440 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29395219)
1. A systematic literature review of tibial plateau fractures: What classifications are used and how reliable and useful are they?
Millar SC; Arnold JB; Thewlis D; Fraysse F; Solomon LB
Injury; 2018 Mar; 49(3):473-490. PubMed ID: 29395219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Two column classification of tibial plateau fractures; description, clinical application and reliability.
Anwar A; Zhang Y; Zhao Z; Gao Y; Sha L; Lv D; Zhang Z; Lv G; Zhang Y; Nazir MU; Qasim W; Wang Y
Injury; 2019 Jun; 50(6):1247-1255. PubMed ID: 31040027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability assessment of tibial plateau fracture classification systems.
Taşkesen A; Demirkale İ; Okkaoğlu MC; Özdemir M; Bilgili MG; Altay M
Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi; 2017 Dec; 28(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 29125816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Two-dimensional and three-dimensional computed tomography for the classification and characterisation of tibial plateau fractures.
Doornberg JN; Rademakers MV; van den Bekerom MP; Kerkhoffs GM; Ahn J; Steller EP; Kloen P
Injury; 2011 Dec; 42(12):1416-25. PubMed ID: 21570072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Inter- and intra-observer variation of the Schatzker and AO/OTA classifications of tibial plateau fractures and a proposal of a new classification system.
Charalambous CP; Tryfonidis M; Alvi F; Moran M; Fang C; Samarji R; Hirst P
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2007 May; 89(4):400-4. PubMed ID: 17535620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Three-dimensional computed tomography imaging increases the reliability of classification systems for tibial plateau fractures.
Hu YL; Ye FG; Ji AY; Qiao GX; Liu HF
Injury; 2009 Dec; 40(12):1282-5. PubMed ID: 19535056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reliability of a four-column classification for tibial plateau fractures.
Martínez-Rondanelli A; Escobar-González SS; Henao-Alzate A; Martínez-Cano JP
Int Orthop; 2017 Sep; 41(9):1881-1886. PubMed ID: 28685399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Classification systems for tibial plateau fractures; does computed tomography scanning improve their reliability?
Brunner A; Horisberger M; Ulmar B; Hoffmann A; Babst R
Injury; 2010 Feb; 41(2):173-8. PubMed ID: 19744652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intra- and inter-observer reliability assessment of widely used classifications and the "Ten-segment classification" of tibial plateau fractures.
Yao P; Liu Y; Shan L; Zhao Y; Wang D; He Y; Wang H; Zeeshan Waheed M; Lu T; Zhou J
Knee; 2022 Mar; 35():149-156. PubMed ID: 35313243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Tibial plateau fractures: reproducibility of three classifications (Schatzker, AO, Duparc) and a revised Duparc classification.
Gicquel T; Najihi N; Vendeuvre T; Teyssedou S; Gayet LE; Huten D
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2013 Nov; 99(7):805-16. PubMed ID: 24120208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Interobserver reliability of the Schatzker and Luo classification systems for tibial plateau fractures.
Mellema JJ; Doornberg JN; Molenaars RJ; Ring D; Kloen P;
Injury; 2016 Apr; 47(4):944-9. PubMed ID: 26777468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The classification systems for tibial plateau fractures: how reliable are they?
Maripuri SN; Rao P; Manoj-Thomas A; Mohanty K
Injury; 2008 Oct; 39(10):1216-21. PubMed ID: 18439607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. AO or Schatzker? How reliable is classification of tibial plateau fractures?
Walton NP; Harish S; Roberts C; Blundell C
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2003 Oct; 123(8):396-8. PubMed ID: 14574596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The pivotal role of the coronal fracture line for a new three-dimensional CT-based fracture classification of bicondylar proximal tibial fractures.
Pätzold R; Friederichs J; von Rüden C; Panzer S; Bühren V; Augat P
Injury; 2017 Oct; 48(10):2214-2220. PubMed ID: 28711171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of addition of 2DCT scans and 3DCT scans for the classification of tibial plateau fractures: a systematic review.
Huitema JM; van der Gaast N; Jaarsma RL; Doornberg JN; Edwards MJR; Hermans E
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg; 2024 Feb; 50(1):71-79. PubMed ID: 37768386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An evaluation of intra and inter observer reliability of the five used classification systems of tibial plateau fractures.
Koksal A; Abul K; Kargın D; Cimen O; Mert M; Keskin A
Acta Orthop Belg; 2022 Dec; 88(4):805-810. PubMed ID: 36800667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Three-column classification and Schatzker classification: a three- and two-dimensional computed tomography characterisation and analysis of tibial plateau fractures.
Patange Subba Rao SP; Lewis J; Haddad Z; Paringe V; Mohanty K
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2014 Oct; 24(7):1263-70. PubMed ID: 24013813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. What is the most reproducible classification system to assess tibial plateau fractures?
Millán-Billi A; Gómez-Masdeu M; Ramírez-Bermejo E; Ibañez M; Gelber PE
Int Orthop; 2017 Jun; 41(6):1251-1256. PubMed ID: 28405810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. WhatsApp Messenger is useful and reproducible in the assessment of tibial plateau fractures: inter- and intra-observer agreement study.
Giordano V; Koch HA; Mendes CH; Bergamin A; de Souza FS; do Amaral NP
Int J Med Inform; 2015 Feb; 84(2):141-8. PubMed ID: 25468642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Computed tomography-based Three-Column Classification in tibial plateau fractures: introduction of its utility and assessment of its reproducibility.
Zhu Y; Yang G; Luo CF; Smith WR; Hu CF; Gao H; Zhong B; Zeng BF
J Trauma Acute Care Surg; 2012 Sep; 73(3):731-7. PubMed ID: 22929503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
