345 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29390228)
1. Multiple Angulated Mammography Reconstructions in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for the Diagnosis of Microcalcifications - Added Value to Standard Stack Reconstructions and Synthesized Mammography.
Neubauer J; Neubauer C; Wicklein J; Mertelmeier T; Windfuhr-Blum M; Langer M
Rofo; 2018 May; 190(5):433-440. PubMed ID: 29390228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Follow-up of B3 breast lesions without residual microcalcifications post vacuum-assisted biopsy, can contrast-enhanced digital mammography help?
Bicchierai G; Nori J; De Benedetto D; Boeri C; Vanzi E; Bianchi S; Kaur Gill M; Cirone D; Miele V
Breast J; 2020 Feb; 26(2):299-302. PubMed ID: 31486197
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis with a wide scan angle compared to full-field digital mammography for the detection and characterization of microcalcifications.
Clauser P; Nagl G; Helbich TH; Pinker-Domenig K; Weber M; Kapetas P; Bernathova M; Baltzer PAT
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Dec; 85(12):2161-2168. PubMed ID: 27842661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis and magnetic resonance imaging added to digital mammography in women with known breast cancers.
Kim WH; Chang JM; Moon HG; Yi A; Koo HR; Gweon HM; Moon WK
Eur Radiol; 2016 Jun; 26(6):1556-64. PubMed ID: 26376882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Tomosynthesis-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: A feasibility study.
Waldherr C; Berclaz G; Altermatt HJ; Cerny P; Keller P; Dietz U; Buser K; Ciriolo M; Sonnenschein MJ
Eur Radiol; 2016 Jun; 26(6):1582-9. PubMed ID: 26385802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Microcalcifications Detected at Screening Mammography: Synthetic Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis versus Digital Mammography.
Lai YC; Ray KM; Lee AY; Hayward JH; Freimanis RI; Lobach IV; Joe BN
Radiology; 2018 Dec; 289(3):630-638. PubMed ID: 30277445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of synthetic mammography, reconstructed from digital breast tomosynthesis, and digital mammography: evaluation of lesion conspicuity and BI-RADS assessment categories.
Mariscotti G; Durando M; Houssami N; Fasciano M; Tagliafico A; Bosco D; Casella C; Bogetti C; Bergamasco L; Fonio P; Gandini G
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Dec; 166(3):765-773. PubMed ID: 28819781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. 3-T breast magnetic resonance imaging in patients with suspicious microcalcifications on mammography.
Stehouwer BL; Merckel LG; Verkooijen HM; Peters NH; Mann RM; Duvivier KM; Mali WP; Peeters PH; Veldhuis WB; van den Bosch MA
Eur Radiol; 2014 Mar; 24(3):603-9. PubMed ID: 24078055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Performance of 2D Synthetic Mammography Versus Digital Mammography in the Detection of Microcalcifications at Screening.
Dodelzon K; Simon K; Dou E; Levy AD; Michaels AY; Askin G; Katzen JT
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Jun; 214(6):1436-1444. PubMed ID: 32255687
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of the extent of microcalcifications to predict the size of a ductal carcinoma in situ: comparison between tomosynthesis and conventional mammography.
Berger N; Schwizer SD; Varga Z; Rageth C; Frauenfelder T; Boss A
Clin Imaging; 2016; 40(6):1269-1273. PubMed ID: 27677056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of synthetic and digital mammography with digital breast tomosynthesis or alone for the detection and classification of microcalcifications.
Choi JS; Han BK; Ko EY; Kim GR; Ko ES; Park KW
Eur Radiol; 2019 Jan; 29(1):319-329. PubMed ID: 29931560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Evaluation of the primary diagnosis with a CAD-system in mammography].
Malich A; Vogel D; Facius M; Marx C; Freesmeyer MG; Sauner D; Hansch A; Pfleiderer SO; Fleck M; Kaiser WA
Rofo; 2003 Sep; 175(9):1225-31. PubMed ID: 12964078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Detection and classification of calcifications on digital breast tomosynthesis and 2D digital mammography: a comparison.
Spangler ML; Zuley ML; Sumkin JH; Abrams G; Ganott MA; Hakim C; Perrin R; Chough DM; Shah R; Gur D
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Feb; 196(2):320-4. PubMed ID: 21257882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Automated breast ultrasound: lesion detection and BI-RADS classification--a pilot study.
Wenkel E; Heckmann M; Heinrich M; Schwab SA; Uder M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz WA; Janka R
Rofo; 2008 Sep; 180(9):804-8. PubMed ID: 18704878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of diagnostic performances in the evaluation of breast microcalcifications: synthetic mammography versus full-field digital mammography.
Kilic P; Sendur HN; Gultekin S; Gultekin II; Cindil E; Cerit M
Ir J Med Sci; 2022 Aug; 191(4):1891-1897. PubMed ID: 34472041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of breast cancer detection and depiction between planar and rotating synthetic mammography generated from breast tomosynthesis.
Rodriguez-Ruiz A; Lardenoije S; Wanders AJT; Sechopoulos I; Mann RM
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Nov; 108():78-83. PubMed ID: 30396675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Breast calcifications: the focal group.
Demetri-Lewis A; Slanetz PJ; Eisenberg RL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Apr; 198(4):W325-43. PubMed ID: 22451569
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of two-dimensional synthesized mammograms versus original digital mammograms alone and in combination with tomosynthesis images.
Zuley ML; Guo B; Catullo VJ; Chough DM; Kelly AE; Lu AH; Rathfon GY; Lee Spangler M; Sumkin JH; Wallace LP; Bandos AI
Radiology; 2014 Jun; 271(3):664-71. PubMed ID: 24475859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Digital Mammography versus Digital Mammography Plus Tomosynthesis in Breast Cancer Screening: The Oslo Tomosynthesis Screening Trial.
Skaane P; Bandos AI; Niklason LT; Sebuødegård S; Østerås BH; Gullien R; Gur D; Hofvind S
Radiology; 2019 Apr; 291(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 30777808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Morphometry by analysis of microcalcifications and histopathological diagnosis: a new approach to the diagnosis of impalpable lesions of the breast detected by mammography].
Charpin C; Garcia S
Bull Acad Natl Med; 1995 Oct; 179(7):1517-31; discussion 1532-7. PubMed ID: 8556425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
