These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29395806)

  • 41. Clinical outcomes for neurogenic claudication using a multimodal program for lumbar spinal stenosis: a retrospective study.
    Ammendolia C; Chow N
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2015; 38(3):188-94. PubMed ID: 25620608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis: four-year outcomes from the maine lumbar spine study.
    Atlas SJ; Keller RB; Robson D; Deyo RA; Singer DE
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 Mar; 25(5):556-62. PubMed ID: 10749631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Influence of depression symptoms on patient expectations and clinical outcomes in the surgical management of spinal stenosis.
    Urban-Baeza A; Zárate-Kalfópulos B; Romero-Vargas S; Obil-Chavarría C; Brenes-Rojas L; Reyes-Sánchez A
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Jan; 22(1):75-9. PubMed ID: 25380536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Patient-based outcomes for the operative treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Fokter SK; Yerby SA
    Eur Spine J; 2006 Nov; 15(11):1661-9. PubMed ID: 16369827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Preoperative Zung Depression Scale predicts outcome after revision lumbar surgery for adjacent segment disease, recurrent stenosis, and pseudarthrosis.
    Adogwa O; Parker SL; Shau DN; Mendenhall SK; Aaronson OS; Cheng JS; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
    Spine J; 2012 Mar; 12(3):179-85. PubMed ID: 21937282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Revision lumbar surgery in elderly patients with symptomatic pseudarthrosis, adjacent-segment disease, or same-level recurrent stenosis. Part 1. Two-year outcomes and clinical efficacy: clinical article.
    Adogwa O; Carr RK; Kudyba K; Karikari I; Bagley CA; Gokaslan ZL; Theodore N; Cheng JS
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Feb; 18(2):139-46. PubMed ID: 23231354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Clinical evaluation of the preliminary safety and effectiveness of a minimally invasive interspinous process device APERIUS(®) in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis with symptomatic neurogenic intermittent claudication.
    Van Meirhaeghe J; Fransen P; Morelli D; Craig NJ; Godde G; Mihalyi A; Collignon F
    Eur Spine J; 2012 Dec; 21(12):2565-72. PubMed ID: 22565799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Distraction Laminoplasty With Interlaminar Lumbar Instrumented Fusion (ILIF) for Lumbar Stenosis With or Without Grade 1 Spondylolisthesis: Technique and 2-Year Outcomes.
    Cuéllar JM; Field JS; Bae HW
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Apr; 41 Suppl 8():S97-S105. PubMed ID: 26839990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. An outcome measure of functionality in patients with lumber spinal stenosis: a validation study of the Iranian version of Neurogenic Claudication Outcome Score (NCOS).
    Azimi P; Mohammadi HR; Montazeri A
    BMC Neurol; 2012 Sep; 12():101. PubMed ID: 23006983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Modified Marmot operation versus spinous process transverse cutting laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Kawakami M; Nakao S; Fukui D; Kadosaka Y; Matsuoka T; Yamada H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Nov; 38(23):E1461-8. PubMed ID: 23778375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Supervised physical therapy versus unsupervised exercise for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: 1-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.
    Minetama M; Kawakami M; Teraguchi M; Kagotani R; Mera Y; Sumiya T; Nakagawa M; Yamamoto Y; Matsuo S; Sakon N; Nakatani T; Kitano T; Nakagawa Y
    Clin Rehabil; 2021 Jul; 35(7):964-975. PubMed ID: 33423549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Influence of pain sensitivity on surgical outcomes after lumbar spine surgery in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Kim HJ; Lee JI; Kang KT; Chang BS; Lee CK; Ruscheweyh R; Kang SS; Yeom JS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Feb; 40(3):193-200. PubMed ID: 25384051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Patient are satisfied one year after decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Paulsen RT; Bouknaitir JB; Fruensgaard S; Carreron L; Andersen M
    Dan Med J; 2016 Nov; 63(11):. PubMed ID: 27808037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Surgical results in hidden lumbar spinal stenosis detected by axial loaded computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging: an outcome study.
    Willén J; Wessberg PJ; Danielsson B
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Feb; 33(4):E109-15. PubMed ID: 18277859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Clinical classification of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis based on their leg pain syndrome: its correlation with 2-year surgical outcome.
    Yamashita K; Aono H; Yamasaki R
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Apr; 32(9):980-5. PubMed ID: 17450073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The critical cutoff point of the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score indicating locomotive syndrome in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis.
    Araki M; Nonoshita H; Kitano S; Shigematsu H; Tanaka M; Kawasaki S; Suga Y; Yamamoto Y; Tanaka Y
    J Orthop Sci; 2021 Mar; 26(2):290-294. PubMed ID: 32253080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. A prospective study of recovery from leg numbness following decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Oba H; Tsutsumimoto T; Yui M; Kamanaka T; Ohta H; Kosaku H; Misawa H
    J Orthop Sci; 2017 Jul; 22(4):670-675. PubMed ID: 28456353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Comprehensive Nonsurgical Treatment Versus Self-directed Care to Improve Walking Ability in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Randomized Trial.
    Ammendolia C; Côté P; Southerst D; Schneider M; Budgell B; Bombardier C; Hawker G; Rampersaud YR
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2018 Dec; 99(12):2408-2419.e2. PubMed ID: 29935152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Minimally invasive decompression versus x-stop in lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized controlled multicenter study.
    Lønne G; Johnsen LG; Rossvoll I; Andresen H; Storheim K; Zwart JA; Nygaard ØP
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Jan; 40(2):77-85. PubMed ID: 25575084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Quality of life of lumbar stenosis-treated patients in whom the X STOP interspinous device was implanted.
    Hsu KY; Zucherman JF; Hartjen CA; Mehalic TF; Implicito DA; Martin MJ; Johnson DR; Skidmore GA; Vessa PP; Dwyer JW; Cauthen JC; Ozuna RM
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2006 Dec; 5(6):500-7. PubMed ID: 17176013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.