225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29391241)
1. Improved estimation of subject-level functional connectivity using full and partial correlation with empirical Bayes shrinkage.
Mejia AF; Nebel MB; Barber AD; Choe AS; Pekar JJ; Caffo BS; Lindquist MA
Neuroimage; 2018 May; 172():478-491. PubMed ID: 29391241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reliability modelling of resting-state functional connectivity.
Teeuw J; Hulshoff Pol HE; Boomsma DI; Brouwer RM
Neuroimage; 2021 May; 231():117842. PubMed ID: 33581291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Test-retest reliability of dynamic functional connectivity in resting state fMRI.
Zhang C; Baum SA; Adduru VR; Biswal BB; Michael AM
Neuroimage; 2018 Dec; 183():907-918. PubMed ID: 30120987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Improving reliability of subject-level resting-state fMRI parcellation with shrinkage estimators.
Mejia AF; Nebel MB; Shou H; Crainiceanu CM; Pekar JJ; Mostofsky S; Caffo B; Lindquist MA
Neuroimage; 2015 May; 112():14-29. PubMed ID: 25731998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intra-session test-retest reliability of functional connectivity in infants.
Wang Y; Hinds W; Duarte CS; Lee S; Monk C; Wall M; Canino G; Milani ACC; Jackowski A; Mamin MG; Foerster BU; Gingrich J; Weissman MM; Peterson BS; Semanek D; Perez EA; Labat E; Torres IB; Da Silva I; Parente C; Abdala N; Posner J
Neuroimage; 2021 Oct; 239():118284. PubMed ID: 34147630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bayesian Estimation of Conditional Independence Graphs Improves Functional Connectivity Estimates.
Hinne M; Janssen RJ; Heskes T; van Gerven MA
PLoS Comput Biol; 2015 Nov; 11(11):e1004534. PubMed ID: 26540089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dynamic effective connectivity in resting state fMRI.
Park HJ; Friston KJ; Pae C; Park B; Razi A
Neuroimage; 2018 Oct; 180(Pt B):594-608. PubMed ID: 29158202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Functional connectivity and structural covariance between regions of interest can be measured more accurately using multivariate distance correlation.
Geerligs L; Cam-Can ; Henson RN
Neuroimage; 2016 Jul; 135():16-31. PubMed ID: 27114055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multi-subject hierarchical inverse covariance modelling improves estimation of functional brain networks.
Colclough GL; Woolrich MW; Harrison SJ; Rojas López PA; Valdes-Sosa PA; Smith SM
Neuroimage; 2018 Sep; 178():370-384. PubMed ID: 29746906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Predicting individual brain functional connectivity using a Bayesian hierarchical model.
Dai T; Guo Y;
Neuroimage; 2017 Feb; 147():772-787. PubMed ID: 27915121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bayesian networks for fMRI: a primer.
Mumford JA; Ramsey JD
Neuroimage; 2014 Feb; 86():573-82. PubMed ID: 24140939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparing test-retest reliability of dynamic functional connectivity methods.
Choe AS; Nebel MB; Barber AD; Cohen JR; Xu Y; Pekar JJ; Caffo B; Lindquist MA
Neuroimage; 2017 Sep; 158():155-175. PubMed ID: 28687517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Variability and reliability of effective connectivity within the core default mode network: A multi-site longitudinal spectral DCM study.
Almgren H; Van de Steen F; Kühn S; Razi A; Friston K; Marinazzo D
Neuroimage; 2018 Dec; 183():757-768. PubMed ID: 30165254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Interpreting temporal fluctuations in resting-state functional connectivity MRI.
Liégeois R; Laumann TO; Snyder AZ; Zhou J; Yeo BTT
Neuroimage; 2017 Dec; 163():437-455. PubMed ID: 28916180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Hierarchical Bayesian Mixture Model Approach for Analysis of Resting-State Functional Brain Connectivity: An Alternative to Thresholding.
Gorbach T; Lundquist A; de Luna X; Nyberg L; Salami A
Brain Connect; 2020 Jun; 10(5):202-211. PubMed ID: 32308015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of scan length on the reliability of resting-state fMRI connectivity estimates.
Birn RM; Molloy EK; Patriat R; Parker T; Meier TB; Kirk GR; Nair VA; Meyerand ME; Prabhakaran V
Neuroimage; 2013 Dec; 83():550-8. PubMed ID: 23747458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Structural Basis of Large-Scale Functional Connectivity in the Mouse.
Grandjean J; Zerbi V; Balsters JH; Wenderoth N; Rudin M
J Neurosci; 2017 Aug; 37(34):8092-8101. PubMed ID: 28716961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bayesian switching factor analysis for estimating time-varying functional connectivity in fMRI.
Taghia J; Ryali S; Chen T; Supekar K; Cai W; Menon V
Neuroimage; 2017 Jul; 155():271-290. PubMed ID: 28267626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A predictor-informed multi-subject bayesian approach for dynamic functional connectivity.
Lee J; Hussain S; Warnick R; Vannucci M; Menchaca I; Seitz AR; Hu X; Peters MAK; Guindani M
PLoS One; 2024; 19(5):e0298651. PubMed ID: 38753655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluating the sensitivity of functional connectivity measures to motion artifact in resting-state fMRI data.
Mahadevan AS; Tooley UA; Bertolero MA; Mackey AP; Bassett DS
Neuroimage; 2021 Nov; 241():118408. PubMed ID: 34284108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
