129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29399011)
1. Mutual Information Correlation with Human Vision in Medical Image Compression.
Lin LH; Chen TJ
Curr Med Imaging Rev; 2018 Feb; 14(1):64-70. PubMed ID: 29399011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Objective index of image fidelity for JPEG2000 compressed body CT images.
Kim KJ; Lee KH; Kang HS; Kim SY; Kim YH; Kim B; Seo J; Mantiuk R
Med Phys; 2009 Jul; 36(7):3218-26. PubMed ID: 19673221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Evaluation of irreversible compressed images in computed radiography using physical image quality measures].
Watanabe H; Tsai DY; Lee Y; Nakamura T; Miyazaki M; Kuramochi Y; Kojima K
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2009 Dec; 65(12):1618-27. PubMed ID: 20124739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of three image fidelity metrics of different computational principles for JPEG2000 compressed abdomen CT images.
Kim KJ; Kim B; Mantiuk R; Richter T; Lee H; Kang HS; Seo J; Lee KH
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2010 Aug; 29(8):1496-503. PubMed ID: 20529734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A statistical method for evaluation quality of medical images: a case study in bit discarding and image compression.
Chen TJ; Chuang KS; Chiang YC; Chang JH; Liu RS
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2004 Jun; 28(4):167-75. PubMed ID: 15121206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of High-Efficiency Image Coding algorithm for dermatology images in teledermatology.
Bakhshali MA; Gholizadeh M; Layegh P; Nahidi Y; Memarzadeh Z; Meybodi NT; Eslami S
Skin Res Technol; 2021 Nov; 27(6):1162-1168. PubMed ID: 34251058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Advantage in image fidelity and additional computing time of JPEG2000 3D in comparison to JPEG2000 in compressing abdomen CT image datasets of different section thicknesses.
Lee H; Lee KH; Kim KJ; Park S; Seo J; Shin YG; Kim B
Med Phys; 2010 Aug; 37(8):4238-48. PubMed ID: 20879584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Novel Image Processing Approach to Enhancement and Compression of X-ray Images.
Pourasad Y; Cavallaro F
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Jun; 18(13):. PubMed ID: 34206486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. JPEG2000 compression of thin-section CT images of the lung: effect of compression ratio on image quality.
Ringl H; Schernthaner RE; Bankier AA; Weber M; Prokop M; Herold CJ; Schaefer-Prokop C
Radiology; 2006 Sep; 240(3):869-77. PubMed ID: 16868278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. JPEG2000 3D compression vs. 2D compression: an assessment of artifact amount and computing time in compressing thin-section abdomen CT images.
Kim B; Lee KH; Kim KJ; Richter T; Kang HS; Kim SY; Kim YH; Seo J
Med Phys; 2009 Mar; 36(3):835-44. PubMed ID: 19378744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Correlation between subjective and objective assessment of magnetic resonance (MR) images.
Chow LS; Rajagopal H; Paramesran R;
Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jul; 34(6):820-831. PubMed ID: 26969762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Lossy three-dimensional JPEG2000 compression of abdominal CT images: assessment of the visually lossless threshold and effect of compression ratio on image quality.
Ringl H; Schernthaner RE; Kulinna-Cosentini C; Weber M; Schaefer-Prokop C; Herold CJ; Schima W
Radiology; 2007 Nov; 245(2):467-74. PubMed ID: 17890355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Near Lossless Compression for 3D Radiological Images Using Optimal Multilinear Singular Value Decomposition (3D-VOI-OMLSVD).
Boopathiraja S; Kalavathi P; Deoghare S; Prasath VBS
J Digit Imaging; 2023 Feb; 36(1):259-275. PubMed ID: 36038701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. IntOPMICM: Intelligent Medical Image Size Reduction Model.
Pareek PK; Sridhar C; Kalidoss R; Aslam M; Maheshwari M; Shukla PK; Nuagah SJ
J Healthc Eng; 2022; 2022():5171016. PubMed ID: 35251570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of wavelet and Joint Photographic Experts Group lossy compression methods applied to medical images.
Iyriboz TA; Zukoski MJ; Hopper KD; Stagg PL
J Digit Imaging; 1999 May; 12(2 Suppl 1):14-7. PubMed ID: 10342156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fractal analysis of periapical bone from lossy compressed radiographs: a comparison of two lossy compression methods.
Baksi BG; Fidler A
J Digit Imaging; 2011 Dec; 24(6):993-8. PubMed ID: 21465294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A novel weighted compressive sensing using L1-magic recovery technique in medical image compression.
Alaa EE; Ashour AS; Guo Y; Kasem HM
Health Inf Sci Syst; 2020 Dec; 8(1):2. PubMed ID: 31915521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. HVS-based medical image compression.
Kai X; Jie Y; Min ZY; Liang LX
Eur J Radiol; 2005 Jul; 55(1):139-45. PubMed ID: 15950111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A new image steganography method with optimum pixel similarity for data hiding in medical images.
Karakus S; Avci E
Med Hypotheses; 2020 Jun; 139():109691. PubMed ID: 32240879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Compression quality prediction model for JPEG2000.
Li L; Wang ZS
IEEE Trans Image Process; 2010 Feb; 19(2):384-98. PubMed ID: 19840909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
