These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29390749)

  • 21. A real-time articulatory visual feedback approach with target presentation for second language pronunciation learning.
    Suemitsu A; Dang J; Ito T; Tiede M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Oct; 138(4):EL382-7. PubMed ID: 26520348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Computer-Assisted Visual Articulation Feedback in L2 Pronunciation Instruction: A Review.
    Bliss H; Abel J; Gick B
    J Second Lang Pronunciation; 2018 Jan; 4(1):129-153. PubMed ID: 34262851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Phonetic, phonemic, and phonological factors in cross-language discrimination of phonotactic contrasts.
    Davidson L
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Feb; 37(1):270-82. PubMed ID: 21090904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Real-time Controlling Dynamics Sensing in Air Traffic System.
    Lin Y; Tan X; Yang B; Yang K; Zhang J; Yu J
    Sensors (Basel); 2019 Feb; 19(3):. PubMed ID: 30736452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Does size matter? Subsegmental cues to vowel mispronunciation detection.
    Mani N; Plunkett K
    J Child Lang; 2011 Jun; 38(3):606-27. PubMed ID: 21034524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Orthography affects second language speech: Double letters and geminate production in English.
    Bassetti B
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Nov; 43(11):1835-1842. PubMed ID: 28504532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Training the brain to weight speech cues differently: a study of Finnish second-language users of English.
    Ylinen S; Uther M; Latvala A; Vepsäläinen S; Iverson P; Akahane-Yamada R; Näätänen R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Jun; 22(6):1319-32. PubMed ID: 19445609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Typical errors in pronouncing medical English terminology made by first and second year students of medicine at the Medical School of Novi Sad University].
    Marosan Z; Marković V
    Med Pregl; 2010; 63(11-12):763-6. PubMed ID: 21553450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Lexical frequency and neighborhood density effects on the recognition of native and Spanish-accented words by native English and Spanish listeners.
    Imai S; Walley AC; Flege JE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Feb; 117(2):896-907. PubMed ID: 15759709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Learning English vowels with different first-language vowel systems II: Auditory training for native Spanish and German speakers.
    Iverson P; Evans BG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Aug; 126(2):866-77. PubMed ID: 19640051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Vowels in early words: an event-related potential study.
    Mani N; Mills DL; Plunkett K
    Dev Sci; 2012 Jan; 15(1):2-11. PubMed ID: 22251287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Phonological deficits in French speaking children with SLI.
    Maillart C; Parisse C
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2006; 41(3):253-74. PubMed ID: 16702093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Phonemic feature involvement in lexical access in grades 3 and 5: Evidence from visual and auditory lexical decision tasks.
    Sauval K; Perre L; Casalis S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Jan; 182():212-219. PubMed ID: 29258652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Perceptual development of phoneme contrasts: how sensitivity changes along acoustic dimensions that contrast phoneme categories.
    Heeren WF; Schouten ME
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Oct; 124(4):2291-302. PubMed ID: 19062867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Phonological Knowledge in Typical and Atypical Speech-Sound Development.
    Munson B; Edwards J; Beckman ME
    Top Lang Disord; 2005 Jul; 25(3):190-206. PubMed ID: 20209070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A mouse with a roof? effects of phonological neighbors on processing of words in sentences in a non-native language.
    Rüschemeyer SA; Nojack A; Limbach M
    Brain Lang; 2008 Feb; 104(2):132-44. PubMed ID: 17391746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Vowels, consonants, and lexical tones: Sensitivity to phonological variation in monolingual Mandarin and bilingual English-Mandarin toddlers.
    Wewalaarachchi TD; Wong LH; Singh L
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2017 Jul; 159():16-33. PubMed ID: 28266332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of speech-intrinsic variations on human and automatic recognition of spoken phonemes.
    Meyer BT; Brand T; Kollmeier B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jan; 129(1):388-403. PubMed ID: 21303019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of a training program using visible speech in German schools for the deaf.
    Beeker R; Artelt C
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 1998; 3(2):157-72. PubMed ID: 15579862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Intervention in dyslexic disorders: phonological awareness training].
    Etchepareborda MC
    Rev Neurol; 2003 Feb; 36 Suppl 1():S13-9. PubMed ID: 12599098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.