357 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29388971)
1. Gender bias goes away when grant reviewers focus on the science.
Guglielmi G
Nature; 2018 Feb; 554(7690):14-15. PubMed ID: 29388971
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Racial bias continues to haunt NIH grants.
Check Hayden E
Nature; 2015 Nov; 527(7578):286-7. PubMed ID: 26581270
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. NIH to probe racial disparity in grant awards.
Reardon S
Nature; 2014 Aug; 512(7514):243. PubMed ID: 25143096
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. NIH responds to critics on peer review.
Wadman M
Nature; 2008 Jun; 453(7197):835. PubMed ID: 18548033
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Research for all.
Nature; 2015 Nov; 527(7578):275. PubMed ID: 26581254
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. NIH: grants revamp needs grounding in evidence.
Hannun YA
Nature; 2008 Apr; 452(7189):811. PubMed ID: 18421328
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Research grants: Conform and be funded.
Nicholson JM; Ioannidis JP
Nature; 2012 Dec; 492(7427):34-6. PubMed ID: 23222591
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Interviews: Big ideas for better science.
Powell K
Nature; 2015 Dec; 528(7583):589-90. PubMed ID: 26709403
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Science policy: Well-funded investigators should receive extra scrutiny.
Berg JM
Nature; 2012 Sep; 489(7415):203. PubMed ID: 22972279
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Go beyond bias training.
Mendoza-Denton R; Patt C; Richards M
Nature; 2018 May; 557(7705):299-301. PubMed ID: 29769689
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Extra scrutiny for 'grandee grantees'.
Hand E
Nature; 2012 Feb; 482(7386):450-1. PubMed ID: 22358805
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Shorter NIH grant form launches.
Wadman M
Nature; 2010 Jan; 463(7277):12-3. PubMed ID: 20054365
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Peer review reviewed.
Nature; 2007 Sep; 449(7159):115. PubMed ID: 17851475
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Who would you share your funding with?
Bollen J
Nature; 2018 Aug; 560(7717):143. PubMed ID: 30089925
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Close the gender gap in Chinese science.
Ma Y; Zhao Y; Gong X; Sun L; Zheng Y
Nature; 2018 May; 557(7703):25-27. PubMed ID: 29720637
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Science and sexism: In the eye of the Twitterstorm.
Morello L
Nature; 2015 Nov; 527(7577):148-51. PubMed ID: 26560281
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Revamp for NIH grants.
Wadman M
Nature; 2008 Feb; 451(7182):1035. PubMed ID: 18305502
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Race- and gender-based bias persists in US science.
Nature; 2018 Feb; 554(7693):561. PubMed ID: 29469104
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. NIH: Drop re-review for big grant holders.
Roy HK
Nature; 2012 Oct; 490(7419):176. PubMed ID: 23060177
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. An unhealthy obsession.
Nature; 2012 Dec; 492(7427):7. PubMed ID: 23236611
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
