These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2939183)

  • 21. The effects of noise exposure and musical training on suprathreshold auditory processing and speech perception in noise.
    Yeend I; Beach EF; Sharma M; Dillon H
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():224-236. PubMed ID: 28780178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Why do participants initiate free recall of short lists of words with the first list item? Toward a general episodic memory explanation.
    Spurgeon J; Ward G; Matthews WJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Nov; 40(6):1551-67. PubMed ID: 24933695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Short-term memory digit-span performance under auditory and visual contexts as a function of rate of digit presentation.
    Vitulli WF; McNeil MJ
    Percept Mot Skills; 1990 Dec; 71(3 Pt 2):1131-8. PubMed ID: 2087368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Detrimental effects of irrelevant speech on serial recall of visual items are reflected in reduced visual N1 and reduced theta activity.
    Weisz N; Schlittmeier SJ
    Cereb Cortex; 2006 Aug; 16(8):1097-105. PubMed ID: 16221927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. In a Concurrent Memory and Auditory Perception Task, the Pupil Dilation Response Is More Sensitive to Memory Load Than to Auditory Stimulus Characteristics.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Rönnberg J; Rudner M
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(2):272-286. PubMed ID: 29923867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effects of working memory capacity and semantic cues on the intelligibility of speech in noise.
    Zekveld AA; Rudner M; Johnsrude IS; Rönnberg J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Sep; 134(3):2225-34. PubMed ID: 23967952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Using auditory-visual speech to probe the basis of noise-impaired consonant-vowel perception in dyslexia and auditory neuropathy.
    Ramirez J; Mann V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Aug; 118(2):1122-33. PubMed ID: 16158666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cognitive abilities relate to self-reported hearing disability.
    Zekveld AA; George EL; Houtgast T; Kramer SE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Oct; 56(5):1364-72. PubMed ID: 23838985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Dynamic relation between working memory capacity and speech recognition in noise during the first 6 months of hearing aid use.
    Ng EH; Classon E; Larsby B; Arlinger S; Lunner T; Rudner M; Rönnberg J
    Trends Hear; 2014 Nov; 18():. PubMed ID: 25421088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Modelling relations between sensory processing, speech perception, orthographic and phonological ability, and literacy achievement.
    Boets B; Wouters J; van Wieringen A; De Smedt B; Ghesquière P
    Brain Lang; 2008 Jul; 106(1):29-40. PubMed ID: 18207564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Danish reading span data from 283 hearing-aid users, including a sub-group analysis of their relationship to speech-in-noise performance.
    Borch Petersen E; Lunner T; Vestergaard MD; Sundewall Thorén E
    Int J Audiol; 2016; 55(4):254-61. PubMed ID: 26836955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Musician enhancement for speech-in-noise.
    Parbery-Clark A; Skoe E; Lam C; Kraus N
    Ear Hear; 2009 Dec; 30(6):653-61. PubMed ID: 19734788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Echoic and retrieval accounts of the long-term modality effect tested using the suffix procedure.
    Huang ST; Glenberg AM
    Am J Psychol; 1986; 99(4):453-70. PubMed ID: 3812815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Interrelationships of perceptual modality, short-term memory and reading achievement.
    Barker BM
    Percept Mot Skills; 1976 Dec; 43(3 pt. 1):771-4. PubMed ID: 1012863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Recency and suffix effects with immediate recall of olfactory stimuli.
    Miles C; Jenkins R
    Memory; 2000 May; 8(3):195-205. PubMed ID: 10889902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Audiovisual training is better than auditory-only training for auditory-only speech-in-noise identification.
    Lidestam B; Moradi S; Pettersson R; Ricklefs T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):EL142-7. PubMed ID: 25096138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Aspects of short-term acoustic recognition memory: modality and serial position effects.
    McFarland DJ; Cacace AT
    Audiology; 1992; 31(6):342-52. PubMed ID: 1492818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evidence for a modality effect in sentence retention.
    Rummer R; Schweppe J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Dec; 12(6):1094-9. PubMed ID: 16615334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Disruption of visual short-term memory by changing-state auditory stimuli: the role of segmentation.
    Jones DM; Macken WJ; Murray AC
    Mem Cognit; 1993 May; 21(3):318-28. PubMed ID: 8316094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Acoustic memory of the speech evoked by a 22-channel cochlear implant].
    Kumakawa K
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1991 Aug; 94(8):1136-41. PubMed ID: 1960594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.