These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29392726)
1. Univariate and Linear Composite Asymmetry Statistics for the "Pair-Matching" of Bone Antimeres. Lee AB; Konigsberg LW J Forensic Sci; 2018 Nov; 63(6):1796-1801. PubMed ID: 29392726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Power of Exclusion using Automated Osteometric Sorting: Pair-Matching. Lynch JJ; Byrd J; LeGarde CB J Forensic Sci; 2018 Mar; 63(2):371-380. PubMed ID: 28547802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An Analysis on the Choice of Alpha Level in the Osteometric Pair-matching of the Os Coxa, Scapula, and Clavicle. Lynch JJ J Forensic Sci; 2018 May; 63(3):793-797. PubMed ID: 28718882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Tables for the metric evaluation of pair-matching of human skeletal elements. Thomas RM; Ubelaker DH; Byrd JE J Forensic Sci; 2013 Jul; 58(4):952-6. PubMed ID: 23682771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multimethod Resolution of a Small-Scale Case of Commingling. Finlayson JE; Bartelink EJ; Perrone A; Dalton K J Forensic Sci; 2017 Mar; 62(2):493-497. PubMed ID: 27864949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A new method to pair-match metacarpals using bilateral asymmetry and shape analysis. Garrido-Varas C; Rathnasinghe R; Thompson T; Savriama Y J Forensic Sci; 2015 Jan; 60(1):118-23. PubMed ID: 25056421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bilateral Asymmetry of Nutrient Foramen Position in Forearm Bones: Implications for its Use in Sorting Commingled Remains. Vehit U; Christensen AM J Forensic Sci; 2019 Jan; 64(1):186-189. PubMed ID: 29975981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An Automated Two-dimensional Pairwise form Registration Method for Pair-matching of Fragmented Skeletal Remains. Lynch JJ J Forensic Sci; 2018 Nov; 63(6):1790-1795. PubMed ID: 29637565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Osteometric sorting of skeletal elements from a sample of modern Colombians: a pilot study. Rodríguez JM; Hackman L; Martínez W; Medina CS Int J Legal Med; 2016 Mar; 130(2):541-50. PubMed ID: 25588668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Some power considerations when deciding to use transformations. Kingman A; Zion G Stat Med; 1994 Mar 15-Apr 15; 13(5-7):769-83. PubMed ID: 8023049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Next-generation osteometric sorting: Using 3D shape, elliptical Fourier analysis, and Hausdorff distance to optimize osteological pair-matching. Fancourt HSM; Lynch JJ; Byrd JE; Stephan CN J Forensic Sci; 2021 May; 66(3):821-836. PubMed ID: 33550609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pair-Matching Digital 3D Models of Temporomandibular Fragments Using Mesh-To-Mesh Value Comparison and Implications for Commingled Human Remain Assemblages. Acuff AS; Karell MA; Spanakis KE; Kranioti EF Adv Exp Med Biol; 2021; 1317():1-16. PubMed ID: 33945129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An Automated Two-Dimensional Form Registration Method for Osteological Pair-Matching. Lynch JJ J Forensic Sci; 2018 Jul; 63(4):1236-1242. PubMed ID: 29044522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]