222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29396035)
1. Demonstration of simulated annealing optimization for permanent breast seed implant treatment planning.
Roumeliotis M; Yates B; Watt E; Frederick A; Meyer T
Brachytherapy; 2018; 17(3):615-620. PubMed ID: 29396035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Incorporating three-dimensional ultrasound into permanent breast seed implant brachytherapy treatment planning.
Morton D; Batchelar D; Hilts M; Berrang T; Crook J
Brachytherapy; 2017; 16(1):167-173. PubMed ID: 27771242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Appropriate timing for postimplant imaging in permanent breast seed implant: Results from a serial CT study.
Watt E; Conroy L; Peacock M; Roumeliotis M; Frederick A; Husain S; Meyer T
Brachytherapy; 2018; 17(3):609-614. PubMed ID: 29496424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Adaptation of the CVT algorithm for catheter optimization in high dose rate brachytherapy.
Poulin E; Fekete CA; Létourneau M; Fenster A; Pouliot J; Beaulieu L
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111724. PubMed ID: 24320432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A postimplant dosimetry simulation framework for robustness evaluation in permanent breast seed implant brachytherapy.
Zhang C; Andrews JL; Batchelar D; Crook J; Hilts M
Brachytherapy; 2024; 23(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 37949759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of inverse planning simulated annealing and geometrical optimization for prostate high-dose-rate brachytherapy.
Hsu IC; Lessard E; Weinberg V; Pouliot J
Brachytherapy; 2004; 3(3):147-52. PubMed ID: 15533807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optimization and comparison of balloon-based partial breast brachytherapy using a single source, a standard plan line source, and both forward and inverse planned multilumen techniques.
Eyre K; Whitney D; Mukesh M; Wilson C; Coles C
Brachytherapy; 2013; 12(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 22732322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dosimetric comparison of volume-based and inverse planning simulated annealing-based dose optimizations for high-dose rate brachytherapy.
Pelagade S; Maddirala HR; Misra R; Suryanarayan U; Neema JP
Med Dosim; 2015; 40(3):235-9. PubMed ID: 25795565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Feasibility study of defining planning target volume using surgical margins in permanent breast seed implant brachytherapy.
Zhang C; Hilts M; Batchelar D; Crook J
Brachytherapy; 2023; 22(1):101-107. PubMed ID: 36244908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of HDR interstitial breast implants planned by conventional and optimized CT-based dosimetry systems with respect to dose homogeneity and conformality.
Major T; Fodor J; Takácsi-Nagy Z; Agoston P; Polgár C
Strahlenther Onkol; 2005 Feb; 181(2):89-96. PubMed ID: 15702297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of single and multiple dwell position methods in MammoSite high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy planning.
Kim Y; Trombetta MG; Miften M
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2010 May; 11(3):3235. PubMed ID: 20717093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Three dimensional intensity modulated brachytherapy (IMBT): dosimetry algorithm and inverse treatment planning.
Shi C; Guo B; Cheng CY; Esquivel C; Eng T; Papanikolaou N
Med Phys; 2010 Jul; 37(7):3725-37. PubMed ID: 20831080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Patient-specific Monte Carlo-based dose-kernel approach for inverse planning in afterloading brachytherapy.
D'Amours M; Pouliot J; Dagnault A; Verhaegen F; Beaulieu L
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Dec; 81(5):1582-9. PubMed ID: 21075547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of IPSA and HIPO inverse planning optimization algorithms for prostate HDR brachytherapy.
Panettieri V; Smith RL; Mason NJ; Millar JL
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 15(6):5055. PubMed ID: 25493531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Intraoperative and post-implant dosimetry in patients treated with permanent prostate implant brachytherapy].
Herein A; Ágoston P; Szabó Z; Jorgo K; Markgruber B; Pesznyák C; Polgár C; Major T
Magy Onkol; 2015 Jun; 59(2):148-53. PubMed ID: 26035163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dose optimization comparison study of inverse planning simulated annealing [IPSA] and hybrid inverse planning optimization [HIPO] in interstitial brachytherapy of head and neck cancer.
Kumar Barik B; Sarang Dhar S; Singh R; Mandal A; Mohan Aggarwal L; Pratap Shahi U; Choudhary S
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2021 Sep; 52(3):417-421. PubMed ID: 34088645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accelerated partial breast irradiation: a dosimetric comparison of three different techniques.
Weed DW; Edmundson GK; Vicini FA; Chen PY; Martinez AA
Brachytherapy; 2005; 4(2):121-9. PubMed ID: 15893265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dosimetric comparisons between high dose rate interstitial and MammoSite balloon brachytherapy for breast cancer.
Major T; Niehoff P; Kovács G; Fodor J; Polgár C
Radiother Oncol; 2006 Jun; 79(3):321-8. PubMed ID: 16730085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Seroma Visualization and Implant Accuracy in Permanent Breast Seed Implant Brachytherapy.
Morton D; Hilts M; Batchelar D; Tetreault-Laflamme A; Mou B; Crook J
Pract Radiat Oncol; 2019 May; 9(3):e314-e321. PubMed ID: 30641244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Dose Distributions With TG-43 and Collapsed Cone Convolution Algorithms Applied to Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation Patient Plans.
Thrower SL; Shaitelman SF; Bloom E; Salehpour M; Gifford K
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2016 Aug; 95(5):1520-1526. PubMed ID: 27315666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
