These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 293999)

  • 21. Detection of bone loss with different X-ray techniques in periodontal patients.
    Kim TS; Obst C; Zehaczek S; Geenen C
    J Periodontol; 2008 Jul; 79(7):1141-9. PubMed ID: 18597595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [ON EVALUATION OF THE DENTAL-MAXILLARY AREA WITH THE PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHIC TECHNIC].
    HAUSER P
    Radiologe; 1964 Sep; 4():319-24. PubMed ID: 14320083
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The radiographic assessment of implant patients: decision-making criteria.
    Dula K; Mini R; van der Stelt PF; Buser D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(1):80-9. PubMed ID: 11280366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Radiographic technic on dental radiography. Panoramic radiographs with the orthopantomograph. II].
    Taugerbeck R
    Quintessenz J; 1974 Mar; 4(3):57-60. PubMed ID: 4525919
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Ear ring cysts of the jaws. An artefact of the orthopantomogram.
    Mars M
    Br Dent J; 1974 Aug; 137(4):135-6. PubMed ID: 4531987
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A comparative study of radiation doses received during examinations with the pantomograph, orthopantomograph, Panorex, Status-X and conventional roentgen apparatus.
    Altonen M; Heikkilä M; Mattila K
    Proc Finn Dent Soc; 1974 Apr; 70(2):67-74. PubMed ID: 4831509
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The evaluation of vertical heights of maxillary and mandibular bones and the location of anatomic landmarks in panoramic radiographs of edentulous patients for implant dentistry.
    Güler AU; Sumer M; Sumer P; Biçer I
    J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Oct; 32(10):741-6. PubMed ID: 16159352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [The evaluation of the marginal bone height on traditional and digitized panoramic radiographs].
    Larsen TS; Regli PE
    Tandlaegebladet; 1989 Jan; 93(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 2623591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Panoramic radiography in the assessment of the marginal bone level.
    Akesson L
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1991; 78():1-129. PubMed ID: 1896925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. An evaluation of image quality for the assessment of the marginal bone level in panoramic radiography. A comparison of radiographs from different dental clinics.
    Akesson L; Håkansson J; Rohlin M; Zöger B
    Swed Dent J; 1993; 17(1-2):9-21. PubMed ID: 8362363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The quality of the X-ray image: fault analysis.
    Brocklebank LM
    Dent Update; 1998 Jun; 25(5):188-90, 192-4. PubMed ID: 18170953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A comparative diagnostic assessment of anterior tooth and bone status using panoramic and periapical radiography.
    Le T; Nassery K; Kahlert B; Heithersay G
    Aust Orthod J; 2011 Nov; 27(2):162-8. PubMed ID: 22372273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Alveolar recess in panoramic radiography].
    Rottke B; Bargatzki A
    Quintessenz; 1988 Feb; 39(2):277-83. PubMed ID: 3166154
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The formation and the alveolar and clinical eruption of the permanent teeth. An orthopantomographic study.
    Haavikko K
    Suom Hammaslaak Toim; 1970; 66(3):103-70. PubMed ID: 4917152
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Image quality in panoramic radiography.
    Molander B; Ahlqwist M; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Feb; 24(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 8593902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A comparative evaluation of film and digital panoramic radiographs in the assessment of position and morphology of impacted mandibular third molars.
    Mahesh MS; Mahima VG; Patil K
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):219-24. PubMed ID: 21891889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Medical devices; performance standard for diagnostic x-ray systems; amendment. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Public Health Service (PHS), Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Final rule.
    Fed Regist; 1999 Jul; 64(127):35924-8. PubMed ID: 10558580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Rotational panoramic versus intraoral rectangular radiographs for evaluation of peri-implant bone loss in the anterior atrophic mandible.
    Zechner W; Watzak G; Gahleitner A; Busenlechner D; Tepper G; Watzek G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(6):873-8. PubMed ID: 14696663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Conventional dental radiology: what the general radiologist needs to know.
    Bernaerts A; Vanhoenacker FM; Geenen L; Quisquater G; Parizel PM
    JBR-BTR; 2006; 89(1):23-32. PubMed ID: 16607874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A comparison of panoramic radiography with computed tomography in the planning of implant surgery.
    Tal H; Moses O
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1991 Feb; 20(1):40-2. PubMed ID: 1884852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.