These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29400611)

  • 21. Generalization of evaluative conditioning toward foods: Increasing sensitivity to health in eating intentions.
    Bui ET; Fazio RH
    Health Psychol; 2016 Aug; 35(8):852-855. PubMed ID: 27505206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Learning to dislike alcohol: conditioning negative implicit attitudes toward alcohol and its effect on drinking behavior.
    Houben K; Havermans RC; Wiers RW
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2010 Jul; 211(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 20431994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The influence of instructions on generalised valence - conditional stimulus instructions after evaluative conditioning update the explicit and implicit evaluations of generalisation stimuli.
    Patterson RR; Lipp OV; Luck CC
    Cogn Emot; 2023; 37(4):666-682. PubMed ID: 36967641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Implicit attitude formation through classical conditioning.
    Olson MA; Fazio RH
    Psychol Sci; 2001 Sep; 12(5):413-7. PubMed ID: 11554676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Examining the impact of distance as a contextual cue in evaluative conditioning.
    Hughes S; Mattavelli S; De Houwer J
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0204855. PubMed ID: 30286125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Implicit misattribution of evaluative responses: contingency-unaware evaluative conditioning requires simultaneous stimulus presentations.
    Hütter M; Sweldens S
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2013 Aug; 142(3):638-43. PubMed ID: 22946896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Is the devil in the detail? Evidence for S-S learning after unconditional stimulus revaluation in human evaluative conditioning under a broader set of experimental conditions.
    Jensen-Fielding H; Luck CC; Lipp OV
    Cogn Emot; 2018 Sep; 32(6):1275-1290. PubMed ID: 29183247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Shaking that icky feeling: effects of extinction and counterconditioning on disgust-related evaluative learning.
    Engelhard IM; Leer A; Lange E; Olatunji BO
    Behav Ther; 2014 Sep; 45(5):708-19. PubMed ID: 25022781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluative conditioning may incur attentional costs.
    Pleyers G; Corneille O; Yzerbyt V; Luminet O
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2009 Apr; 35(2):279-85. PubMed ID: 19364237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Of two minds or one? A registered replication of Rydell et al. (2006).
    Heycke T; Gehrmann S; Haaf JM; Stahl C
    Cogn Emot; 2018 Dec; 32(8):1708-1727. PubMed ID: 29383978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Examining conceptual generalisation after acquisition, extinction, and reinstatement in evaluative conditioning.
    Patterson RR; Lipp OV; Luck CC
    Cogn Emot; 2024 Oct; ():1-23. PubMed ID: 39370675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Indirect measures as a signal for evaluative change.
    Perugini M; Richetin J; Zogmaister C
    Cogn Emot; 2014; 28(2):208-29. PubMed ID: 23815614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Is evaluative conditioning really uncontrollable? A comparative test of three emotion-focused strategies to prevent the acquisition of conditioned preferences.
    Gawronski B; Mitchell DG; Balas R
    Emotion; 2015 Oct; 15(5):556-68. PubMed ID: 25915000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. I like it because I said that I like it: evaluative conditioning effects can be based on stimulus-response learning.
    Gast A; Rothermund K
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2011 Oct; 37(4):466-76. PubMed ID: 21500929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Single-trial evaluative conditioning can be moderated by instructed forgetting.
    Gast A; Kattner F
    Learn Behav; 2016 Sep; 44(3):260-9. PubMed ID: 26895978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Aware and (dis)liking: item-based analyses reveal that valence acquisition via evaluative conditioning emerges only when there is contingency awareness.
    Pleyers G; Corneille O; Luminet O; Yzerbyt V
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Jan; 33(1):130-44. PubMed ID: 17201557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. When congruence breeds preference: the influence of selective attention processes on evaluative conditioning.
    Blask K; Walther E; Frings C
    Cogn Emot; 2017 Sep; 31(6):1127-1139. PubMed ID: 27338588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The influence of pre-training evaluative responses on approach-avoidance training outcomes.
    Krishna A; Eder AB
    Cogn Emot; 2019 Nov; 33(7):1410-1423. PubMed ID: 30663944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. What is learned from repeated pairings? On the scope and generalizability of evaluative conditioning.
    Hütter M; Kutzner F; Fiedler K
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Apr; 143(2):631-43. PubMed ID: 23796043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Cue competition in evaluative conditioning as a function of the learning process.
    Kattner F; Green CS
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Nov; 162():40-50. PubMed ID: 26458253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.