These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29390746)

  • 61. The Influence of Noise Reduction on Speech Intelligibility, Response Times to Speech, and Perceived Listening Effort in Normal-Hearing Listeners.
    van den Tillaart-Haverkate M; de Ronde-Brons I; Dreschler WA; Houben R
    Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517716844. PubMed ID: 28656807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. A new delayless sub-band filtering method for cancelling the effect of feedback path in hearing aid systems.
    Khoubrouy SA; Panahi IM; Milani AA
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2011; 2011():7920-3. PubMed ID: 22256177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Loudness summation of equal loud narrowband signals in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Ewert SD; Oetting D
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S71-S80. PubMed ID: 28971746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Amplification of transcutaneous and percutaneous bone-conduction devices with a test-band in an induced model of conductive hearing loss.
    Park MJ; Lee JR; Yang CJ; Yoo MH; Jin IS; Choi CH; Park HJ
    Int J Audiol; 2016 Nov; 55(11):653-7. PubMed ID: 27347717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Harmonic Frequency Lowering: Effects on the Perception of Music Detail and Sound Quality.
    Kirchberger M; Russo FA
    Trends Hear; 2016 Feb; 20():. PubMed ID: 26834122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. The Impact of Hearing Aids on Listening Effort and Listening-Related Fatigue - Investigations in a Virtual Realistic Listening Environment.
    Blümer M; Heeren J; Mirkovic B; Latzel M; Gordon C; Crowhen D; Meis M; Wagener K; Schulte M
    Trends Hear; 2024; 28():23312165241265199. PubMed ID: 39095047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. European multi-centre study of the Nucleus Hybrid L24 cochlear implant.
    Lenarz T; James C; Cuda D; Fitzgerald O'Connor A; Frachet B; Frijns JH; Klenzner T; Laszig R; Manrique M; Marx M; Merkus P; Mylanus EA; Offeciers E; Pesch J; Ramos-Macias A; Robier A; Sterkers O; Uziel A
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Dec; 52(12):838-48. PubMed ID: 23992489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Benefit from non-linear frequency compression hearing aids in a clinical setting: the effects of duration of experience and severity of high-frequency hearing loss.
    Hopkins K; Khanom M; Dickinson AM; Munro KJ
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Apr; 53(4):219-28. PubMed ID: 24617592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. An algorithm that administers adaptive speech-in-noise testing to a specified reliability at selectable points on the psychometric function.
    Keidser G; Dillon H; Mejia J; Nguyen CV
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Nov; 52(11):795-800. PubMed ID: 23957444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Improvements in intelligibility of noisy reverberant speech using a binaural subband adaptive noise-cancellation processing scheme.
    Shields PW; Campbell DR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Dec; 110(6):3232-42. PubMed ID: 11785824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Feedback reduction system influence on additional gain before feedback and maximum stable gain in open-fitted hearing aids.
    Marcrum SC; Picou EM; Bohr C; Steffens T
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Oct; 57(10):737-745. PubMed ID: 30394158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Effects of interferer facing orientation on speech perception by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Strelcyk O; Pentony S; Kalluri S; Edwards B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1419-32. PubMed ID: 24606279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Masking release for hearing-impaired listeners: The effect of increased audibility through reduction of amplitude variability.
    Desloge JG; Reed CM; Braida LD; Perez ZD; D'Aquila LA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jun; 141(6):4452. PubMed ID: 28679277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Hearing-aid users' voices: a factor that could affect directional benefit.
    Wu YH; Stangl E; Bentler RA
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Nov; 52(11):789-94. PubMed ID: 23777478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. An examination of speech reception thresholds measured in a simulated reverberant cafeteria environment.
    Best V; Keidser G; Buchholz JM; Freeston K
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54(10):682-90. PubMed ID: 25853616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Dynamic relation between working memory capacity and speech recognition in noise during the first 6 months of hearing aid use.
    Ng EH; Classon E; Larsby B; Arlinger S; Lunner T; Rudner M; Rönnberg J
    Trends Hear; 2014 Nov; 18():. PubMed ID: 25421088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Optimal gain control step sizes for bimodal stimulation.
    Spirrov D; van Dijk B; Francart T
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Mar; 57(3):184-193. PubMed ID: 29172895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Placebo effects in hearing-aid trials are reliable.
    Dawes P; Hopkins R; Munro KJ
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Jul; 52(7):472-7. PubMed ID: 23594421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Time-frequency masking for speech separation and its potential for hearing aid design.
    DeLiang Wang
    Trends Amplif; 2008 Dec; 12(4):332-53. PubMed ID: 18974204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Preliminary comparison of bone-anchored hearing instruments and a dental device as treatments for unilateral hearing loss.
    Moore BC; Popelka GR
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Oct; 52(10):678-86. PubMed ID: 23859058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.