These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29388970)
1. Take peer pressure out of peer review. Derrick G Nature; 2018 Feb; 554(7690):7. PubMed ID: 29388970 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Peer review: Troubled from the start. Csiszar A Nature; 2016 Apr; 532(7599):306-8. PubMed ID: 27111616 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Nature journal's plan to fast track paper for a fee prompts resignation from editorial board. Hawkes N BMJ; 2015 Mar; 350():h1761. PubMed ID: 25829179 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Row erupts over university's use of research metrics in job-cut decisions. Else H Nature; 2021 Apr; 592(7852):19. PubMed ID: 33767466 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Quality and peer review of research: an adjudicating role for editors. Newton DP Account Res; 2010 May; 17(3):130-45. PubMed ID: 20461569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Continuing the evidence-based health care debate in 2006. The progress and price of EBM. Miles A; Loughlin M J Eval Clin Pract; 2006 Aug; 12(4):385-98. PubMed ID: 16907679 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Ensuring the Quality, Fairness, and Integrity of Journal Peer Review: A Possible Role of Editors. Resnik DB; Elmore SA Sci Eng Ethics; 2016 Feb; 22(1):169-88. PubMed ID: 25633924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. UK science will be judged on impact. Gilbert N Nature; 2010 Nov; 468(7322):357. PubMed ID: 21085146 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]