These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29398499)

  • 21. The preponderance of evidence supports computer-aided detection for screening mammography.
    Birdwell RL
    Radiology; 2009 Oct; 253(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 19789250
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Ductal carcinoma in situ: computer-aided detection in screening mammography.
    Pai VR; Gregory NE; Swinford AE; Rebner M
    Radiology; 2006 Dec; 241(3):689-94. PubMed ID: 17053200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Incorporating new technologies into clinical practice without evidence of effectiveness in prospective studies: computer-aided detection (CAD) in breast screening reinforces the need for better initial evaluation.
    Houssami N; Given-Wilson R
    Breast; 2007 Jun; 16(3):219-21. PubMed ID: 17512732
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Estimating the effect of computer-aided detection on the sensitivity of screening mammography.
    Sacks WM
    Radiology; 2003 Feb; 226(2):597-8; author reply 598-9. PubMed ID: 12563163
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Computer-assisted diagnosis in mammography: the R2 ImageChecker System in detection of spiculated lesions].
    Funovics M; Schamp S; Lackner B; Wunderbaldinger P; Lechner G; Wolf G
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 1998; 148(14):321-4. PubMed ID: 9816642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Screening mammography-detected cancers: sensitivity of a computer-aided detection system applied to full-field digital mammograms.
    Yang SK; Moon WK; Cho N; Park JS; Cha JH; Kim SM; Kim SJ; Im JG
    Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):104-11. PubMed ID: 17507722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Digital mammography.
    Feig SA; Yaffe MJ
    Radiographics; 1998; 18(4):893-901. PubMed ID: 9672974
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Early detection of breast cancer: overview of the evidence on computer-aided detection in mammography screening.
    Houssami N; Given-Wilson R; Ciatto S
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2009 Apr; 53(2):171-6. PubMed ID: 19527363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Current status and issues of digital mammography and CAD (computer aided detection)].
    Uchiyama N
    Nihon Rinsho; 2007 Jun; 65 Suppl 6():329-32. PubMed ID: 17682174
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Prospective assessment of computer-aided detection in interpretation of screening mammography.
    Ko JM; Nicholas MJ; Mendel JB; Slanetz PJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Dec; 187(6):1483-91. PubMed ID: 17114541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital Screening Mammography With and Without Computer-Aided Detection.
    Lehman CD; Wellman RD; Buist DS; Kerlikowske K; Tosteson AN; Miglioretti DL;
    JAMA Intern Med; 2015 Nov; 175(11):1828-37. PubMed ID: 26414882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Impact on breast cancer diagnosis in a multidisciplinary unit after the incorporation of mammography digitalization and computer-aided detection systems.
    Romero C; Varela C; Muñoz E; Almenar A; Pinto JM; Botella M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Dec; 197(6):1492-7. PubMed ID: 22109307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Can computer-aided detection be detrimental to mammographic interpretation?
    Philpotts LE
    Radiology; 2009 Oct; 253(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 19789251
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Consistency of lesion size in digital mammography.
    Clunie DA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Sep; 195(3):W257; author reply W258. PubMed ID: 20729426
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Blinded comparison of computer-aided detection with human second reading in screening mammography: the importance of the question and the critical numbers game.
    Brem RF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Nov; 189(5):1142-4. PubMed ID: 17954652
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Use of computer-assisted diagnosis (CAD) and tele-mammography in preventive breast cancer screening].
    Schneider W; Heinlein P; Drexl J; Gössler A
    Rontgenpraxis; 2002; 54(5):192-8. PubMed ID: 12051081
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Computer-aided methods help cancer diagnoses.
    Giger ML; Wolverton DE
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1996 Nov; Suppl Digital X():D17-20. PubMed ID: 10181866
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Computer-aided screening mammography.
    Feig SA; Birdwell RL; Linver MN
    N Engl J Med; 2007 Jul; 357(1):84; author reply 85. PubMed ID: 17615628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Computer-aided screening mammography.
    Gur D
    N Engl J Med; 2007 Jul; 357(1):83-4; author reply 85. PubMed ID: 17615631
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Nonspecific findings confound screening for breast cancer.
    Wagner SK
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 2000 Mar; 22(3):41-2, 45-6. PubMed ID: 10947282
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.