168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29396805)
1. Standardized three dimensional computerised tomography scanner reconstructions increase the accuracy of acetabular fracture classification.
Sebaaly A; Riouallon G; Zaraa M; Upex P; Marteau V; Jouffroy P
Int Orthop; 2018 Aug; 42(8):1957-1965. PubMed ID: 29396805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of three-dimensional and two-dimensional computed tomographies in the classification of acetabular fractures.
Kanthawang T; Vaseenon T; Sripan P; Pattamapaspong N
Emerg Radiol; 2020 Apr; 27(2):157-164. PubMed ID: 31792749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Interobserver agreement for Letournel acetabular fracture classification with multidetector CT: are standard Judet radiographs necessary?
Ohashi K; El-Khoury GY; Abu-Zahra KW; Berbaum KS
Radiology; 2006 Nov; 241(2):386-91. PubMed ID: 17005769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of Judet view radiographs accuracy in classification of acetabular fractures compared with three-dimensional computerized tomographic scan: a retrospective study.
Tazeabadi SA; Noroozi SG; Salehzadeh M; Bahardoust M; Farahini H; Hajializade M; Yeganeh A
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2020 Jun; 21(1):405. PubMed ID: 32590966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Acetabular fracture assessment in four different pelvic trauma centers: have the Judet views become superfluous?
Clarke-Jenssen J; Øvre SA; Røise O; Madsen JE
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2015 Jul; 135(7):913-8. PubMed ID: 25931251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Letournel classification for acetabular fractures. Assessment of interobserver and intraobserver reliability.
Beaulé PE; Dorey FJ; Matta JM
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2003 Sep; 85(9):1704-9. PubMed ID: 12954828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A New, Easy, Fast, and Reliable Method to Correctly Classify Acetabular Fractures According to the Letournel System.
Riouallon G; Sebaaly A; Upex P; Zaraa M; Jouffroy P
JB JS Open Access; 2018 Mar; 3(1):e0032. PubMed ID: 30229234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. How to improve the performance of acetabulum fracture diagnoses: investigating the use of three-dimensional CT-scan reconstructions.
Minet C; Reina N; Gracia G; Lapègue F; Sans N; Faruch-Bilfeld M
Emerg Radiol; 2022 Oct; 29(5):863-871. PubMed ID: 35710649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [CT-based classification aid for acetabular fractures: evaluation and clinical testing].
Schäffler A; Fensky F; Knöschke D; Haas NP; Becken AG; Stöckle U; König B
Unfallchirurg; 2013 Nov; 116(11):1006-14. PubMed ID: 23949195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Value of 3D fluoroscopic imaging of acetabular fractures comparison to 2D fluoroscopy and CT imaging.
Kendoff D; Gardner MJ; Citak M; Kfuri M; Thumes B; Krettek C; Hüfner T
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2008 Jun; 128(6):599-605. PubMed ID: 17680254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does semi-automatic bone-fragment segmentation improve the reproducibility of the Letournel acetabular fracture classification?
Boudissa M; Orfeuvre B; Chabanas M; Tonetti J
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2017 Sep; 103(5):633-638. PubMed ID: 28428032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Usefulness and reliability of two- and three-dimensional computed tomography in patients older than 65 years with distal humerus fractures.
Jacquot A; Poussange N; Charrissoux JL; Clavert P; Obert L; Pidhorz L; Sirveaux F; Mansat P; Fabre T
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2014 May; 100(3):275-80. PubMed ID: 24709303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Imaging of the acetabulum in the era of multidetector computed tomography.
Geijer M; El-Khoury GY
Emerg Radiol; 2007 Oct; 14(5):271-87. PubMed ID: 17588182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An accurate method of radiological assessment of acetabular volume and orientation in computed tomography spatial reconstruction.
Jóźwiak M; Rychlik M; Musielak B; Chen BP; Idzior M; Grzegorzewski A
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2015 Feb; 16():42. PubMed ID: 25887277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intraoperative assessment of reduction and implant placement in acetabular fractures-limitations of 3D-imaging compared to computed tomography.
Keil H; Beisemann N; Schnetzke M; Vetter SY; Swartman B; Grützner PA; Franke J
J Orthop Surg Res; 2018 Apr; 13(1):78. PubMed ID: 29636062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of three-dimensional navigation on intraoperative management and early postoperative outcome after open reduction and internal fixation of displaced acetabular fractures.
Oberst M; Hauschild O; Konstantinidis L; Suedkamp NP; Schmal H
J Trauma Acute Care Surg; 2012 Oct; 73(4):950-6. PubMed ID: 22710769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improving reliability in the classification of fractures of the acetabulum.
Petrisor BA; Bhandari M; Orr RD; Mandel S; Kwok DC; Schemitsch EH
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2003 Jun; 123(5):228-33. PubMed ID: 12720013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multiplanar and 3D CT of acetabular fractures.
Haveri M; Junila J; Suramo I; Lähde S
Acta Radiol; 1998 May; 39(3):257-64. PubMed ID: 9571939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. What is the value of 3D virtual reality in understanding acetabular fractures?
Brouwers L; Pull Ter Gunne AF; de Jongh MA; Maal TJJ; Vreeken R; van der Heijden FHWM; Leenen LPH; Spanjersberg WR; van Helden SH; Verbeek DO; Bemelman M; Lansink KWW
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2020 Jan; 30(1):109-116. PubMed ID: 31531739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of computed tomography for determining the diagnosis of acetabular fractures.
O'Toole RV; Cox G; Shanmuganathan K; Castillo RC; Turen CH; Sciadini MF; Nascone JW
J Orthop Trauma; 2010 May; 24(5):284-90. PubMed ID: 20418733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
