128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29394915)
1. Trend analysis of the quality indicators for the Brazilian cervical cancer screening programme by region and state from 2006 to 2013.
Costa RFA; Longatto-Filho A; de Lima Vazquez F; Pinheiro C; Zeferino LC; Fregnani JHTG
BMC Cancer; 2018 Feb; 18(1):126. PubMed ID: 29394915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Historical Analysis of the Brazilian Cervical Cancer Screening Program from 2006 to 2013: A Time for Reflection.
Costa RF; Longatto-Filho A; Pinheiro C; Zeferino LC; Fregnani JH
PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0138945. PubMed ID: 26402737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Quality of Pap Smears from the Brazilian Cervical Cancer Screening Program According to the Human Development Index.
Costa RFA; Longatto-Filho A; de Lima Vazquez F; Pinheiro C; Zeferino LC; Fregnani JHTG
Cancer Prev Res (Phila); 2020 Mar; 13(3):299-308. PubMed ID: 31836602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The implementation of an organised cervical screening programme in Poland: an analysis of the adherence to European guidelines.
Nowakowski A; Cybulski M; Śliwczyński A; Chil A; Teter Z; Seroczyński P; Arbyn M; Anttila A
BMC Cancer; 2015 Apr; 15():279. PubMed ID: 25879466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Temporal changes in breast cancer screening coverage provided under the Brazilian National Health Service between 2008 and 2017.
Rodrigues DCN; Freitas-Junior R; Rahal RMS; da Silveira Corrêa R; Gouveia PA; Peixoto JE; Martins E; Soares LR
BMC Public Health; 2019 Jul; 19(1):959. PubMed ID: 31319826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The cervical cancer screening programme in Norway, 1992-2000: changes in Pap smear coverage and incidence of cervical cancer.
Nygård JF; Skare GB; Thoresen SØ
J Med Screen; 2002; 9(2):86-91. PubMed ID: 12133929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Performance indicators in a newly established organized cervical screening programme: registry-based analysis in the Czech Republic.
Májek O; Dušková J; Dvořák V; Beková A; Klimeš D; Blaha M; Anttila A; Dušek L
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2017 May; 26(3):232-239. PubMed ID: 26908155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Evaluation of cervical cancer control actions within Brazil and its regions based on data recorded in the Brazilian Unified National Health System].
Silva GAE; Alcantara LLM; Tomazelli JG; Ribeiro CM; Girianelli VR; Santos ÉC; Claro IB; Almeida PF; Lima LD
Cad Saude Publica; 2022; 38(7):e00041722. PubMed ID: 35894365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cervical cancer screening among women aged 18-30 years - United States, 2000-2010.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 2013 Jan; 61(51-52):1038-42. PubMed ID: 23282861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [The 1996 revision of the Dutch cervical cancer screening programme: increased coverage, fewer repeat smears and less opportunistic screening].
Berkers LM; van Ballegooijen M; van Kemenade FJ; Rebolj M; Essink-Bot ML; Helmerhorst TJ; Habbema JD
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2007 Jun; 151(23):1288-94. PubMed ID: 17624160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Trend analysis of process quality indicators for the Korean National Cervical Cancer Screening Program from 2005 to 2013.
Bui CN; Choi E; Suh M; Jun JK; Jung KW; Lim MC; Choi KS
J Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Jan; 32(1):e14. PubMed ID: 33327046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Progress in cancer screening practices in the United States: results from the 2000 National Health Interview Survey.
Swan J; Breen N; Coates RJ; Rimer BK; Lee NC
Cancer; 2003 Mar; 97(6):1528-40. PubMed ID: 12627518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Self-collection for high-risk HPV detection in Brazilian women using the careHPV™ test.
Lorenzi AT; Fregnani JH; Possati-Resende JC; Neto CS; Villa LL; Longatto-Filho A
Gynecol Oncol; 2013 Oct; 131(1):131-4. PubMed ID: 23880151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Trend in cervical cancer screening in Spain (2003-2009) and predictors of adherence.
Martín-López R; Hernández-Barrera V; de Andres AL; Carrasco-Garrido P; de Miguel AG; Jimenez-Garcia R
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2012 Jan; 21(1):82-8. PubMed ID: 22129658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Barriers to cervical cancer screening in women attending the Family Medical Program in Niterói, Rio de Janeiro.
Augusto EF; Rosa ML; Cavalcanti SM; Oliveira LH
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Jan; 287(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 22886356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the National Cervical Cancer Screening Programme of Bangladesh and the formulation of quality assurance guidelines.
Basu P; Nessa A; Majid M; Rahman JN; Ahmed T
J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care; 2010 Jul; 36(3):131-4. PubMed ID: 20659365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An audit of the cervical cancer screening histories of 246 women with carcinoma.
Duggan MA; Nation J
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2012 Jul; 16(3):263-70. PubMed ID: 22297213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Primary care factors associated with cervical screening coverage in England.
Bang JY; Yadegarfar G; Soljak M; Majeed A
J Public Health (Oxf); 2012 Dec; 34(4):532-8. PubMed ID: 22518028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cervical cancer risk levels in Turkey and compliance to the national cervical cancer screening standard.
Açikgöz A; Ergör G
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(4):923-7. PubMed ID: 21790227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cervical cancer screening in the United States, 1993-2010: characteristics of women who are never screened.
Chen HY; Kessler CL; Mori N; Chauhan SP
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2012 Nov; 21(11):1132-8. PubMed ID: 22873781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
