These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29390785)

  • 1. Distribution of spectral modulation transfer functions in a young, normal-hearing population.
    Hoover EC; Eddins AC; Eddins DA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Jan; 143(1):306. PubMed ID: 29390785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How Do Age and Hearing Loss Impact Spectral Envelope Perception?
    Ozmeral EJ; Eddins AC; Eddins DA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 Sep; 61(9):2376-2385. PubMed ID: 30178062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spectral modulation detection as a function of modulation frequency, carrier bandwidth, and carrier frequency region.
    Eddins DA; Bero EM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jan; 121(1):363-72. PubMed ID: 17297791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Spectral modulation masking patterns reveal tuning to spectral envelope frequency.
    Saoji AA; Eddins DA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Aug; 122(2):1004-13. PubMed ID: 17672648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Effects of Duration and Level on Spectral Modulation Perception.
    Isarangura S; Eddins AC; Ozmeral EJ; Eddins DA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Oct; 62(10):3876-3886. PubMed ID: 31638883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spectro-temporal modulation masking patterns reveal frequency selectivity.
    Oetjen A; Verhey JL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):714-23. PubMed ID: 25698006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of temporal asymmetry on amplitude modulation detection using pure-tone carriers (L).
    Shen Y; Lentz JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):2635-8. PubMed ID: 22087889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Temporal modulation transfer functions obtained using sinusoidal carriers with normally hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Moore BC; Glasberg BR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Aug; 110(2):1067-73. PubMed ID: 11519575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Frequency specificity of amplitude-modulation-following response detected by phase spectral analysis.
    Aoyagi M; Kiren T; Kim Y; Suzuki Y; Fuse T; Koike Y
    Audiology; 1993; 32(5):293-301. PubMed ID: 8216028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Age-related differences in the temporal modulation transfer function with pure-tone carriers.
    He NJ; Mills JH; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Dec; 124(6):3841-9. PubMed ID: 19206810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Combination of binaural and harmonic masking release effects in the detection of a single component in complex tones.
    Klein-Hennig M; Dietz M; Hohmann V
    Hear Res; 2018 Mar; 359():23-31. PubMed ID: 29310976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of speech signal content and speaker gender on acceptance of noise in listeners with normal hearing.
    Plyler PN; Alworth LN; Rossini TP; Mapes KE
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Apr; 50(4):243-8. PubMed ID: 21309641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimation of the center frequency of the highest modulation filter.
    Moore BC; Füllgrabe C; Sek A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Feb; 125(2):1075-81. PubMed ID: 19206882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Auditory steady state response in sound field.
    Hernández-Pérez H; Torres-Fortuny A
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Feb; 52(2):139-43. PubMed ID: 23176132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Human Envelope Following Responses to Amplitude Modulation: Effects of Aging and Modulation Depth.
    Dimitrijevic A; Alsamri J; John MS; Purcell D; George S; Zeng FG
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):e322-35. PubMed ID: 27556365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measurement of the binaural auditory filter using a detection task.
    Kolarik AJ; Culling JF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 May; 127(5):3009-17. PubMed ID: 21117750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of the use of personal music players on amplitude modulation detection and frequency discrimination.
    Vinay SN; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Dec; 128(6):3634-41. PubMed ID: 21218895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of transient-evoked and distortion product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects.
    Gorga MP; Neely ST; Bergman BM; Beauchaine KL; Kaminski JR; Peters J; Schulte L; Jesteadt W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Nov; 94(5):2639-48. PubMed ID: 8270740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Acoustic echoplanar scanner noise and pure tone hearing thresholds: the effects of sequence repetition times and acoustic noise rates.
    Ulmer JL; Biswal BB; Mark LP; Mathews VP; Prost RW; Millen SJ; Garman JN; Horzewski D
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1998; 22(3):480-6. PubMed ID: 9606392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Two-source interference as the major reason for auditory-threshold estimation error based on DPOAE input-output functions in normal-hearing subjects.
    Dalhoff E; Turcanu D; Vetešník A; Gummer AW
    Hear Res; 2013 Feb; 296():67-82. PubMed ID: 23268357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.