These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

358 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29388971)

  • 21. UK funding ban sparks protests.
    Van Noorden R
    Nature; 2009 Mar; 458(7237):391. PubMed ID: 19325593
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Inequality quantified: Mind the gender gap.
    Shen H
    Nature; 2013 Mar; 495(7439):22-4. PubMed ID: 23467149
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The young and the restless.
    Dolgin E
    Nature; 2017 Nov; 551(7678):S15-S18. PubMed ID: 29091602
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The quest for postdoctoral independence.
    Woolston C
    Nature; 2018 Sep; 561(7724):569-571. PubMed ID: 30258145
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Supporting the future.
    Nature; 2008 Jun; 453(7198):958. PubMed ID: 18563096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. NIH plans grant-review overhaul to reduce bias.
    Kozlov M
    Nature; 2022 Dec; 612(7941):602-603. PubMed ID: 36494447
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Research funding: Making the cut.
    Powell K
    Nature; 2010 Sep; 467(7314):383-5. PubMed ID: 20864969
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Fund ideas, not pedigree, to find fresh insight.
    Sinkjær T
    Nature; 2018 Mar; 555(7695):143. PubMed ID: 29517033
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. NIH funding: The critics respond.
    Ioannidis JP; Nicholson JM
    Nature; 2013 Jan; 493(7430):26. PubMed ID: 23282353
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. NIH funding: It does support innovators.
    Salzberg SL
    Nature; 2013 Jan; 493(7430):26. PubMed ID: 23282352
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Science funding: Duel to the death.
    Bhattacharya A
    Nature; 2012 Aug; 488(7409):20-2. PubMed ID: 22859184
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. NIH funding: Agency rebuts critique.
    Santangelo G; Lipman DJ
    Nature; 2013 Jan; 493(7430):26. PubMed ID: 23282354
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. NIH funding: Thousand-citation papers are outliers.
    Woodgett J
    Nature; 2012 Dec; 492(7429):356. PubMed ID: 23257869
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The time tax put on scientists of colour.
    Gewin V
    Nature; 2020 Jul; 583(7816):479-481. PubMed ID: 32647354
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Little race or gender bias in an experiment of initial review of NIH R01 grant proposals.
    Forscher PS; Cox WTL; Brauer M; Devine PG
    Nat Hum Behav; 2019 Mar; 3(3):257-264. PubMed ID: 30953009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. 'A lot of room for bias': UK funder's data point to uneven playing field.
    Woolston C
    Nature; 2021 Mar; 591(7851):683-684. PubMed ID: 33707694
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Making an impact.
    Wu R
    Nature; 2004 Mar; 428(6979):206-7. PubMed ID: 15014507
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Sex as a Biological Variable: Now What?!
    Miller VM; Reckelhoff JF
    Physiology (Bethesda); 2016 Mar; 31(2):78-80. PubMed ID: 26865575
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. NIH firm on grant application rules.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 2011 Mar; 471(7340):558. PubMed ID: 21455147
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Peer reviewers need more nurturing.
    Catlow R
    Nature; 2017 Dec; 552(7685):293. PubMed ID: 29293240
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.