mar; 4(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 12870985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A randomized study of sodium hypochlorite versus formocresol pulpotomy in primary molar teeth.
Ruby JD; Cox CF; Mitchell SC; Makhija S; Chompu-Inwai P; Jackson J
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2013 Mar; 23(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 22502601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Formocresol, Mineral Trioxide Aggregate, Portland Cement, and Enamel Matrix Derivative in Primary Teeth Pulpotomies: A Two Year Follow-Up.
Yildirim C; Basak F; Akgun OM; Polat GG; Altun C
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 40(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 26696101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evidence-based assessment: evaluation of the formocresol versus ferric sulfate primary molar pulpotomy.
Loh A; O'Hoy P; Tran X; Charles R; Hughes A; Kubo K; Messer LB
Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(5):401-9. PubMed ID: 15460294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of electrosurgical and formocresol pulpotomy procedures in children.
Dean JA; Mack RB; Fulkerson BT; Sanders BJ
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2002 May; 12(3):177-82. PubMed ID: 12028309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of pulpotomies in primary molars with formocresol, glutaraldehyde and ferric sulphate.
Havale R; Anegundi RT; Indushekar K; Sudha P
Oral Health Dent Manag; 2013 Mar; 12(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 23474578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Formocresol and Chloramphenicol, Tetracycline and Zinc Oxide-Eugenol Antibiotic Paste in Primary Teeth Pulpotomies: 24 month follow up.
Luengo-Fereira J; Ayala-Jiménez S; Carlos-Medrano LE; Toscano-García I; Anaya-Álvarez M
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2019; 43(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 30289365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical and radiographic comparison of biodentine, mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol as pulpotomy agents in primary molars.
Juneja P; Kulkarni S
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2017 Aug; 18(4):271-278. PubMed ID: 28780718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Therapeutic pulpotomies in primary molars with the formocresol technique. A clinical and histological follow-up.
Magnusson BO
Acta Odontol Scand; 1978; 36(3):157-65. PubMed ID: 277052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sodium hypochlorite versus Formocresol in primary molars pulpotomies: a randomized clinical trial.
Al-Mutairi MA; Bawazir OA
Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2013 Mar; 14(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 23597217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol as pulp medicaments for pulpotomies in primary molars.
Noorollahian H
Br Dent J; 2008 Jun; 204(11):E20. PubMed ID: 18425074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative evaluation of formocresol and mineral trioxide aggregate as pulpotomy agents in deciduous teeth.
Srinivasan D; Jayanthi M
Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(3):385-90. PubMed ID: 22048576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Current concepts in vital pulpotomies in primary teeth.
Castro A
J Mich Dent Assoc; 2005 Jan; 87(1):26-8. PubMed ID: 15714830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol pulpotomy on vital primary teeth: a clinical and radiographic study.
Olatosi OO; Sote EO; Orenuga OO
Niger J Clin Pract; 2015; 18(2):292-6. PubMed ID: 25666010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of a novel alternative to conventional formocresol-zinc oxide eugenol pulpotomy for the treatment of pulpally involved human primary teeth: diode laser-mineral trioxide aggregate pulpotomy.
Saltzman B; Sigal M; Clokie C; Rukavina J; Titley K; Kulkarni GV
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2005 Nov; 15(6):437-47. PubMed ID: 16238654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
