These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29393767)

  • 1. Examining the Validity of the North American Veterinary Licensing Examination (NAVLE) Time Constraints.
    Feinberg RA; Jurich D; Lord J; Case H; Hawley J
    J Vet Med Educ; 2018; 45(3):381-387. PubMed ID: 29393767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Correlation of pre-veterinary admissions criteria, intra-professional curriculum measures, AVMA-COE professional competency scores, and the NAVLE.
    Roush JK; Rush BR; White BJ; Wilkerson MJ
    J Vet Med Educ; 2014; 41(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 24152428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relationships among common measures of student performance and scores on the North American Veterinary Licensing Examination.
    Danielson JA; Wu TF; Molgaard LK; Preast VA
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2011 Feb; 238(4):454-61. PubMed ID: 21320014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. North American Veterinary Licensing Examination pacing study.
    Subhiyah RG; Boyce JR
    J Vet Med Educ; 2010; 37(4):377-82. PubMed ID: 21135405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of timing changes on examinee pacing on the USMLE Step 2 exam.
    Swygert K; Muller E; Clauser BE; Dillon GF; Swanson DB
    Acad Med; 2004 Oct; 79(10 Suppl):S52-4. PubMed ID: 15383389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. GRE and Undergraduate GPA as Predictors of Veterinary Medical School Grade Point Average, VEA Scores and NAVLE Scores While Accounting for Range Restriction.
    Danielson JA; Burzette RG
    Front Vet Sci; 2020; 7():576354. PubMed ID: 33195578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Revisiting Retake Policy: Analyzing the Success Rates of Examinees With Multiple Attempts on the United States Medical Licensing Examination.
    Rubright JD; Ong TQ; Jodoin MG; Johnson DA; Barone MA
    Acad Med; 2022 Aug; 97(8):1219-1225. PubMed ID: 35442911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of repeat information on examinee performance for a large-scale standardized-patient examination.
    Swygert KA; Balog KP; Jobe A
    Acad Med; 2010 Sep; 85(9):1506-10. PubMed ID: 20736678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development, administration, and validity evidence of a subspecialty preparatory test toward licensure: a pilot study.
    Johnson J; Schwartz A; Lineberry M; Rehman F; Park YS
    BMC Med Educ; 2018 Aug; 18(1):176. PubMed ID: 30068394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A multilevel analysis of the relationships between selected examinee characteristics and United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 2 Clinical Knowledge performance: revisiting old findings and asking new questions.
    Cuddy MM; Swanson DB; Dillon GF; Holtman MC; Clauser BE
    Acad Med; 2006 Oct; 81(10 Suppl):S103-7. PubMed ID: 17001117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluating construct equivalence and criterion-related validity for repeat examinees on a standardized patient examination.
    Raymond MR; Kahraman N; Swygert KA; Balog KP
    Acad Med; 2011 Oct; 86(10):1253-9. PubMed ID: 21869669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multiple mini-interview predictive validity for performance on a pharmacy licensing examination.
    Cameron AJ; MacKeigan LD; Mitsakakis N; Pugsley JA
    Med Educ; 2017 Apr; 51(4):379-389. PubMed ID: 28118682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. F-type testlets and the effects of feedback and case-specificity.
    Baldwin P; Baldwin SG; Haist SA
    Acad Med; 2011 Oct; 86(10 Suppl):S55-8; quiz S58. PubMed ID: 21955770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Overview and current management of computerized adaptive testing in licensing/certification examinations.
    Seo DG
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2017; 14():17. PubMed ID: 28811394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of first-encounter pretest on pass/fail rates of a clinical skills medical licensure examination.
    Roberts WL; McKinley DW; Boulet JR
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2010 May; 15(2):219-27. PubMed ID: 19757128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is it feasible to include a technical skill station on a national licensing examination?
    Friedlich M; Smee S; Wood T
    Am J Surg; 2007 Jan; 193(1):86-9. PubMed ID: 17188094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of test item disclosure on medical licensing examination.
    Yang EB; Lee MA; Park YS
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2018 May; 23(2):265-274. PubMed ID: 28762088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Within-session score gains for repeat examinees on a standardized patient examination.
    Chavez AK; Swygert KA; Peitzman SJ; Raymond MR
    Acad Med; 2013 May; 88(5):688-92. PubMed ID: 23524920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gender differences in examinee performance on the Step 2 Clinical Skills data gathering (DG) and patient note (PN) components.
    Swygert KA; Cuddy MM; van Zanten M; Haist SA; Jobe AC
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2012 Oct; 17(4):557-71. PubMed ID: 22041870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Examining changes in certification/licensure requirements and the international medical graduate examinee pool.
    McKinley DW; Hess BJ; Boulet JR; Lipner RS
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2014 Mar; 19(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 23605098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.