These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29389215)

  • 1. Deep neural networks are more accurate than humans at detecting sexual orientation from facial images.
    Wang Y; Kosinski M
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2018 Feb; 114(2):246-257. PubMed ID: 29389215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Presentation in self-posted facial images can expose sexual orientation: Implications for research and privacy.
    Wang D
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2022 May; 122(5):806-824. PubMed ID: 35404640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Facial Structure Predicts Sexual Orientation in Both Men and Women.
    Skorska MN; Geniole SN; Vrysen BM; McCormick CM; Bogaert AF
    Arch Sex Behav; 2015 Jul; 44(5):1377-94. PubMed ID: 25550146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Shape differences between the faces of homosexual and heterosexual men.
    Valentova JV; Kleisner K; Havlíček J; Neustupa J
    Arch Sex Behav; 2014 Feb; 43(2):353-61. PubMed ID: 24132775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Gender identity rather than sexual orientation impacts on facial preferences.
    Ciocca G; Limoncin E; Cellerino A; Fisher AD; Gravina GL; Carosa E; Mollaioli D; Valenzano DR; Mennucci A; Bandini E; Di Stasi SM; Maggi M; Lenzi A; Jannini EA
    J Sex Med; 2014 Oct; 11(10):2500-7. PubMed ID: 25066178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Inferences About Sexual Orientation: The Roles of Stereotypes, Faces, and The Gaydar Myth.
    Cox WT; Devine PG; Bischmann AA; Hyde JS
    J Sex Res; 2016; 53(2):157-71. PubMed ID: 26219212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sexual orientation perception involves gendered facial cues.
    Freeman JB; Johnson KL; Ambady N; Rule NO
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2010 Oct; 36(10):1318-31. PubMed ID: 20682754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. EAC-Net: Deep Nets with Enhancing and Cropping for Facial Action Unit Detection.
    Li W; Abtahi F; Zhu Z; Yin L
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2018 Nov; 40(11):2583-2596. PubMed ID: 29994168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Straight until proven gay: A systematic bias toward straight categorizations in sexual orientation judgments.
    Lick DJ; Johnson KL
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2016 Jun; 110(6):801-17. PubMed ID: 27281352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Facial recognition technology and human raters can predict political orientation from images of expressionless faces even when controlling for demographics and self-presentation.
    Kosinski M; Khambatta P; Wang Y
    Am Psychol; 2024 Oct; 79(7):942-955. PubMed ID: 38512164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perception of Sexual Orientation from Facial Structure: A Study with Artificial Face Models.
    González-Álvarez J
    Arch Sex Behav; 2017 Jul; 46(5):1251-1260. PubMed ID: 28155008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sexually Explicit Media Use by Sexual Identity: A Comparative Analysis of Gay, Bisexual, and Heterosexual Men in the United States.
    Downing MJ; Schrimshaw EW; Scheinmann R; Antebi-Gruszka N; Hirshfield S
    Arch Sex Behav; 2017 Aug; 46(6):1763-1776. PubMed ID: 27709363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mostly heterosexual and mostly gay/lesbian: evidence for new sexual orientation identities.
    Vrangalova Z; Savin-Williams RC
    Arch Sex Behav; 2012 Feb; 41(1):85-101. PubMed ID: 22327566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Swagger, sway, and sexuality: Judging sexual orientation from body motion and morphology.
    Johnson KL; Gill S; Reichman V; Tassinary LG
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2007 Sep; 93(3):321-34. PubMed ID: 17723051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Lateralization for Processing Facial Emotions in Gay Men, Heterosexual Men, and Heterosexual Women.
    Rahman Q; Yusuf S
    Arch Sex Behav; 2015 Jul; 44(5):1405-13. PubMed ID: 25564038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Gender Differences in Sexual Attraction and Moral Judgment: Research With Artificial Face Models.
    González-Álvarez J; Cervera-Crespo T
    Psychol Rep; 2019 Apr; 122(2):525-535. PubMed ID: 29388505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Face perception is modulated by sexual preference.
    Kranz F; Ishai A
    Curr Biol; 2006 Jan; 16(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 16401423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Facial structure and perception of sexual orientation: Research with face models based on photographs of real people.
    González-Alvarez J; Sos-Peña R
    Int J Psychol; 2022 Apr; 57(2):279-288. PubMed ID: 34562272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detection of sexual orientation ("gaydar") by homosexual and heterosexual women.
    Lyons M; Lynch A; Brewer G; Bruno D
    Arch Sex Behav; 2014 Feb; 43(2):345-52. PubMed ID: 23813041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Beyond categories: Perceiving sexual attraction from faces.
    Bjornsdottir RT; Cheso D; Rule NO
    Br J Psychol; 2022 Feb; 113(1):226-247. PubMed ID: 34296765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.