BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29397162)

  • 1. Detection of evaluation bias caused by genomic preselection.
    Tyrisevä AM; Mäntysaari EA; Jakobsen J; Aamand GP; Dürr J; Fikse WF; Lidauer MH
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 Apr; 101(4):3155-3163. PubMed ID: 29397162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of a national genomic preselection on the international genetic evaluations.
    Patry C; Jorjani H; Ducrocq V
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 May; 96(5):3272-84. PubMed ID: 23477823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation of consistency of Mendelian sampling variance.
    Tyrisevä AM; Fikse WF; Mäntysaari EA; Jakobsen J; Aamand GP; Dürr J; Lidauer MH
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 Mar; 101(3):2187-2198. PubMed ID: 29290441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evidence of biases in genetic evaluations due to genomic preselection in dairy cattle.
    Patry C; Ducrocq V
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Feb; 94(2):1011-20. PubMed ID: 21257070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Differing genetic trend estimates from traditional and genomic evaluations of genotyped animals as evidence of preselection bias in US Holsteins.
    Masuda Y; VanRaden PM; Misztal I; Lawlor TJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 Jun; 101(6):5194-5206. PubMed ID: 29573806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimal strategies for the use of genomic selection in dairy cattle breeding programs.
    Wensch-Dorendorf M; Yin T; Swalve HH; König S
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Aug; 94(8):4140-51. PubMed ID: 21787949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optimization of a genomic breeding program for a moderately sized dairy cattle population.
    Reiner-Benaim A; Ezra E; Weller JI
    J Dairy Sci; 2017 Apr; 100(4):2892-2904. PubMed ID: 28189326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of using cow genomic information on accuracy and bias of genomic breeding values in a simulated Holstein dairy cattle population.
    Dehnavi E; Mahyari SA; Schenkel FS; Sargolzaei M
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 Jun; 101(6):5166-5176. PubMed ID: 29605309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of preselection of genotyped animals on reliability and bias of genomic prediction in dairy cattle.
    Togashi K; Adachi K; Kurogi K; Yasumori T; Tokunaka K; Ogino A; Miyazaki Y; Watanabe T; Takahashi T; Moribe K
    Asian-Australas J Anim Sci; 2019 Feb; 32(2):159-169. PubMed ID: 30056675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Avoiding preselection bias in subsequent single-step genomic BLUP evaluations of genomically preselected animals.
    Jibrila I; Vandenplas J; Ten Napel J; Veerkamp RF; Calus MPL
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2021 Jul; 138(4):432-441. PubMed ID: 33372707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reducing bias in the dairy cattle single-step genomic evaluation by ignoring bulls without progeny.
    Koivula M; Strandén I; Aamand GP; Mäntysaari EA
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2018 Apr; 135(2):107-115. PubMed ID: 29484731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Invited review: A quarter of a century-International genetic evaluation of dairy sires using MACE methodology.
    Nilforooshan MA; Jorjani H
    J Dairy Sci; 2022 Jan; 105(1):3-21. PubMed ID: 34756440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Technical note: adjustment of all cow evaluations for yield traits to be comparable with bull evaluations.
    Wiggans GR; Vanraden PM; Cooper TA
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Jun; 95(6):3444-7. PubMed ID: 22612979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genomic evaluation of a relatively small dairy cattle population by combination with a larger population.
    Weller JI; Stoop WM; Eding H; Schrooten C; Ezra E
    J Dairy Sci; 2015 Jul; 98(7):4945-55. PubMed ID: 25935250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Investigating the impact of preselection on subsequent single-step genomic BLUP evaluation of preselected animals.
    Jibrila I; Ten Napel J; Vandenplas J; Veerkamp RF; Calus MPL
    Genet Sel Evol; 2020 Jul; 52(1):42. PubMed ID: 32727349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bias in genomic predictions by mating practices for linear type traits in a large-scale genomic evaluation.
    Tsuruta S; Lawlor TJ; Lourenco DAL; Misztal I
    J Dairy Sci; 2021 Jan; 104(1):662-677. PubMed ID: 33162076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of performance records and national breeding values as input into international genetic evaluation.
    Fikse WF
    J Dairy Sci; 2004 Aug; 87(8):2709-19. PubMed ID: 15328297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genomic selection strategies in a small dairy cattle population evaluated for genetic gain and profit.
    Thomasen JR; Egger-Danner C; Willam A; Guldbrandtsen B; Lund MS; Sørensen AC
    J Dairy Sci; 2014; 97(1):458-70. PubMed ID: 24239076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Symposium review: Single-step genomic evaluations in dairy cattle.
    Mäntysaari EA; Koivula M; Strandén I
    J Dairy Sci; 2020 Jun; 103(6):5314-5326. PubMed ID: 32331883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A simple method for genomic selection of moderately sized dairy cattle populations.
    Weller JI; Ron M; Glick G; Shirak A; Zeron Y; Ezra E
    Animal; 2012 Feb; 6(2):193-202. PubMed ID: 22436176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.