These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29392149)

  • 1. Comparison of Matrix Frequency-Doubling Technology (FDT) Perimetry with the SWEDISH Interactive Thresholding Algorithm (SITA) Standard Automated Perimetry (SAP) in Mild Glaucoma.
    Doozandeh A; Irandoost F; Mirzajani A; Yazdani S; Pakravan M; Esfandiari H
    Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol; 2017; 6(3):98-104. PubMed ID: 29392149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of standard automated perimetry, frequency-doubling technology perimetry, and short-wavelength automated perimetry for detection of glaucoma.
    Liu S; Lam S; Weinreb RN; Ye C; Cheung CY; Lai G; Lam DS; Leung CK
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Sep; 52(10):7325-31. PubMed ID: 21810975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relationship of SITA and full-threshold standard perimetry to frequency-doubling technology perimetry in glaucoma.
    Boden C; Pascual J; Medeiros FA; Aihara M; Weinreb RN; Sample PA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2433-9. PubMed ID: 15980232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Frequency doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in detection of glaucoma among glaucoma suspects.
    Patyal S; Kotwal A; Banarji A; Gurunadh VS
    Med J Armed Forces India; 2014 Oct; 70(4):332-7. PubMed ID: 25382906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of matrix frequency-doubling technology perimetry and standard automated perimetry in monitoring the development of visual field defects for glaucoma suspect eyes.
    Hu R; Wang C; Racette L
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0178079. PubMed ID: 28542536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of visual field defects using matrix perimetry and standard achromatic perimetry.
    Patel A; Wollstein G; Ishikawa H; Schuman JS
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Mar; 114(3):480-7. PubMed ID: 17123623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of visual field test results obtained through Humphrey matrix frequency doubling technology perimetry versus standard automated perimetry in healthy children.
    Kocabeyoglu S; Uzun S; Mocan MC; Bozkurt B; Irkec M; Orhan M
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2013 Oct; 61(10):576-9. PubMed ID: 24145558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Frequency-doubling perimetry: comparison with standard automated perimetry to detect glaucoma.
    Leeprechanon N; Giangiacomo A; Fontana H; Hoffman D; Caprioli J
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Feb; 143(2):263-271. PubMed ID: 17178091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Standard automated perimetry versus matrix frequency doubling technology perimetry in subjects with ocular hypertension and healthy control subjects.
    Lamparter J; Aliyeva S; Schulze A; Berres M; Pfeiffer N; Hoffmann EM
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(2):e57663. PubMed ID: 23469043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relationship between Humphrey 30-2 SITA Standard Test, Matrix 30-2 threshold test, and Heidelberg retina tomograph in ocular hypertensive and glaucoma patients.
    Bozkurt B; Yilmaz PT; Irkec M
    J Glaucoma; 2008; 17(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 18414106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diagnostic accuracy of the Matrix 24-2 and original N-30 frequency-doubling technology tests compared with standard automated perimetry.
    Racette L; Medeiros FA; Zangwill LM; Ng D; Weinreb RN; Sample PA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Mar; 49(3):954-60. PubMed ID: 18326718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma.
    Artes PH; Hutchison DM; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2451-7. PubMed ID: 15980235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Frequency-doubling technology perimetry for detection of the development of visual field defects in glaucoma suspect eyes: a prospective study.
    Liu S; Yu M; Weinreb RN; Lai G; Lam DS; Leung CK
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2014 Jan; 132(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 24177945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Frequency doubling technology perimetry in open-angle glaucoma eyes with hemifield visual field damage: comparison of high-tension and normal-tension groups.
    Murata H; Tomidokoro A; Matsuo H; Tomita G; Araie M
    J Glaucoma; 2007 Jan; 16(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 17224743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Standard achromatic perimetry, short wavelength automated perimetry, and frequency doubling technology for detection of glaucoma damage.
    Soliman MA; de Jong LA; Ismaeil AA; van den Berg TJ; de Smet MD
    Ophthalmology; 2002 Mar; 109(3):444-54. PubMed ID: 11874745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Visual Field Tests for Glaucoma Patients With Initial Macular Damage: Comparison Between Frequency-doubling Technology and Standard Automated Perimetry Using 24-2 or 10-2 Visual Fields.
    Park HL; Lee J; Park CK
    J Glaucoma; 2018 Jul; 27(7):627-634. PubMed ID: 29750715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison between frequency-doubling technology perimetry and standard automated perimetry in early glaucoma.
    Kim SA; Park CK; Park HL
    Sci Rep; 2022 Jun; 12(1):10173. PubMed ID: 35715424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reproducibility of visual field end point criteria for standard automated perimetry, full-threshold, and Swedish interactive thresholding algorithm strategies: diagnostic innovations in glaucoma study.
    Bourne RR; Jahanbakhsh K; Boden C; Zangwill LM; Hoffmann EM; Medeiros FA; Weinreb RN; Sample PA
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Dec; 144(6):908-913. PubMed ID: 17919445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detecting visual function abnormalities using the Swedish interactive threshold algorithm and matrix perimetry in eyes with glaucomatous appearance of the optic disc.
    Sakata LM; Deleon-Ortega J; Arthur SN; Monheit BE; Girkin CA
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2007 Mar; 125(3):340-5. PubMed ID: 17353404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of Standard Automated Perimetry, Short-Wavelength Automated Perimetry, and Frequency-Doubling Technology Perimetry to Monitor Glaucoma Progression.
    Hu R; Wang C; Gu Y; Racette L
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Feb; 95(7):e2618. PubMed ID: 26886602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.