These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29399704)

  • 41. Haptic feedback attenuates illusory bias in pantomime-grasping: evidence for a visuo-haptic calibration.
    Chan J; Heath M
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Apr; 235(4):1041-1051. PubMed ID: 28070622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The Interaction Between Feedback Type and Learning in Routine Grasping With Myoelectric Prostheses.
    Wilke MA; Hartmann C; Schimpf F; Farina D; Dosen S
    IEEE Trans Haptics; 2020; 13(3):645-654. PubMed ID: 31870991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Why do the eyes prefer the index finger? Simultaneous recording of eye and hand movements during precision grasping.
    Cavina-Pratesi C; Hesse C
    J Vis; 2013 Apr; 13(5):. PubMed ID: 23599419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Visual Feedback of Target Position Affects Accuracy of Sequential Movements at Even Spaces.
    Matsui H; Ryu M; Kawabata H
    J Mot Behav; 2018; 50(6):689-696. PubMed ID: 29236615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Rhythmic movements are larger and faster but with the same frequency on removal of visual feedback.
    Levy-Tzedek S; Ben Tov M; Karniel A
    J Neurophysiol; 2011 Nov; 106(5):2120-6. PubMed ID: 21813746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Effect of visuomotor-map uncertainty on visuomotor adaptation.
    Saijo N; Gomi H
    J Neurophysiol; 2012 Mar; 107(6):1576-85. PubMed ID: 22190631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Saccadic updating of object orientation for grasping movements.
    Selen LP; Medendorp WP
    Vision Res; 2011 Apr; 51(8):898-907. PubMed ID: 21232550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Do humans prefer to see their grasping points?
    Voudouris D; Smeets JB; Brenner E
    J Mot Behav; 2012; 44(4):295-304. PubMed ID: 22857715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Visual feedback of hand and target location does not explain the tendency for straight adapted reaches.
    Zahed F; Berniker M
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0206116. PubMed ID: 30356285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Perceiving your hand moving: BOLD suppression in sensory cortices and the role of the cerebellum in the detection of feedback delays.
    Arikan BE; van Kemenade BM; Podranski K; Steinsträter O; Straube B; Kircher T
    J Vis; 2019 Dec; 19(14):4. PubMed ID: 31826249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Visual information from observing grasping movement in allocentric and egocentric perspectives: development in typical children.
    Tinelli F; Cioni G; Sandini G; Turi M; Morrone MC
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Jul; 235(7):2039-2047. PubMed ID: 28352948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Anticipatory coarticulation in non-speeded arm movements can be motor-equivalent, carry-over coarticulation always is.
    Hansen E; Grimme B; Reimann H; Schöner G
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 May; 236(5):1293-1307. PubMed ID: 29492588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The use of visual feedback and on-line target information in catching and grasping.
    Schenk T; Mair B; Zihl J
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Jan; 154(1):85-96. PubMed ID: 14661068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Visual monitoring of goal-directed aiming movements.
    Brière J; Proteau L
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Apr; 70(4):736-749. PubMed ID: 26902290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Biomechanical factors may explain why grasping violates Weber's law.
    Utz KS; Hesse C; Aschenneller N; Schenk T
    Vision Res; 2015 Jun; 111(Pt A):22-30. PubMed ID: 25872174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Non-obstructing 3D depth cues influence reach-to-grasp kinematics.
    Worssam CJ; Meade LC; Connolly JD
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Feb; 233(2):385-96. PubMed ID: 25311388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Use of early phase online vision for grip configuration is modulated according to movement duration in prehension.
    Fukui T; Inui T
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Aug; 233(8):2257-68. PubMed ID: 25929554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The influence of visual target information on the online control of movements.
    Sarlegna FR; Mutha PK
    Vision Res; 2015 May; 110(Pt B):144-54. PubMed ID: 25038472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Reaching and grasping with restricted peripheral vision.
    González-Alvarez C; Subramanian A; Pardhan S
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 May; 27(3):265-74. PubMed ID: 17470239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Bimanual coordination and the intermittency of visual information in isometric force tracking.
    Lafe CW; Pacheco MM; Newell KM
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Jul; 234(7):2025-2034. PubMed ID: 26960740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.