These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29393819)

  • 21. Feature-based and spatial attentional selection in visual working memory.
    Heuer A; Schubö A
    Mem Cognit; 2016 May; 44(4):621-32. PubMed ID: 26754949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Role of attentional tags in working memory-driven attentional capture.
    Kuo CY; Chao HF
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Aug; 40(4):1301-7. PubMed ID: 24730739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The interplay of spatial attentional biases and mental codes in VSTM: Developmentally informed hypotheses.
    Shimi A; Scerif G
    Dev Psychol; 2015 Jun; 51(6):731-43. PubMed ID: 25844847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Forget Me if You Can: Attentional capture by to-Be-remembered and to-Be-forgotten visual stimuli.
    Sasin E; Morey CC; Nieuwenstein M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Oct; 24(5):1643-1650. PubMed ID: 28074450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Distinct roles of the intraparietal sulcus and temporoparietal junction in attentional capture from distractor features: An individual differences approach.
    Painter DR; Dux PE; Mattingley JB
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Jul; 74():50-62. PubMed ID: 25724234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The short- and long-term fates of memory items retained outside the focus of attention.
    LaRocque JJ; Eichenbaum AS; Starrett MJ; Rose NS; Emrich SM; Postle BR
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Apr; 43(3):453-68. PubMed ID: 25472902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Electrophysiological evidence for enhanced representation of food stimuli in working memory.
    Rutters F; Kumar S; Higgs S; Humphreys GW
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Feb; 233(2):519-28. PubMed ID: 25354971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Response, rather than target detection, triggers the attentional boost effect in visual search.
    Toh YN; Lee VG
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 Jan; 48(1):77-93. PubMed ID: 35073145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Gaze cues influence memory…but not for long.
    Dodd MD; Weiss N; McDonnell GP; Sarwal A; Kingstone A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Oct; 141(2):270-5. PubMed ID: 22742661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Remembered but unused: the accessory items in working memory that do not guide attention.
    Peters JC; Goebel R; Roelfsema PR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 21(6):1081-91. PubMed ID: 18702589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Attending to items in working memory: evidence that refreshing and memory search are closely related.
    Vergauwe E; Cowan N
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Aug; 22(4):1001-6. PubMed ID: 25361821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Attentional flexibility and prioritization improves long-term memory.
    Sandry J; Zuppichini MD; Ricker TJ
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Jul; 208():103104. PubMed ID: 32622150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Attentional instructions modulate differential context-switch effects after short and long training in human predictive learning.
    Callejas-Aguilera JE; Cubillas CP; Rosas JM
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2019 Oct; 45(4):474-484. PubMed ID: 31081658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Corresponding influences of top-down control on task switching and long-term memory.
    Richter FR; Yeung N
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(6):1124-47. PubMed ID: 25337969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The blocking effect in associative learning involves learned biases in rapid attentional capture.
    Luque D; Vadillo MA; Gutiérrez-Cobo MJ; Le Pelley ME
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Feb; 71(2):522-544. PubMed ID: 27874321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. How do observer's responses affect visual long-term memory?
    Makovski T; Jiang YV; Swallow KM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jul; 39(4):1097-105. PubMed ID: 23206170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Why does the probe value effect emerge in working memory? Examining the biased attentional refreshing account.
    Atkinson AL; Oberauer K; Allen RJ; Souza AS
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Jun; 29(3):891-900. PubMed ID: 35091995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The bilateral field advantage effect in memory precision.
    Zhang Y; Ye C; Roberson D; Zhao G; Xue C; Liu Q
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Mar; 71(3):749-758. PubMed ID: 28067595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Reward associations impact both iconic and visual working memory.
    Infanti E; Hickey C; Turatto M
    Vision Res; 2015 Feb; 107():22-9. PubMed ID: 25481632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Rapid top-down control over template-guided attention shifts to multiple objects.
    Grubert A; Fahrenfort J; Olivers CNL; Eimer M
    Neuroimage; 2017 Feb; 146():843-858. PubMed ID: 27554532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.