These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

515 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29389770)

  • 41. Novel placement of cortical bone trajectory screws in previously instrumented pedicles for adjacent-segment lumbar disease using CT image-guided navigation.
    Rodriguez A; Neal MT; Liu A; Somasundaram A; Hsu W; Branch CL
    Neurosurg Focus; 2014 Mar; 36(3):E9. PubMed ID: 24580010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Safety and Efficacy of Reconstruction of Complex Cervical Spine Pathology Using Pedicle Screws Inserted with Stealth Navigation and 3D Image-Guided (O-Arm) Technology.
    Theologis AA; Burch S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Sep; 40(18):1397-406. PubMed ID: 26426710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Accuracy of pedicle screw placement using neuronavigation based on intraoperative 3D rotational fluoroscopy in the thoracic and lumbar spine.
    Conrads N; Grunz JP; Huflage H; Luetkens KS; Feldle P; Grunz K; Köhler S; Westermaier T
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2023 Jun; 143(6):3007-3013. PubMed ID: 35794344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The accuracy of navigation and 3D image-guided placement for the placement of pedicle screws in congenital spine deformity.
    Larson AN; Polly DW; Guidera KJ; Mielke CH; Santos ER; Ledonio CG; Sembrano JN
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2012 Sep; 32(6):e23-9. PubMed ID: 22892631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Three-dimensional image-guided placement of S2 alar screws to adjunct or salvage lumbosacral fixation.
    Nottmeier EW; Pirris SM; Balseiro S; Fenton D
    Spine J; 2010 Jul; 10(7):595-601. PubMed ID: 20434406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Risk-benefit analysis of navigation techniques for vertebral transpedicular instrumentation: a prospective study.
    Noriega DC; Hernández-Ramajo R; Rodríguez-Monsalve Milano F; Sanchez-Lite I; Toribio B; Ardura F; Torres R; Corredera R; Kruger A
    Spine J; 2017 Jan; 17(1):70-75. PubMed ID: 27503262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Intraoperative CT-guided navigation versus fluoroscopy for percutaneous pedicle screw placement in 192 patients: a comparative analysis.
    La Rocca G; Mazzucchi E; Pignotti F; Nasto LA; Galieri G; Olivi A; De Santis V; Rinaldi P; Pola E; Sabatino G
    J Orthop Traumatol; 2022 Sep; 23(1):44. PubMed ID: 36048284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Spinal intraoperative three-dimensional navigation: correlation between clinical and absolute engineering accuracy.
    Guha D; Jakubovic R; Gupta S; Alotaibi NM; Cadotte D; da Costa LB; George R; Heyn C; Howard P; Kapadia A; Klostranec JM; Phan N; Tan G; Mainprize TG; Yee A; Yang VX
    Spine J; 2017 Apr; 17(4):489-498. PubMed ID: 27777052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Does the accuracy of pedicle screw placement differ between the attending surgeon and resident in navigated robotic-assisted minimally invasive spine surgery?
    Vardiman AB; Wallace DJ; Booher GA; Crawford NR; Riggleman JR; Greeley SL; Ledonio CG
    J Robot Surg; 2020 Aug; 14(4):567-572. PubMed ID: 31542860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. How safe is minimally invasive pedicle screw placement for treatment of thoracolumbar spine fractures?
    Heintel TM; Dannigkeit S; Fenwick A; Jordan MC; Jansen H; Gilbert F; Meffert R
    Eur Spine J; 2017 May; 26(5):1515-1524. PubMed ID: 27933475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Use of Intraoperative Computed Tomography Improves Outcome of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.
    Venier A; Croci D; Robert T; Distefano D; Presilla S; Scarone P
    World Neurosurg; 2021 Apr; 148():e572-e580. PubMed ID: 33482416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Comparison of Radiation Exposure Between O-Arm Navigated and C-Arm Guided Screw Placement in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Chang CC; Chang HK; Wu JC; Tu TH; Cheng H; Huang WC
    World Neurosurg; 2020 Jul; 139():e489-e495. PubMed ID: 32311567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Comparison of open and percutaneous lumbar pedicle screw revision rate using 3-D image guidance and intraoperative CT.
    Santos ER; Sembrano JN; Yson SC; Polly DW
    Orthopedics; 2015 Feb; 38(2):e129-34. PubMed ID: 25665118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Minimally Invasive, Stereotactic, Wireless, Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement in the Lumbar Spine: Accuracy Rates With 182 Consecutive Screws.
    Sadrameli SS; Jafrani R; Staub BN; Radaideh M; Holman PJ
    Int J Spine Surg; 2018 Dec; 12(6):650-658. PubMed ID: 30619667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Pedicle Screw Placement Using Intraoperative Computed Tomography and Computer-Aided Spinal Navigation Improves Screw Accuracy and Avoids Postoperative Revisions: Single-Center Analysis of 1400 Pedicle Screws.
    Hagan MJ; Syed S; Leary OP; Persad-Paisley EM; Lin Y; Zheng B; Shao B; Abdulrazeq H; Yu JYH; Telfeian AE; Gokaslan ZL; Fridley JS; Oyelese AA
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Apr; 160():e169-e179. PubMed ID: 34990843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [Posterior lumbar fusion using the O-arm surgical imaging system: initial experience].
    Castro Castro J; Rodino Padín J; Pinzón Millán A; Agulleiro Díaz JP; Villa Fernández JM; Pastor Zapata A
    Neurocirugia (Astur); 2013; 24(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 23246338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. First Clinical Experience with a Novel 3D C-Arm-Based System for Navigated Percutaneous Thoracolumbar Pedicle Screw Placement.
    Mandelka E; Gierse J; Gruetzner PA; Franke J; Vetter SY
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2022 Aug; 58(8):. PubMed ID: 36013578
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Comparison of navigated versus non-navigated pedicle screw placement in 260 patients and 1434 screws: screw accuracy, screw size, and the complexity of surgery.
    Luther N; Iorgulescu JB; Geannette C; Gebhard H; Saleh T; Tsiouris AJ; Härtl R
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2015 Jun; 28(5):E298-303. PubMed ID: 23511642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Intraoperative cone beam-computed tomography with navigation (O-ARM) versus conventional fluoroscopy (C-ARM): a cadaveric study comparing accuracy, efficiency, and safety for spinal instrumentation.
    Tabaraee E; Gibson AG; Karahalios DG; Potts EA; Mobasser JP; Burch S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Oct; 38(22):1953-8. PubMed ID: 23883830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Robot-assisted percutaneous pedicle screw placement accuracy compared with alternative guidance in lateral single-position surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Patel NA; Kuo CC; Pennington Z; Brown NJ; Gendreau J; Singh R; Shahrestani S; Boyett C; Diaz-Aguilar LD; Pham MH
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2023 Oct; 39(4):443-451. PubMed ID: 37382304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.