129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29390920)
1. Utility of Additional Tissue Sections in Surgical Pathology.
Hamza A; Alrajjal A; Edens J; Khawar S; Khurram MS; Szpunar S; Bonnett M
Int J Surg Pathol; 2018 Aug; 26(5):392-401. PubMed ID: 29390920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The impact of complete embedding of remaining tissue in gynecological lymph node dissection specimen in surgical pathology on lymph node yield: is it clinically relevant?
Andruszkow J; Meinhold-Heerlein I; Winkler B; Bruno B; Knüchel R; Jäkel J
Virchows Arch; 2018 Aug; 473(2):183-188. PubMed ID: 29705969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Better retrieval of lymph nodes in colorectal resection specimens by pathologists' assistants.
Kuijpers CC; van Slooten HJ; Schreurs WH; Moormann GR; Abtahi MA; Slappendel A; Cliteur V; van Diest PJ; Jiwa NM
J Clin Pathol; 2013 Jan; 66(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 23087331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Second Opinion Expert Pathology Review in Bladder Cancer: Implications for Patient Care.
Gordetsky J; Collingwood R; Lai WS; Del Carmen Rodriquez Pena M; Rais-Bahrami S
Int J Surg Pathol; 2018 Feb; 26(1):12-17. PubMed ID: 28905666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Lymph Node Yield After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Rectal Cancer Specimens: A Randomized Trial Comparing Two Fixatives.
Dias AR; Pereira MA; de Mello ES; Nahas SC; Cecconello I; Ribeiro U
Dis Colon Rectum; 2018 Aug; 61(8):888-896. PubMed ID: 29944580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of formalin and GEWF in fixation of colorectal carcinoma specimens: rates of lymph node retrieval and effect on TNM staging.
Horne J; Carr NJ; Bateman AC; Kandala N; Adams J; Silva S; Ryder I
J Clin Pathol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):511-7. PubMed ID: 26621110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Neck dissections: emerging role of oral pathologists.
Astekar M; Choube A; Sapra G; Chitlangiya RK
J Exp Ther Oncol; 2016 Nov; 11(4):275-284. PubMed ID: 27849338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Standardized grossing protocol is useful for the pathology reporting of malignant neoplasms other than adenocarcinomas treated with pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Liszka Ł; Mrowiec S; Kuśnierz K; Kajor M
Histol Histopathol; 2017 Feb; 32(2):177-192. PubMed ID: 27180587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Factors affecting the number of lymph nodes retrieved in colorectal cancer specimens.
Ostadi MA; Harnish JL; Stegienko S; Urbach DR
Surg Endosc; 2007 Dec; 21(12):2142-6. PubMed ID: 17522917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Variance of surgeons versus pathologists in staging of colorectal cancer.
Jha MK; Corbett WA; Wilson RG; Koreli A; Papagrigoriadis S
Minerva Chir; 2006 Oct; 61(5):385-91. PubMed ID: 17159746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intraoperative pathology consultation for kidney and urinary bladder specimens.
Truong LD; Krishnan B; Shen SS
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2005 Dec; 129(12):1585-601. PubMed ID: 16329731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of second opinion pathology in the definitive management of patients with bladder carcinoma.
Coblentz TR; Mills SE; Theodorescu D
Cancer; 2001 Apr; 91(7):1284-90. PubMed ID: 11283928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Surgical pathology of lymph nodes in cancer staging: routine and specialized techniques.
Siegel RJ
Surg Oncol Clin N Am; 1996 Jan; 5(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 8789491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Modifiable factors that influence colon cancer lymph node sampling and examination.
Valsecchi ME; Leighton J; Tester W
Clin Colorectal Cancer; 2010 Jul; 9(3):162-7. PubMed ID: 20643621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic value and accuracy of imprint cytology evaluation during image-guided core needle biopsies: Review of our experience at a large academic center.
Kubik MJ; Bovbel A; Goli H; Saremian J; Siddiqi A; Masood S
Diagn Cytopathol; 2015 Oct; 43(10):773-9. PubMed ID: 26119885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Renal lymph nodes for tumor staging: appraisal of 871 nephrectomies with examination of hilar fat.
Mehta V; Mudaliar K; Ghai R; Quek ML; Milner J; Flanigan RC; Picken MM
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2013 Nov; 137(11):1584-90. PubMed ID: 23651149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Factors affecting lymph node yield in patients undergoing axillary node dissection for primary breast cancer: a single-institution review.
Lee MC; Plews R; Rawal B; Kiluk JV; Loftus L; Laronga C
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Jun; 19(6):1818-24. PubMed ID: 22203185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Breast pathology review: does it make a difference?
Romanoff AM; Cohen A; Schmidt H; Weltz CR; Jaffer SM; Nagi CS; Bleiweiss IJ; Port ER
Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 Oct; 21(11):3504-8. PubMed ID: 24859936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Second opinion and discrepancy in the diagnosis of soft tissue lesions at surgical pathology.
Sharif MA; Hamdani SN
Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2010; 53(3):460-4. PubMed ID: 20699503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cystic change in metastatic lymph nodes: a common diagnostic pitfall in fine-needle aspiration cytology.
Ustün M; Risberg B; Davidson B; Berner A
Diagn Cytopathol; 2002 Dec; 27(6):387-92. PubMed ID: 12451573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
