These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

579 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29399999)

  • 1. Effect of length and location of edentulous area on the accuracy of prosthetic treatment plan incorporation into cone-beam computed tomography scans.
    Jamjoom FZ; Kim DG; Lee DJ; McGlumphy EA; Yilmaz B
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2018 Jun; 20(3):300-307. PubMed ID: 29399999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Positional accuracy of a prosthetic treatment plan incorporated into a cone beam computed tomography scan using surface scan registration.
    Jamjoom FZ; Kim DG; McGlumphy EA; Lee DJ; Yilmaz B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):367-374. PubMed ID: 29703673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of number of registration points on the positional accuracy of a prosthetic treatment plan incorporated into a cone beam computed tomography scan by surface scan registration: An in vitro study.
    Jamjoom FZ; Yilmaz B; Johnston WM
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2019 Aug; 30(8):826-832. PubMed ID: 31161678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Monitoring of typodont root movement via crown superimposition of single cone-beam computed tomography and consecutive intraoral scans.
    Lee RJ; Pham J; Choy M; Weissheimer A; Dougherty HL; Sameshima GT; Tong H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Mar; 145(3):399-409. PubMed ID: 24582031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect on the performance of a dynamic navigation system of superimposing a standard tessellation language (STL) file obtained with an intraoral scan on a cone beam computer tomograph (CBCT). An experimental in vitro study.
    Jorba-García A; Ruiz-Romero V; Bara-Casaus JJ; Camps-Font O; Sánchez-Garcés MÁ; Figueiredo R; Valmaseda-Castellón E
    J Dent; 2024 Sep; 148():105150. PubMed ID: 38909646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. New protocol for three-dimensional surgical planning and CAD/CAM splint generation in orthognathic surgery: an in vitro and in vivo study.
    Hernández-Alfaro F; Guijarro-Martínez R
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Dec; 42(12):1547-56. PubMed ID: 23768749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Group 5 ITI Consensus Report: Digital technologies.
    Wismeijer D; Joda T; Flügge T; Fokas G; Tahmaseb A; Bechelli D; Bohner L; Bornstein M; Burgoyne A; Caram S; Carmichael R; Chen CY; Coucke W; Derksen W; Donos N; El Kholy K; Evans C; Fehmer V; Fickl S; Fragola G; Gimenez Gonzales B; Gholami H; Hashim D; Hui Y; Kökat A; Vazouras K; Kühl S; Lanis A; Leesungbok R; van der Meer J; Liu Z; Sato T; De Souza A; Scarfe WC; Tosta M; van Zyl P; Vach K; Vaughn V; Vucetic M; Wang P; Wen B; Wu V
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Oct; 29 Suppl 16():436-442. PubMed ID: 30328201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of the match between cone beam computed tomography and model scan data in template-guided implant planning: A prospective controlled clinical study.
    Schnutenhaus S; Gröller S; Luthardt RG; Rudolph H
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2018 Aug; 20(4):541-549. PubMed ID: 29691987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy and reproducibility of virtual edentulous casts created by laboratory impression scan protocols.
    Peng L; Chen L; Harris BT; Bhandari B; Morton D; Lin WS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):389-395. PubMed ID: 29703675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Use of cone beam computed tomography and a laser intraoral scanner in virtual dental implant surgery: part 1.
    Lee CY; Ganz SD; Wong N; Suzuki JB
    Implant Dent; 2012 Aug; 21(4):265-71. PubMed ID: 22814549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cone Beam Computed Tomography vs Multislice Computed Tomography in Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Assisted Manufacture Guided Implant Surgery Based on Three-Dimensional Optical Scanning and Stereolithographic Guides: Does Image Modality Matter?
    Widmann G; Fischer B; Berggren JP; Dennhardt A; Schullian P; Reto B; Puelacher W
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(3):527-33. PubMed ID: 27183061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modular preoperative planning software for computer-aided oral implantology and the application of a novel stereolithographic template: a pilot study.
    Chen X; Yuan J; Wang C; Huang Y; Kang L
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 Sep; 12(3):181-93. PubMed ID: 19438944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of Dynamic Navigation System Workflow for Implant Supported Full Arch Prosthesis: A Case Series.
    Stefanelli LV; Mandelaris GA; Franchina A; Pranno N; Pagliarulo M; Cera F; Maltese F; Angelis F; Carlo SD
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Jul; 17(14):. PubMed ID: 32668790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy and efficiency of full-arch digitalization and 3D printing: A comparison between desktop model scanners, an intraoral scanner, a CBCT model scan, and stereolithographic 3D printing.
    Wesemann C; Muallah J; Mah J; Bumann A
    Quintessence Int; 2017; 48(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 27834416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Replacement of the Distorted Dentition of the Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Scans for Orthognathic Surgery Planning.
    Almutairi T; Naudi K; Nairn N; Ju X; Whitters J; Ayoub A
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Jul; 76(7):1561.e1-1561.e8. PubMed ID: 29572134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impacts of Thresholds of Gray Value for Cone-Beam Computed Tomography 3D Reconstruction on the Accuracy of Image Matching with Optical Scan.
    Park SW; Yoon RG; Lee H; Lee HJ; Choi YD; Lee DH
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Sep; 17(17):. PubMed ID: 32882986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In Vivo Accuracy of Implant Placement Using a Full Digital Planning Modality and Stereolithographic Guides.
    Skjerven H; Riis UH; Herlofsson BB; Ellingsen JE
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(1):124-132. PubMed ID: 30695088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Registration accuracy in the integration of laser-scanned dental images into maxillofacial cone-beam computed tomography images.
    Noh H; Nabha W; Cho JH; Hwang HS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Oct; 140(4):585-91. PubMed ID: 21967948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of implant surgical guides fabricated using computer numerical control milling for edentulous jaws: a pilot clinical trial.
    Chai J; Liu X; Schweyen R; Setz J; Pan S; Liu J; Zhou Y
    BMC Oral Health; 2020 Oct; 20(1):288. PubMed ID: 33087073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of Three-Dimensional Printed Templates for Guided Implant Placement Based on Matching a Surface Scan with CBCT.
    Kernen F; Benic GI; Payer M; Schär A; Müller-Gerbl M; Filippi A; Kühl S
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2016 Aug; 18(4):762-8. PubMed ID: 25923363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 29.