These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29398726)

  • 1. Probabilistic methods surpass parsimony when assessing clade support in phylogenetic analyses of discrete morphological data.
    O'Reilly JE; Puttick MN; Pisani D; Donoghue PCJ
    Palaeontology; 2018 Jan; 61(1):105-118. PubMed ID: 29398726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Uncertain-tree: discriminating among competing approaches to the phylogenetic analysis of phenotype data.
    Puttick MN; O'Reilly JE; Tanner AR; Fleming JF; Clark J; Holloway L; Lozano-Fernandez J; Parry LA; Tarver JE; Pisani D; Donoghue PC
    Proc Biol Sci; 2017 Jan; 284(1846):. PubMed ID: 28077778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bayesian methods outperform parsimony but at the expense of precision in the estimation of phylogeny from discrete morphological data.
    O'Reilly JE; Puttick MN; Parry L; Tanner AR; Tarver JE; Fleming J; Pisani D; Donoghue PC
    Biol Lett; 2016 Apr; 12(4):. PubMed ID: 27095266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Parsimony, not Bayesian analysis, recovers more stratigraphically congruent phylogenetic trees.
    Sansom RS; Choate PG; Keating JN; Randle E
    Biol Lett; 2018 Jun; 14(6):. PubMed ID: 29925561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating the Performance of Probabilistic Algorithms for Phylogenetic Analysis of Big Morphological Datasets: A Simulation Study.
    Vernygora OV; Simões TR; Campbell EO
    Syst Biol; 2020 Nov; 69(6):1088-1105. PubMed ID: 32191335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Failed refutations: further comments on parsimony and likelihood methods and their relationship to Popper's degree of corroboration.
    de Queiroz K; Poe S
    Syst Biol; 2003 Jun; 52(3):352-67. PubMed ID: 12775524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative evaluation of maximum parsimony and Bayesian phylogenetic reconstruction using empirical morphological data.
    Schrago CG; Aguiar BO; Mello B
    J Evol Biol; 2018 Oct; 31(10):1477-1484. PubMed ID: 29957887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bayesian and parsimony approaches reconstruct informative trees from simulated morphological datasets.
    Smith MR
    Biol Lett; 2019 Feb; 15(2):20180632. PubMed ID: 30958126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Molecular phylogeny of the carnivora (mammalia): assessing the impact of increased sampling on resolving enigmatic relationships.
    Flynn JJ; Finarelli JA; Zehr S; Hsu J; Nedbal MA
    Syst Biol; 2005 Apr; 54(2):317-37. PubMed ID: 16012099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bayesian and maximum likelihood phylogenetic analyses of protein sequence data under relative branch-length differences and model violation.
    Mar JC; Harlow TJ; Ragan MA
    BMC Evol Biol; 2005 Jan; 5():8. PubMed ID: 15676079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Phylogeny of the cycads based on multiple single-copy nuclear genes: congruence of concatenated parsimony, likelihood and species tree inference methods.
    Salas-Leiva DE; Meerow AW; Calonje M; Griffith MP; Francisco-Ortega J; Nakamura K; Stevenson DW; Lewis CE; Namoff S
    Ann Bot; 2013 Nov; 112(7):1263-78. PubMed ID: 23997230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Homoplasy and clade support.
    Brandley MC; Warren DL; Leaché AD; McGuire JA
    Syst Biol; 2009 Apr; 58(2):184-98. PubMed ID: 20525577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Handling Logical Character Dependency in Phylogenetic Inference: Extensive Performance Testing of Assumptions and Solutions Using Simulated and Empirical Data.
    Simões TR; Vernygora OV; de Medeiros BAS; Wright AM
    Syst Biol; 2023 Jun; 72(3):662-680. PubMed ID: 36773019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bayesian analysis using a simple likelihood model outperforms parsimony for estimation of phylogeny from discrete morphological data.
    Wright AM; Hillis DM
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(10):e109210. PubMed ID: 25279853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficacy or convenience? Model-based approaches to phylogeny estimation using morphological data.
    Spencer MR; Wilberg EW
    Cladistics; 2013 Dec; 29(6):663-671. PubMed ID: 34809403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Molecular systematics of the Eastern Fence Lizard (Sceloporus undulatus): a comparison of Parsimony, Likelihood, and Bayesian approaches.
    Leaché AD; Reeder TW
    Syst Biol; 2002 Feb; 51(1):44-68. PubMed ID: 11943092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Early cephalopod evolution clarified through Bayesian phylogenetic inference.
    Pohle A; Kröger B; Warnock RCM; King AH; Evans DH; Aubrechtová M; Cichowolski M; Fang X; Klug C
    BMC Biol; 2022 Apr; 20(1):88. PubMed ID: 35421982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Weighted parsimony outperforms other methods of phylogenetic inference under models appropriate for morphology.
    Goloboff PA; Torres A; Arias JS
    Cladistics; 2018 Aug; 34(4):407-437. PubMed ID: 34649370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stasis and convergence characterize morphological evolution in eupolypod II ferns.
    Sundue MA; Rothfels CJ
    Ann Bot; 2014 Jan; 113(1):35-54. PubMed ID: 24197753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Performance of tree-building methods using a morphological dataset and a well-supported Hexapoda phylogeny.
    Francisco Barbosa F; Mermudes JRM; Russo CAM
    PeerJ; 2024; 12():e16706. PubMed ID: 38213769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.