These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29398499)
1. Why CAD Failed in Mammography. Kohli A; Jha S J Am Coll Radiol; 2018 Mar; 15(3 Pt B):535-537. PubMed ID: 29398499 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. STORM, a new dimension for mammography screening. Houssami N Med J Aust; 2013 Sep; 199(5):308-9. PubMed ID: 23992172 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Legal Ramifications of Computer-Aided Detection in Mammography. Mezrich JL; Siegel EL J Am Coll Radiol; 2015 Jun; 12(6):572-4. PubMed ID: 25547380 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Utilization of Computer-Aided Detection for Digital Screening Mammography in the United States, 2008 to 2016. Keen JD; Keen JM; Keen JE J Am Coll Radiol; 2018 Jan; 15(1 Pt A):44-48. PubMed ID: 28993109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Computer-aided detection mammography for breast cancer screening: systematic review and meta-analysis. Noble M; Bruening W; Uhl S; Schoelles K Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jun; 279(6):881-90. PubMed ID: 19023581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Computer-aided detection output on 172 subtle findings on normal mammograms previously obtained in women with breast cancer detected at follow-up screening mammography. Ikeda DM; Birdwell RL; O'Shaughnessy KF; Sickles EA; Brenner RJ Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):811-9. PubMed ID: 14764891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. CAD systems for mammography: a real opportunity? A review of the literature. Bazzocchi M; Mazzarella F; Del Frate C; Girometti R; Zuiani C Radiol Med; 2007 Apr; 112(3):329-53. PubMed ID: 17440698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Computer-aided detection for screening mammography. Astley SM Acad Radiol; 2004 Oct; 11(10):1139-43. PubMed ID: 15530806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Strategies for digital mammography interpretation in a clinical patient population. van den Biggelaar FJ; Kessels AG; van Engelshoven JM; Flobbe K Int J Cancer; 2009 Dec; 125(12):2923-9. PubMed ID: 19672861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Importance of Better Human-Computer Interaction in the Era of Deep Learning: Mammography Computer-Aided Diagnosis as a Use Case. Nishikawa RM; Bae KT J Am Coll Radiol; 2018 Jan; 15(1 Pt A):49-52. PubMed ID: 29097047 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Invasive breast cancers detected by screening mammography: a detailed comparison of computer-aided detection-assisted single reading and double reading. Cawson JN; Nickson C; Amos A; Hill G; Whan AB; Kavanagh AM J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2009 Oct; 53(5):442-9. PubMed ID: 19788479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Computer-aided detection, in its present form, is not an effective aid for screening mammography. For the proposition. Nishikawa RM Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):811-2. PubMed ID: 16696454 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Computer-aided detection with full-field digital mammography. Technol Eval Cent Assess Program Exec Summ; 2006 May; 21(3):1-3. PubMed ID: 16718969 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of computer-aided detection on independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammograms. Skaane P; Kshirsagar A; Stapleton S; Young K; Castellino RA AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Feb; 188(2):377-84. PubMed ID: 17242245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of computer-aided detection in a regional screening mammography program. Cupples TE; Cunningham JE; Reynolds JC AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Oct; 185(4):944-50. PubMed ID: 16177413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Computer-aided detection, in its present form, is not an effective aid for screening mammography. Against the proposition. Kallergi M Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):812-4. PubMed ID: 16696455 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]