These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Social network analysis and the implications for Pontocaspian biodiversity conservation in Romania and Ukraine: A comparative study. Gogaladze A; Raes N; Biesmeijer JC; Ionescu C; Pavel AB; Son MO; Gozak N; Anistratenko VV; Wesselingh FP PLoS One; 2020; 15(10):e0221833. PubMed ID: 33095780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Typologizing Stakeholder Information Use to Better Understand the Impacts of Collaborative Climate Science. VanderMolen K; Meadow AM; Horangic A; Wall TU Environ Manage; 2020 Feb; 65(2):178-189. PubMed ID: 31901957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Understanding the influence of power and empathic perspective-taking on collaborative natural resource management. Wald DM; Segal EA; Johnston EW; Vinze A J Environ Manage; 2017 Sep; 199():201-210. PubMed ID: 28544926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. GIS, modeling, and politics: on the tensions of collaborative decision support. Ramsey K J Environ Manage; 2009 May; 90(6):1972-80. PubMed ID: 18538918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Finally Throwing Those Wellies Away? Collaborating in Search of a Solution for Venice Flooding. Cristofoli D; Trivellato B; Micacchi M; Valotti G Environ Manage; 2023 Mar; 71(3):587-600. PubMed ID: 36208344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A framework for assessing collaborative capacity in community-based public forest management. Cheng AS; Sturtevant VE Environ Manage; 2012 Mar; 49(3):675-89. PubMed ID: 22209779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of USDA Forest Service and Stakeholder Motivations and Experiences in Collaborative Federal Forest Governance in the Western United States. Davis EJ; White EM; Cerveny LK; Seesholtz D; Nuss ML; Ulrich DR Environ Manage; 2017 Nov; 60(5):908-921. PubMed ID: 28815317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The future of Cochrane Neonatal. Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An Assessment of Institutional Capacity for Integrated Landscape Management in Eastern Cameroon. Brown HCP Environ Manage; 2018 Jul; 62(1):118-127. PubMed ID: 29696342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Collaboration in natural resource governance: reconciling stakeholder expectations in deer management in Scotland. Davies AL; White RM J Environ Manage; 2012 Dec; 112():160-9. PubMed ID: 22898708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Retrospective Assessment of a Failed Collaborative Process in Conservation. Kretser HE; Beckmann JP; Berger J Environ Manage; 2018 Sep; 62(3):415-428. PubMed ID: 29680947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Implementing Landscape Scale Conservation across Organizational Boundaries: Lessons from the Central Appalachian Region, United States. Floress K; Connolly S; Halvorsen KE; Egan A; Schuler T; Hill A; DeSenze P; Fenimore S; Karriker K Environ Manage; 2018 Nov; 62(5):845-857. PubMed ID: 30046845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Revenue-sharing clubs provide economic insurance and incentives for sustainability in common-pool resource systems. Tilman AR; Levin S; Watson JR J Theor Biol; 2018 Oct; 454():205-214. PubMed ID: 29883741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Local and regional partnerships in natural resource management: the challenge of bridging institutional levels. Prager K Environ Manage; 2010 Nov; 46(5):711-24. PubMed ID: 20865414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Why won't they come? Stakeholder perspectives on collaborative national forest planning by participation level. Cheng AS; Mattor KM Environ Manage; 2006 Oct; 38(4):545-61. PubMed ID: 16933082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]